There are about 2143 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Slovakia. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Researchers are looking for a better way to treat people who have macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). In people with RVO, a blood vessel that carries blood away from the retina (vein) becomes blocked. The retina is the very back part of the eye. The blocked vein causes fluid and blood to leak into the retina and thereby causes a swelling of the macula (the center of the retina responsible for fine vision). This swelling is called macular edema. When a vein in the retina is blocked, the levels of a protein called vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) rises. VEGF helps the growth of new blood vessels. This can lead to macular edema and may cause the vision to become blurry. The study treatment intravitreal (IVT) aflibercept is given as an injection into the eye. It works by blocking VEGF and this can help repair vision problems related to RVO. IVT aflibercept is already available and is prescribed by doctors as the standard of care treatment for macula edema secondary to RVO. Standard of care is a treatment that medical experts consider most appropriate for a disease. Standard of care is given every 4 weeks in people with macula edema secondary to RVO. While repeated injections of aflibercept may prevent worsening of vision, it may place a burden on the patient. However, a higher amount (8 mg) compared to the standard of care (2 mg) of IVT aflibercept is being tested in studies. This higher amount could be given less often. The amount of IVT aflibercept given is measured in milligrams, also known as mg. The main purpose of this study is to learn how well a higher amount of the study treatment aflibercept works in people with macular edema secondary to RVO. To answer this, researchers will measure changes in vision called best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the study participants between study start and after 36 weeks of treatment. Changes will then be compared between those participants who received the higher amount of IVT aflibercept and those that received standard of care. To learn how safe the study treatment is in the participants, the researchers will count the number of participants from study start and up to 64 weeks later that have: - adverse events - serious adverse events "Adverse events" are any medical problems that the participants have during a study. Doctors keep track of all adverse events that happen in studies, even if they do not think they might be related to the study treatments. An adverse event is considered "serious" when it leads to death, puts the participants' lives at risk, requires hospitalization, causes disability, causes a baby being born with medical problems or is otherwise medically important. Dependent on the treatment group, the participants will either receive the higher amount of aflibercept or standard of care as an intravitreal injection for up to 60 weeks. The study will consist of a test (screening) phase, a treatment phase and an end of study phase. Each participant will be in the study for up to 64 weeks. One visit to the study site is planned during the screening phase, followed by visits approximately every 4 weeks (16 in total) during treatment and one visit at the end of the study. During the study, the study doctors and their team will: - check patients' eye health using various eye examination techniques - measure patients' eye vision (BCVA) - take blood and urine samples - do physical examinations - check vital signs - examine heart health using electrocardiogram (ECG) - do pregnancy tests in women of childbearing age In addition, participants will be asked to fill a questionnaire on vision-related quality of life.
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LY3871801 in adult participants with active moderately-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an immune-mediated disease associated with inflammation of multiple organ systems. This study will assess how safe and effective upadacitinib is in treating adult participants with moderately to severely active SLE. Adverse events and change in the disease activity will be assessed. Upadacitinib is an approved drug for rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondylarthritis and is being developed for the treatment of SLE. This study is "double-blinded", which means that neither the trial participants nor the study doctors will know who will be given upadacitinib and who will be given placebo (does not contain treatment drug) . This study comprised of 3 sub studies. In Study 1 and Study 2, study doctors put the participants in 1 of the 2 groups, called treatment arms. Each group receives a different treatment. There is a 1 in 2 chance that participants will be assigned to placebo. Eligible participants from Study 1 and Study 2 will enter Study 3 at week 52 to receive specific doses of upadacitinib based on their disease activity and their original treatment assignment in Study 1 or 2. Approximately 500 participants diagnosed with SLE will be enrolled in each of the Study 1 and Study 2 in approximately 320 sites across the world. Participants will receive oral tablets of upadacitinib or matching placebo once daily for 52 weeks in Study 1 and Study 2. Eligible participants from Study 1 and Study 2 will receive oral tablets of upadacitinib once daily for 52 weeks in Study 3. There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or clinic. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.
BS-02 is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 dose escalation study to assess the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of FluBHPVE6E7, in women infected with HPV-16. with cervical cytological evaluation negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), or low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN1).
Determining expiratory time constants in mechanically ventilated patients
Despite optimal anticoagulation therapy of patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT), there is still high number of patients suffering from post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) due to the chronic venous occlusion, suboptimal collateralization, and venous valvular dysfunction. Last two decades endovascular catheter-based treatment modalities have been tested and used in an attempt to reduce incidence and symptoms of PTS in selected patients. Especially, patients with extensive iliofemoral DVT have an increased risk of PTS. In an effort to accelerate thrombus dissolution or thrombus extraction, the endovascular removal of acute venous thrombus has been introduced as therapeutic option in patients with extensive iliofemoral DVT. Randomized trials of catheter-based strategies for thrombus removal have documented improved vein patency, preserved valves function, and reduced post-thrombotic syndrome. The aim of our study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different types of endovascular methods of treatment followed by anticoagulation therapy in patients with acute extensive DVT. Retrospective multicentre analysis of app 100 patients scheduled for endovascular treatment of extensive DVT. The results of mechanical/pharmacomechanical thrombectomy followed by local catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT), will be compared with CDT alone, or with ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis. The 24-month incidence of PTS assessed by Villalta scoring system, major bleeding complications, the rate of venous recanalization, recurrence of DVT, and other end-points will be evaluated.
This phase 2 study is part of regulatory commitments in the United States (PSP) and Europe (PIP) to evaluate cefepime-enmetazobactam in paediatric participants with cUTI to support extension of the indication for cefepime-enmetazobactam to children with cUTI.
This study is open to adults with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). The purpose of this study is to find out whether a medicine called spesolimab helps people with HS. People who have previously taken specific medicines such as immunosuppressive biologics other than Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors cannot take part. This study has 2 parts. In Part 1, participants are divided into 4 groups of almost equal size. 3 groups get different doses of spesolimab, 1 group gets placebo. All participants get injections into a vein or under the skin. Placebo injections look like spesolimab injections, but do not contain any medicine. Every participant has an equal chance of being in each group. In the beginning, participants get the study medicine every week and later every 2 weeks. After 4 months, participants in the placebo group switch to spesolimab treatment. In Part 2, participants are divided into 2 groups. One group gets a suitable dose of spesolimab that was found in Part 1 of the study. The other group gets placebo. After 4 months, participants in the placebo group switch to spesolimab treatment. Participants join only one of the two parts. They are in the study for about 1 year. During this time, they visit the study site in the beginning every week and later every 2 weeks. Some of the visits can be done at the participant's home instead of the study site. The doctors regularly check participants' HS symptoms. The results are compared between the groups to see whether spesolimab works. The doctors also regularly check participants' general health and take note of any unwanted effects.
This is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous (IV) ganaxolone versus placebo co-administered with IV antiepileptic drug (AED) according to standard of care for the treatment of RSE. Approximately 70 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive ganaxolone IV solution or placebo IV solution along with standard of care (SOC) IV AED.
Determine the efficacy of lumbar medial branch neurotomy by radiofrequency and cryoablation in patients with chronic low back pain