There are about 2115 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Slovakia. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The goal of the study is to monitor and evaluate the implementation of interventions that aim to increase HPV & MMR vaccines among underserved communities across four European countries: Greece, Netherlands, Poland, and Slovakia. The interventions will target identified health systems barriers in an earlier phase of the project. The interventions that will be implemented employ trusted community members as health promotors whom will provide educational sessions on HPV and MMR vaccination to the target groups. In addition, the cost-effectiveness of vaccine uptake strategies for the target groups is being evaluated. The main research question is: to what extent is the multicomponent tailored intervention effective to increase MMR/HPV intention and vaccine uptake in the target population in Greece, Netherlands, Poland and Slovakia?
Alcohol-associated hepatitis is a clinical syndrome distinct from steatohepatitis or liver cirrhosis. It is associated with high mortality and characterized by an absence of effective treatment, while corticosteroids, which are currently used as the first-line treatment are effective only in a subpopulation of patients and only on 28-days survival - their effect on survival does not last beyond this interval. The proposed study is a complex exploratory study of alcohol-associated hepatitis with several epidemiology- and prognosis-related aims.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of golcadomide in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) chemotherapy vs placebo in combination with R-CHOP chemotherapy in participants with previously untreated high-risk large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL).
This is a Phase III, international, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, double-dummy, active-controlled, event-driven study in patients with chronic HF and impaired kidney function who had a recent HF event. The aim is to evaluate the effect of balcinrenone/dapagliflozin vs dapagliflozin, given once daily on top of other classes of SoC, on CV death and HF events.
This study is a retrospective study trying to find the predictive factors for medullary thyroid aggressiveness in terms of tumor metastasis and patients' survival.
The purpose of this study is to measure the efficacy and safety of baxdrostat/dapagliflozin in participants ≥ 18 years of age with CKD and HTN. This study consists of a screening, a 4-week dapagliflozin run-in period for participants naïve to SGLT2i at baseline; a 24-month double-blind period in which participants will receive either baxdrostat/dapagliflozin or dapagliflozin; and a 6-week open-label period in which all participants will discontinue baxdrostat/placebo and receive dapagliflozin alone. Site visits will take place at 2-, 4-, 8-, and 16- weeks following randomisation. Thereafter visits will occur approximately every 4 months, until the 24-month visit at which time baxdrostat/placebo will be discontinued. Participants will continue open-label dapagliflozin for another 6-weeks (approximately), where reassessment of GFR will occur for the primary efficacy endpoint. In the event of premature discontinuation of blinded study intervention, participants will continue in the study and receive open-label dapagliflozin monotherapy, unless the participant meets dapagliflozin specific discontinuation criteria, in which case all study interventions will be discontinued.
The improvement or preservation of quality of life (QoL) is one of the three pillars of the European Union (EU) Mission on Cancer, which underpins the needs of patients from cancer diagnosis throughout treatment, survivorship, and advanced terminal stages. Clinical studies and real-world data show that the use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for QoL assessment in routine oncology practice has positive effects on patient wellbeing and healthcare resource utilization. However, full implementation of PROMs is not yet part of standard of care and is not adequately considered in cancer policies and programs. A comprehensive tool incorporating the perspective of patients at different stages of the disease trajectory and widely applicable across Europe is still lacking. The European Oncology Quality of Life Toolkit (EUonQoL-Kit) is a unified patient-centred tool for the assessment of QoL, developed from preferences and priorities of people with past or current cancer experience. The EUonQoL-Kit includes three electronic questionnaires, specifically designed for different disease phases (patients in active treatment, survivors, and patients in palliative care), available in both static and dynamic (Computer Adaptive Testing, CAT) versions and in several European languages. This is a multicentre observational study, with the following aims: - The primary aim is to perform the psychometric validation of the EUonQoL-Kit. - Secondary aims are to assess its acceptability, to validate the CAT version, and to provide estimates of QoL across different European countries. The EUonQoL-Kit will be administered to a sample of cancer patients and survivors from 46 European cancer centres. The sample will include patients in active treatment (group A), survivors (group B), and patients in Palliative Care (group C). Each centre will recruit 100 patients (40 from group A, 30 from group B, 30 from group C), for an overall sample size of 4,600 patients (at least 4,000 patients are assumed to be enrolled, due to an expected lower recruitment rate of 10-15%). Three sub-samples of patients (each corresponding to 10% of the total sample for each centre) will fill in an additional questionnaire: - EORTC QLQ-C30, to test concurrent validity. - Live-CAT version, to test the feasibility of such implementation. - EUonQoL-Kit, 2-7 days after the first completion, to assess test-retest reliability.
The goal of this multicentre, prospective, randomized, open, blinded for evaluation of end point (PROBE) controlled parallel-group superiority trial, is to compare the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy and cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) regarding freedom from atrial fibrillation (%) assessed by an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM), ECG tracing or Holter at 12 months in patients with persistent AF. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: - Will first-line cryoballoon ablation for PVI compared to AAD, result in 25 % higher freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias lasting > 6 minutes at 12 months (primary outcome) excluding three months initial blanking period, in patients with symptomatic and recurrent persistent AF? - Will first-line cryoablation for PVI, compared to AAD result in a superior improvement in health related Quality of Life (HRQoL), AF/AT burden, AF/AT progression and reversion, more reverse atrial remodeling, cognitive function, healthcare utilization with associated costs, better safety, at 12-24-36 months as compared with drug use? Participants will be randomized 1:1 to first-line PVI using the cryoballoon or to first-line antiarrhythmic drug therapy and during 3 years follow-up undergo regular; - Continuous ECG monitoring for assessment of first AF recurrence and AF burden using an implantable cardiac monitor, - Regular echocardiographic exams for reverse atrial remodelling assessment, - HRQoL questionnaires - Assessment of cognitive function - Atrial fibrillation evaluation regarding structured characterisation and AF progression/regression - Assessment of Health care use and costs - Safety
The study will aim to find out if the drug andexanet alfa is safe and effective in preventing major bleeding during urgent surgery or invasive procedures. The study will compare the use of andexanet alfa to the usual care given at the study center.
SIRIUS is the "serious" response to the prevalence of liver cirrhosis in Slovakia. We plan to screen adult Slovaks without acute or life-threatening comorbidity and without known liver disease (except from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease) for liver fibrosis by transient elastography (in community) or FIB-4 score (in outpatient clinics).