There are about 3194 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Portugal. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Research question: If adults with bone or joint infection have local antibiotic therapy, can they do without prolonged treatment with antibiotics by mouth (oral) or injection? Adults with bone or joint infections are usually given long courses of oral antibiotics or into a vein (intravenous) following surgery. It is also safe to give antibiotics directly into the bone or joint at the time of surgery: this is called local antibiotic therapy. This study investigates whether using local antibiotic therapy would allow shorter courses of oral or intravenous antibiotics, in order to limit antibiotic resistance, side effects and cost. This study compares short against long courses of oral or intravenous antibiotics for adults who have been given appropriate local antibiotic therapy to treat bone or joint infection. Patients who can take part will be randomly divided into two groups within 7 days of surgery. One group will stop oral or intravenous antibiotics, while the other group will continue for 4 weeks or more (standard treatment). Adults with bone and joint infections who have already had surgery and local antibiotic therapy will be invited. Patients will not take part if they need intravenous antibiotics for another reason, or if their infection is caused by bacteria resistant to the antibiotic(s) used in their local antibiotic therapy. Main measurement: how many patients' infections return within 12 months after surgery. This will be decided by a group of doctors who do not know what treatment the patient received. Other important measurements: serious adverse events; side-effects; quality of life; cost of treatment. Patients will be asked questions at their usual clinic visits, and will be given a questionnaire at the start of treatment and 1 year later.
Compare rates of medical complications, recurrence and outcome in 2 randomized groups of patients with surgical chronic subdural hematomas. The intervention group will be assigned to early mobilization (within 12 hours of the surgical procedure). The control group will be assigned to bed rest for 48 hours.
This is a non-interventional, multi-country, multi-centre, multiple cohort prospective study, with retrospective collection of prior medical/treatment history data from medical records, designed to assess the real-world outcomes and safety of atezolizumab for indications in the existing label in the real world setting of routine clinical practice.
This Phase 3 clinical study compares the efficacy and safety of elacestrant to the standard of care (SoC) options of fulvestrant or an aromatase inhibitor (AI) in women and men with breast cancer whose disease has advanced on at least one endocrine therapy including a CDK4/6 inhibitor in combination with fulvestrant or an aromatase inhibitor (AI) .
The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and key electrical performance of the INVICTA leads equipped with DF4 connector: ACTIVE fixation type models (single and dual coil: INVICTA 1CR, INVICTA 2CR) and PASSIVE fixation type models (single and dual coil: INVICTA 1CT, INVICTA 2CT).
This is a randomized, active-controlled, open-label study of pembrolizumab (Pembro) given prior to surgery and pembrolizumab in combination with standard of care radiotherapy (with or without cisplatin), as post-surgical therapy in treatment naïve participants with newly diagnosed Stage III/IVA, resectable, locoregionally advanced, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). Efficacy outcomes will be stratified by programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) status. The primary hypothesis is that pembrolizumab given before surgery and after surgery in combination with radiotherapy (with or without cisplatin) improves event-free survival compared to radiotherapy (with or without cisplatin) given after surgery alone.
To determine the long-term (approximately 2 years) nephroprotective potential of treatment with sparsentan as compared to an angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vutrisiran (ALN-TTRSC02) in participants with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (hATTR amyloidosis). Participants will receive vutrisiran subcutaneous (SC) injection once every 3 months (q3M) or the reference comparator patisiran intravenous (IV) injection once every 3 weeks (q3w) during the 18 month Treatment Period. This study will use the placebo arm of the APOLLO study (NCT01960348) as an external comparator for the primary and most other efficacy endpoints during the 18 Month Treatment Period. Following the 18 Month Treatment Period, all participants will be randomized to receive vutrisiran SC injection once every 6 months (q6M) or q3M in the Randomized Treatment Extension (RTE) Period.
This study aims to i) assess the short-, mid- and long-term effectiveness of a patient-centred community-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programme during during acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD); ii) establish the minimal clinical important differences for PR in AECOPD for clinical and patient-reported outcome measures; and iii) evaluate patients' perspectives and self-reported impact of the PR programme. Patients with AECOPD will be recruited via clinicians at hospitals and primary care centres. Sociodemographic, anthropometric and clinical data; vital signs and peripheral oxygen saturation; symptoms (dyspnoea, fatigue, cough and sputum); lung function; physical activity level; peripheral muscle strength; functional status; exercise tolerance; impact of the disease and health-related quality of life will be collected within 24h-48h of the AECOPD diagnosis. Then, patients will be randomly allocated to either conventional treatment or conventional treatment plus PR. After 3 weeks, all outcome measures will be reassessed. Additionally, follow-ups at 2, 6 and 12 months will be performed through phone calls to assess the number of recurrent AECOPD, healthcare utilization and mortality. Conventional treatment will consist on daily medical treatment prescribed by the physician (i.e., medication). Community-based PR will involve 6 sessions (2 times per week) of breathing retraining and airway clearance techniques, exercises for thoracic mobility, expansion and flexibility, cardiorespiratory exercise training, education and psychosocial support. It is expected that, by including PR in the treatment of patients with AECOPD, they will express greater improvements in a shorter period of time and experience a decrease number of re-exacerbations and healthcare utilization.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of niraparib in combination with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) compared to AAP and placebo.