There are about 6461 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Russian Federation. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The objective of the current study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of BI 10773 in 2 different doses compared to Metformin or to Sitagliptin given for 78 weeks in different modalities of treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
The purpose of this study was to determine the dose-response curve for the MRI-based efficacy of BAF312 compared with placebo in patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS), and to characterize its safety and tolerability for the selection of an optimal dose in a later phase III study. Study Design Rationale An adaptive design was chosen to characterize the dose response curve of BAF312. In a first period of study ("Period 1"), three doses of BAF312 and placebo were tested for MRI efficacy. Based on an interim analysis (IA) after 3 months of treatment, two additional active doses for period 2 wereselected , thus allowing to optimize the overall determination of the dose response curve with 5 data points of active treatment, and placebo. The doses were kept blinded. The use of Modeling and Simulation allowed to establish the full range and dynamics of the dose-response curve in silico, and hence the definition of the optimal dose for later phase III studies. The choice of placebo as treatment control was essential to obtain information on the specific compared to non-specific effects of active treatment and provides the best way of evaluating the efficacy and of assessing the true safety and tolerability profile of BAF312. Short-term placebo exposure (6 (Period 1) or 3 (Period 2) months, respectively) was unlikely to lead to longer term differences in outcomes [Polman, 2008]. The use of an adaptive design strategy contributed to a significant reduction of placebo exposure, both in terms of the number of patients and duration, as compared to conventional trial models. Patients having completed the study within the protocol might be eligible for the Extension Phase study where they receive long-term BAF312 treatment (a separate protocol).
The aim of this study are to - assess the efficacy of Biostate® [Study Product (SP)] in subjects with Haemophilia A - compare the pharmacokinetics of Biostate® [SP] with the previously marketed product Biostate® (here referred to as Biostate® [Reference Product (RP)]). This study is divided into 3 parts: Part 1: Cross-over pharmacokinetic (PK) component. PK subjects will be randomised to determine the order in which they receive the two study products. This part of the study is double-blinded. Part 2: Efficacy component. All subjects will receive Biostate® [SP] as required to manage their haemophilia condition for an estimated period of 6 months (or minimum of 50 exposure days) to assess efficacy and safety of the product. This part of the study is open-label. Part 3: Repeat pharmacokinetic assessment. Subjects who participated in Part 1 (PK component) will undergo a repeat PK assessment on Day 180 following administration of Biostate® [SP].
This study is designed to assess the safety and efficacy of RAD001 monotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer which has progressed after one or two lines of prior chemotherapy.
The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of botulinum toxin type A on patients with overactive bladder as a result of spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis. This is a follow-up study to two Allergan sponsored studies (NCT00311376 and NCT00461292).
The objective of this study is to investigate efficacy, safety and tolerability of ONO-8539 in patients with overactive bladder.
The purpose of this Phase III study was to confirm the value of adding everolimus to weekly paclitaxel and trastuzumab as treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer.
The purpose of this study is to obtain data on the safety and efficacy of Ultravist application in usual daily use.The radiologist will administer the contrast medium to the patient as he/she would have done without the study. No other examinations will be performed than would have been done routinely.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide versus investigator choice in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.
The aim of this international prospective, non-interventional post-marketing surveillance study is to obtain data on treatment procedures, long-term safety and efficacy and patient acceptance of KOGENATE Bayer in treatment of patients with haemophilia A under daily-life treatment conditions.