There are about 2500 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Ukraine. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Primary Objective: To assess the effect of dupilumab on sleep Secondary Objectives: - To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on additional patient reported sleep outcomes - To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on objective sleep assessment - To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on asthma symptoms - To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on lung function - To evaluate the safety of dupilumab
Pneumonia caused by coronavirus infection COVID-19 is characterized by a combination of several dangerous factors that consistently worsen the patient's condition: viral lung damage early in the disease; a sharp increase in inflammation on the background of an unbalanced immune response ("cytokine storm"); joining a bacterial infection. The condition of patients deteriorates significantly mostly at cytokine storm development. The damaging of a large volume of lung tissue leads to develops of respiratory failure, respiratory distress syndrome, or shock. Ventilatory support becomes ineffective and patients die. There are reports of the effectiveness of Human Normal Immunoglobulin for Intravenous Administration (IVIG) high doses when used as part of complex therapy in patients with pneumonia caused by coronavirus COVID-19. In particular, IVIG has a positive effect on survival rates, overall disease course, duration of stay in the intensive care unit, and ventilatory support duration. The probable mechanism of action of high-dose IVIG therapy is considered to be a regulatory effect on the immune system. Similar is the known and confirmed effectiveness of IVIG for autoimmune diseases (Kavasaky disease, Guillain Barre syndrome, Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, Multifocal motor neuropathy). This trial to assesses the Efficacy of IVIG (medication trade name - Bioven, manufactured by Biopharma Plasma LLC) in the High Immunomodulatory Dose in Complex Treatment of Severe Pneumonia Caused by COVID-19 / SARS-CoV-2
The main aim of the investigator's study is to propose combination of local anesthetics and adjuvants that provides both adequate anesthesia during surgery and prolonged post-operative analgesia.
Study D5290C00008 is a Phase 2, open-label, uncontrolled, single-dose study to evaluate the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetic(s) (PK), occurrence of antidrug antibody (ADA), and efficacy of nirsevimab in immunocompromised children who are ≤ 24 months of age at the time of dose administration. Approximately 100 subjects will be enrolled. Subjects will be followed for approximately 1 year after dose administration.
This is an efficacy and safety study of olaparib alone or in combination with bevacizumab being compared to bevacizumab with a fluoropyrimidine in participants with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer who have not progressed following first-line induction. The primary hypotheses are: Olaparib + Bevacizumab is superior to a fluoropyrimidine + Bevacizumab with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR); Olaparib is superior to a fluoropyrimidine + Bevacizumab with respect to PFS using RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR. As of amendment 5 study enrollment is being discontinued and study participants randomized to one of the two experimental arms (olaparib plus bevacizumab or olaparib monotherapy) must discontinue study intervention. Participants who are still on study treatment will no longer have tumor response assessments by BICR.
Pharmacokinetic, Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity Between Patients with Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis Receiving Humira® and Patients with Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of vortioxetine versus desvenlafaxine after 8 weeks of treatment in patients that have tried one available treatment without getting the full benefit
This is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, two-arm, Phase II study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of giredestrant versus anastrozole (in the window-of-opportunity phase) and giredestrant plus palbociclib compared with anastrozole plus palbociclib (in the neoadjuvant phase) in postmenopausal women with untreated, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative, early breast cancer. The study consists of a screening period of up to 28 days, a window-of-opportunity phase for 14 days, followed by a neoadjuvant treatment phase for 16 weeks (four 28-day cycles), surgery, and an end of study visit (28 days after the final dose of study treatment).
The reason for this study is to see if the study drug LY3471851 (NKTR-358) is safe and effective in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
The comparator drug (Zoladex 3.6 mg) is approved for use as a thinning agent for the endometrium prior to endometrial ablation. The dosing recommendation is one or two depots with each depot given four weeks apart. When two depots are administered, surgery should be performed within two to four weeks following administration of the second depot.