There are about 5161 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Norway. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NIS793 in combination with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel and placebo in first-line metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). This study aims to explore whether blockade of Transforming Growth Factor β (TGFβ) in combination with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel can reduce fibrosis in PDAC, restore chemo-sensitivity and ultimately lead to improvements in overall survival (OS) and other clinically relevant outcomes.
This is a feasibility study and a pilot trial of a multilingual support intervention with the aim to improve language training for Norwegian refugees by systematically using the participants' primary language to support the learning of the new language. The study is conducted in three Norwegian municipalities with the aim to evaluate feasibility for a full-scale randomised controlled trial. The pilot trial will include at least 30 participants, with two thirds allocated to the treatment group and one third to the control group. The intervention will be implemented as an add on to ordinary classroom settings. The treatment group will receive seven hours multilingual support weekly. The control group will receive the same amount of support, but from a person without multilingual qualifications. The Norwegian Directorate of Integration and Diversity (IMDi) are funding the project and have reviewed the protocol.
The main aim is to study in the real world setting the effectiveness of Cladribine tablets in terms of Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) and disability progression, in participants who switched from a first line Disease Modifying Drug (DMD) (Interferons, Glatiramer Acetate, Teriflunomide, (Dymethyl fumarate) [DMF]) to treatment with Cladribine tablets in routine clinical practice.
Stroke is a major cause of severe cognitive and physical disability. Despite the high and increasing incidence, and large health, economic, social and personal consequences, studies designed to remedy cognitive impairments and improve rehabilitation care following stroke are lacking. A promising line of research have shown that weak electrical current (tDCS) can be a safe, cost-effective, and potent treatment when combined with other rehablitational approaches. The underlying mechanism is assumed that tDCS facilitates neuronal signaling, improving plasticity and facilitating rehablitational outcome. But further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms at hand, and to better evaluate the potential clinical utility. The scope for the current project is to investigate both cognitive and neuronal effects of tDCS in combination with cognitive training , with the ultimate goal to improve current rehabilitational healthcare. To achieve this we will use multimodal MRI, EEG, and a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological asessment, to describe and evaluate the effect of tDCS in rehabilitation purposes.
Improved cancer survival has led to increased attention on long-term health and quality of life (QoL) among the survivors. Both the cancer diagnosis and intensive treatments increase the risk of late effects which may interfere with daily physical, psychological and social functioning, and thereby negatively affect their QoL. Well-documented late-effects among cancer survivors are second cancer, cardio-vascular disease, pain, hormone disturbances, mental distress and chronic fatigue (CF). CF is a subjective experience of substantial lack of energy, exhaustion and cognitive difficulties lasting for six months or longer. CF is one of the most common and distressing late effects after cancer, affecting 15-35 % of survivors, often for years beyond treatment. Despite the high prevalence and the huge negative consequences of CF on daily functioning and QoL and the economic and societal costs, effective treatment of CF and standardized follow-up care are currently lacking. CF is a complex condition best understood as a multifactorial phenomenon. Our and other research groups have examined various cohorts of cancer survivors in order to identify behavioral-, psychological-, and biological factors associated with CF, that can form the basis for targeted interventions. So far, few treatable biological factors have been identified, even though immune activation, flattened diurnal cortisol slopes and a blunted cortisol response to stress have been demonstrated in small studies among cancer survivors suffering from CF. On the other hand, several modifiable behavioral factors including emotional distress, physical inactivity, sleep disturbances and unhealthy diets are found to be associated with CF. So far, most of the interventions aiming to reduce fatigue during and shortly after cancer treatment have targeted only one of these factors at a time, with small to moderate effect sizes. No prior study has examined if CF in cancer survivors is better treated by a complex intervention targeting combinations of these factors, an approach which seems logical due to the complexity of the symptom. The Division of Cancer Medicine at Oslo University Hospital (OUH) presently offers limited rehabilitation programs, including patient education, physical exercise, cognitive behavioral program and nutrition counselling to cancer survivors with CF. However, these programs are not offered as an interdisciplinary intervention integrated in a standardized patient care pathway, and the effects of these interventions have not been assessed. Based on the investigators clinical experience and published studies on single-targeted interventions, the investigators hypothesize that a complex intervention including psycho-educational elements, physical exercise and nutrition counseling delivered as a standardized patient care pathway is well-founded and doable, and will improve fatigue, functioning and QoL in cancer survivors with CF. During the fall of 2021, the investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with the overall objective to improve fatigue in lymphoma survivors with CF. To uncover strengths and weaknesses with the planned RCT, i.e. the inclusion procedures, the assessments and the complex intervention, the investigators are now conducting a small one-armed feasibility study before the RCT during spring 2021.
This is a phase III study of efficacy and safety of secukinumab versus placebo, in combination with glucocorticoid taper regimen, in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA)
The main objective of this pilot study is to assess distant procedures, study experiences and feasibility of a planned randomized controlled trial investigating the use of a mHealth support tool on physical activity for individuals with intellectual disability.
The PREOPANC-3 study is a randomized, multicenter, phase 3 trial. Patients with resectable pancreatic cancer will be randomly assigned (1:1) to 8 cycles of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX followed by surgery and 4 cycles of adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX (arm 1) or to upfront surgery followed by 12 cycles of adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX (arm 2). The primary objective of the trial is to determine whether perioperative mFOLFIRINOX improves overall survival compared with adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (VRd) induction followed by a single administration of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) versus VRd induction followed by Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma participants for whom ASCT is not planned as initial therapy in terms of Progression Free Survival (PFS).
Inflammatory joint diseases (IJD) are autoimmune diseases with common symptoms of joint inflammation, pain, stiffness and fatigue. Compared to the general population, this large patient-group has an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CVD-related mortality. Patients with IJD call for improved CVD screening and risk management as well as access to evidence-based non-pharmacological treatment alternatives. Evidence supports high intensity training (HIIT) in mitigating risk of CVD and inflammation, but the evidence of these cardioprotective benefits is unclear in patients with IJD and the feasibility of HIIT protocols in daily clinical care needs to be addressed. Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is an important physiological marker and highly correlated to risk of CVD. Despite strong recommendations, routine assessment of CRF is seldom performed in clinical care. The ExeHeart study will assess the potential cardioprotective and disease-modifying effect of HIIT in IJD in a randomized controlled trial. Furthermore, the ExeHeart-study will report on the validity of non-exercise measures of cardiorespiratory fitness (eCRF) measures for use in daily clinical care. Additionally, we will explore the feasibility of HIIT by addressing adherence and fidelity to the HIIT treatment protocol in a primary care setting