There are about 2455 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in New Zealand. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This is an open-label, multicenter, and nonrandomized dose escalation and dose expansion study to evaluate BGB-26808 as monotherapy or in combination with tislelizumab in participants with advanced solid tumors. The main purpose of this study is to explore the recommended dosing for BGB-26808.
This three-part, Phase 1 protocol will be the first clinical study of AB-101. Parts 1 and 2 will be a Phase 1a SAD/MAD of AB-101 in healthy adult subjects. Part 3 will be a Phase 1b dose-ranging assessment of AB-101 in non-cirrhotic Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) subjects.
The INNER-B-APAC post-market clinical follow-up study is undertaken to demonstrate the safety and clinical performance of the E-nside TAAA Multibranch Stent Graft System used in endovascular treatment of patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.
This is a Phase III open-label study to assess if camizestrant improves outcomes compared to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer with intermediate-high or high risk for disease recurrence who completed definitive locoregional therapy (with or without chemotherapy). The planned duration of treatment in either arm within the study will be 7 years.
Demonstrate the safety and performance of the Zenith LAA Occlusion System and procedure to occlude the Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) from the left atrium (LA) using a minimally invasive technique. Indication - LAA closure in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, with an ostial diameter between 18 mm and 26 mm
This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ANB032 in subjects with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD).
The purpose of this study is to learn if V940 which is an individualized neoantigen therapy (INT; formerly, called messenger ribonucleic acid [mRNA]-4157) with pembrolizumab (MK-3475) is safe and prevents cancer from returning in people with high-risk melanoma. Researchers want to know if V940 with pembrolizumab is better than receiving pembrolizumab alone at preventing the cancer from returning.
This is a Phase Ib/II, open-label, multicenter, randomized platform study to evaluate neoadjuvant immunotherapy combinations in participants with resectable HCC. The study is designed with the flexibility to open new treatment arms as new agents become available, close existing treatment arms that demonstrate minimal clinical activity or unacceptable toxicity, or modify the participant population.
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of tiragolumab, an anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody, when administered in combination with atezolizumab and bevacizumab as first-line treatment, in participants with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of a maximum output shock for cardioverting atrial fibrillation between two commonly used defibrillators in New Zealand . These machines have different maximum energy outputs, and to date no head-to-head comparison cardioverting atrial fibrillation between the two has been undertaken. The main question it aims to answer is whether either device is more likely to cardiovert patients referred for atrial fibrillation. Participants will be randomized to undergo cardioversion with one of two defibrillators at either 200J or 360J. Participants in each arm will undergo up to three shocks at the energy-level to which they have been randomized, using a standardized procedure. For participants randomized to the lower energy level who fail to return to normal rhythm after three shocks, they will be given a fourth shock at the higher energy level. All participants will then be asked to undertake a blood test the day following the cardioversion, and receive a follow up phone call. These are to ensure there is no difference in the safety of the procedure between the two energy levels. It is worth noting that these two components of the study (the blood test and phone call) are the only additional time commitment that is expected to be involved if you choose to participate in the study.