There are about 173942 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United States. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
In this study, the investigators seek to evaluate a novel tissue-cooling device for pain management during needle sticks and /or blood draw on the fingertips.
To understand the long-term epidemiology, develop effective risk-prediction and stratification tools, and understand the pathobiology of kidney disease in COVID-19 survivors.
A study to obtain normative values and repeatability measures during functional reaching tasks in able-bodied individuals with no functional limitations.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate relatlimab in combination with nivolumab, administered as a fixed-dose combination (nivolumab-relatlimab FDC, also referred to as BMS-986213) for the treatment of non-microsatellite instability high (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) participants who failed at least 1 but no more than 4 prior lines of therapy for metastatic disease.
The intent of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of single escalating subcutaneous doses of CUG252 in healthy adult subjects.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of JNJ-55308942 compared to placebo on symptoms of depression in participants with bipolar disorder (BD) in a major depressive episode (MDE) at Week 6.
This is a pivotal Phase 2/3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of epetraborole + OBR (Optimized Background Regimen) versus placebo + OBR in patients with treatment-refractory MAC lung disease. This study will enroll adult patients with treatment-refractory MAC lung disease who meet all eligibility criteria (including clinical, radiographic, and microbiological criteria).
This study investigates whether providing 8 weeks of complimentary electronic cigarettes (EC) or nicotine pouches (NP) to low socioeconomic status (SES) adults who smoke and are unable or unwilling to quit smoking will lead to: a) substitution of cigarette smoking with EC or NP; and b) reduced biological indicators of tobacco use and harm relative to those continuing to smoke as usual. This study also examines the feasibility and acceptability of providing EC or NP to help substitution of combustible cigarettes, exploring willingness to participate, continuing with the study, and barriers to substitution through interviews. This project will enroll 45 low SES adults who smoke and will be randomized to one of the three groups that will be followed for 8 weeks: EC, NP, or smoking as usual. The first study hypothesis is that participants receiving EC or NP will smoke fewer cigarettes per day and have lower cigarette dependence at Week 8 relative to their baseline level, and when compared to the control group. The second hypothesis is that those in the EC or NP group will have greater cigarette abstinence than those smoking as usual at Week 8. There are no anticipated differences between those receiving EC and NP. The third hypothesis is that biological indicators of tobacco use and harm will be lower in those receiving EC or NP relative to their baseline level, and when compared to the control group. The hypothesis is that these biological indicators will be lower in those receiving NP than EC.
This is a single site, phase 1 study of dmLT as a mucosal adjuvant to control fecal viral shedding when used in combination with intradermally administered fractional dose trivalent IPV (fIPV). It will be a 2-arm, randomized, double-blind controlled trial of intradermal fIPV versus fIPV+dmLT in healthy adults with a monovalent oral polio vaccine (OPV) challenge administered as a test of mucosal immunity. A maximum of 30 healthy subjects will be recruited, all of whom will have received IPV only as part of their primary childhood immunization series (cohort 1); they will be randomized 2:1 to receive fIPV-dmLT or fIPV alone. A maximum of 27 participants will be recruited from an earlier pilot study population exposed to fIPV+/-dmLT and will provide follow-up samples for immunologic studies only (cohort 2).
This is a study to compare safety and efficacy of inhaled isoflurane administered via the Sedaconda ACD-S device system versus intravenous propofol for sedation of mechanically ventilated patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting.