There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
It has been shown that person-specific factors, such as the fecal microbiome, influenced postprandial glycemia. The small intestine is the site of nutrient digestion and absorption. The small intestine microbiota is amendable by dietary changes, and plays a key role in host adaptability to dietary variations. The role of the human small intestine microbiota in regulating postprandial glycemic responses towards food products will be investigated. First a screening will take place with to choose the test products that elicit most differential glucose responses and to select subjects with differential postprandial response to the same food product. The study will be a 6-day randomized cross-over trial with two test days. Four test (food) products, each containing 50 gram carbohydrates, and an oral glucose tolerance test will be provided to participants. Twenty men or women (BMI≥25 kg/m2, 40-75 years old) will be included. The main study parameters/endpoints are the food product-induced plasma glucose responses (iAUC) and the small intestine microbiota.
Phase 1/2, dose escalation and expansion study designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of NVL-520, determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and evaluate the antitumor activity in patients with advanced ROS1-positive (ROS1+) NSCLC and other advanced ROS1-positive solid tumors. Phase 1 will determine the RP2D and, if applicable, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of NVL-520 in patients with advanced ROS1-positive solid tumors. Phase 2 will determine the objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) of NVL-520 at the RP2D. Secondary objectives will include the duration of response (DOR), time to response (TTR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and clinical benefit rate (CBR) of NVL-520 in patients with advanced ROS1-positive NSCLC and other solid tumors.
This study aims to quantify the variation in postprandial AA profiles between (and within) individuals after consumption of a poorly digestible plant protein source (Lucerne) and to compare the variation in postprandial AA profiles between a poorly digestible plant protein source and an easy digestible protein source (whey). The study has a randomised, cross-over, controlled design. Two different treatments, all representing a 20g protein load, will be evaluated on five occasions with a washout period of minimum one week between the test days. On test days, research subjects will receive two different protein sources, in the form of a protein drink, in randomised order; on three test days they will receive a poor-digestible protein source, on two test days an easily digestible protein source. Blood will be collected via a catheter before and up-to four hours after protein consumption. Wellbeing, health complaints or other adverse effects will be collected via short questionnaires during each test day. After each test day gastrointestinal complaints will be collected via an online questionnaire.
This study will evaluate the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic profile, and drug-drug interaction (DDI) of AB521 in healthy participants.
The purpose of this trial is to investigate the safety and efficacy of acasunlimab (also known as GEN1046) as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have progressed during or after treatment of previous standard of care
To assess the safety and tolerability profile, in the pre- and perioperative period (up to 30 days post-surgery), of combined modality treatment (CMT) by administering AZD1390 with or without durvalumab and RT concurrently treating newly diagnosed, non-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma patients with DDRi-based CMT, in the specific context of systemic toxicities, wound healing post-surgery and in defining the RP2D for the combinations to support further clinical evaluation.
This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of treatment combinations in cancer immunotherapy (CIT)-naive participants with resectable Stage III melanoma (Cohort 1) and in participants with Stage IV melanoma (Cohort 2). The study is designed with the flexibility to open new treatment arms as new treatments become available, close existing treatment arms that demonstrate minimal clinical activity or unacceptable toxicity, and modify the participant population.
The primary objective is to compare pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab to placebo plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab, with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 as assessed by the investigator. The hypotheses are that pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab is superior to placebo plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab, with respect to PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the investigator for participants with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive tumors (Combined Positive Score [CPS] ≥1) and that pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab is superior to placebo plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab, with respect to PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the investigator for all participants.
Risdiplam works by helping the body produce more survival motor neuron (SMN) protein throughout the body. This means fewer motor neurons - nerve cells that pass impulses from nerves to muscles to cause movement - are lost, which may improve how well muscles work in people with SMA. RO7204239 is an investigational anti-myostatin antibody that is designed to target myostatin. Myostatin plays an important role in the regulation of skeletal muscle size by controlling growth. Inhibiting myostatin may help muscles grow in size and strength. RO7204239 in combination with risdiplam, which is designed to increase the amount of SMN protein throughout the body, has the potential to further improve motor function and clinical outcomes for people living with SMA. This trial will study the safety and efficacy of RO7204239 in combination with risdiplam in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). The trial has two parts; Part 1 is the dose-finding part in SMA patients that are either ambulant (aged 2-10 years) or non-ambulant (aged 5-10 years) within separate cohorts, and Part 2 is the pivotal part in SMA patients aged 2-25 years that are ambulant.
Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma often die from intrahepatic disease because current treatment options are limited. Local treatment using 166Ho-radioembolization (166Ho-RE) offers a safe and effective treatment. Because 166Ho-microspheres are used as a scout dose for treatment simulaton and for the actual treatment itself, a tailored approach can be used. This concept has proven to be more predictive than the 90Y-radioembolization concept (current standard-of-care), which is a based on a surrogate scout dose (i.e. 99mTc-MAA). A personal treatment plan may be used for 166Ho-radioembolization to optimize efficacy, based on scout dose distribution. However, individualized treatment planning inherently leads to treatment doses that deviate from the currently approved 'one-size-fits-all' approach (i.e. 60 Gy average absorbed dose for all patients). Therefore, safety of individualized 166Ho-RE will be evaluated first to validate safety and confirm safety thresholds. These thresholds will be used in subsequent randomized controlled studies.