There are about 21062 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Italy. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Purpose of the study is to test whether study drug BAY1128688 brings relief for pain to women with endometriosis and if so to get a first impression which dose(s) work best.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of Padsevonil administered at individualized doses as adjunctive treatment for subjects with drug-resistant epilepsy.
Background: Problems with handwriting are frustrating and debilitating and affect the majority of people with Parkinson's. Manifest as micrographia it is a distinctive feature of the condition characterised by small handwriting and/or a progressive reduction in size through a sentence[2] coupled with a reduction in writing speed and legibility. In Parkinson's impaired automaticity is thought to contribute to handwriting deficits and attention has been shown to improve both 'consistent' (small handwriting) and 'progressive' (progressive reduction in letter size through a sentence) aspects of the symptom. Moreover, recent interventional studies indicate handwriting may be improved through practice. This study is investigating a novel handwriting practice stimulus to improve symptoms of micrograpthia Question: Is a diverging line cued handwriting intervention potentially more effective at improving symptoms of mircograpthia than a parallel line cued handwriting intervention in people with Parkinson's? Specifically, an assessor blind randomised controlled exploratory trial will: 1. Estatimate the effect of the intervention on measures of: Handwriting amplitude (consistent and progressive reduction), hand writing performance and percieved handwriting difficulties. 2. Explore the appropriateness of these outcome measures 3. Explore the approriateness of eligibilty criteria 4. Explore intervention fidelity 5. Explore participants views of the intervention Design: A phase II exploratory randomised controlled trial of a handwriting intervention with an active comparator control group and blinded assessments Setting: The intervention will be carried out at home Sample size: This study is not designed to determine efficacy. The aim to recruit a total of 50 people (25 people per group) in order to estimate the effects on outcome measures and achieve the aims of this exploratory trial. Assessment: Participants will be asked to follow their usual Parkinson's medication regime and if they have ON and OFF periods, assessments will be carried out during ON state. Duration and follow-up: the assessment is schedule 0Weeks (baseline), 6weeks (end intervention) and 12weeks (follow up). Assessments will be carried out by a researcher blind to trial arm allocation using all outcome measures.
Severe haemophilia B (HB) is a bleeding disorder where a protein made by the body to help make blood clot is either partly or completely missing. This protein is called a clotting factor; with severe haemophilia B, levels of clotting factor IX (FIX) (nine) are very low and affected individuals can suffer life threatening bleeding episodes. HB mainly affects boys and men (normally one in every 30,000 males). Current treatment for HB involves intravenous infusions of factor IX as regular treatment (Prophylaxis) or 'on demand'. On demand treatment is highly effective at stopping bleeding but cannot fully reverse long-term damage that follows after a bleed. Regular treatment can prevent bleeding, however can be invasive for patients and also expensive. This research study aims to test the safety and effectiveness of a gene therapy which produces Factor IX protein in the body. The gene will be given using an inactivated virus called "the vector" ( FLT180a), in a single infusion. The vector has been developed from a virus known as an adeno- associated virus, that has been changed so that it is unable to cause a viral infection in humans. This "inactivated" virus is further altered to carry the Factor IX gene and to make its way within liver cells where Factor IX protein is normally made. Up to three different doses cohorts of FLT180a will be tested, in up to 24 patients with severe haemophilia B. Patients will be recruited from haemophilia centres in the EU and US. Patients will be in the trial for approximately 40 weeks and will undergo procedures including physical examinations, bloods tests, ECGs and liver ultrasounds.
Primary Objectives: - To characterize the safety and tolerability of isatuximab in combination with REGN2810 in participants with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who were naïve to anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-containing therapy, or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progressed on anti-PD-1/PD-L1-containing therapy, and to confirm the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). - To assess the response rate of isatuximab in combination with REGN2810 in participants with either mCRPC who were anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy naive, or NSCLC who progressed on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, or of isatuximab as single agent in participants with mCRPC. Secondary Objectives: - To evaluate the safety of the combination of isatuximab with REGN2810 or isatuximab monotherapy. - To evaluate the immunogenicity of isatuximab and REGN2810. - To characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of isatuximab single agent or in combination with REGN2810, and to characterize the PK of REGN2810 in combination with isatuximab. - To assess overall efficacy of isatuximab in combination with REGN2810 or as a single agent.
The present observational study is aimed at reporting the short-, mid- and long-term outcomes of patients with Disorder of Consciousness (DOC), in Vegetative State (VS) or Minimally Conscious State (MCS), due to a severe Acquired Brain Injury (sABI), after repeated treatments with anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (L-DLPFC), to stimulate recovery of consciousness. The results obtained will also be compared with those of a historical control cohort, before the introduction of tDCS, matched for demographic and clinical characteristics.
TNBC, defined by the lack of immunohistochemical staining for oestrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, and lack of overexpression or amplification of HER2/neu, has an aggressive biological behaviour, marked by increased risk of recurrence and poorer survival compared with hormone receptor-positive subtypes. The key points for the rationale of the present study are: 1. Despite different efforts for improving the outcome of TNBC patients, the median distant-disease free interval for relapsed triple-negative breast cancer is about 1-2 years, and the median survival for metastatic TNBC is approximately one year. 2. International guidelines currently recommend polychemotherapy instead of sequential single agents as first-line treatment in this subgroup of patients, but no data is available at the moment regarding the optimal duration of chemotherapy. 3. There is growing evidence to suggest that platinum-based therapy may have a role in both advanced and early-stage TNBC, though results are not definitive. Three randomized phase II neoadjuvant trials have been reported, two of which demonstrated an improvement in pathological complete response (pCR) rates when carboplatin is added to anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy, though this pCR improvement came at the cost of an increase in toxicity. Definitive results from phase III trials demonstrating improvement in long-term outcomes such as event-free and overall survival are not yet available, and it remains unclear how to optimally incorporate platinums into neoadjuvant therapy, as toxicity is enhanced when platinum is incorporated as an add-on to standard combination chemotherapy backbones. A randomized phase III trial comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine to paclitaxel plus gemcitabine has been published recently. After a median follow-up of 16.3 months in the cisplatin plus gemcitabine group and 15.9 months in the paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group, the hazard ratio for progression-free survival was 0.692 (95% CI 0•523-0•915; pnon-inferiority<0•0001, superiority=0•009. Thus cisplatin plus gemcitabine was both non-inferior to and superior to paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. Median progression-free survival was 7.7 months (95% CI 6.2-9.3) in the cisplatin plus gemcitabine group and 6.5 months (5.8-7.2) in the paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group. 4. In both early and advanced disease settings, response rates appear to be influenced by germ line BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status, and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status has emerged as an important potential biomarker for platinum therapy. Outside of the BRCA mutant setting, there is certainly good reason to believe that there are patients with sporadic TNBC who stand to benefit greatly from a platinum-based approach. Tumour-based assays that detect levels of genomic scarring caused by the accumulation of DNA damage over time secondary to underlying DNA repair defects, such as the Myriad HRD assay, have potential to identify non carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations with "BRCA-like" breast cancer, who may respond to DNA repair- targeted treatment strategies, such as platinum agents. One of the most promising way to improve clinical outcome in poor-risk patients is represented by maintenance therapy with a non-cross resistant regimen after an induction treatment, until disease progression. Nevertheless, the main limit to such a strategy is the choice of chemotherapy agents, considering that patients could be treated for a long period of time The results of the VICTOR-1 study was recently published, the aim of this study was the determination of the maximum tolerated dose of oral metronomic schedule of vinorelbine (VNR) in combination with fixed doses of capecitabine (CAPE), as well as to confirm the safety profile of the combination in a cohort of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients. The results demonstrated a lower incidence of hematological grade 3-4 adverse events (1.1%), in comparison to what published in other series, using the standard schedules of the two drugs. The present study is designed to select the best arm between oral metronomic schedule of vinorelbine (VNR) and combination of oral metronomic schedule VNR with fixed doses of capecitabine (CAPE) as maintenance therapy in advanced TNBC patients responders after an induction treatment.
The primary objective of the placebo-controlled period is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of BIIB092 in participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or with mild AD. The secondary objectives of the placebo-controlled period are to evaluate the efficacy of multiple doses of BIIB092 in slowing cognitive and functional impairment in participants with MCI due to AD or with mild AD, and to evaluate the immunogenicity of BIIB092 after multiple doses in participants with MCI due to AD or with mild AD. The primary objective of the long-term extension period is to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of BIIB092 in participants with MCI due to AD or with mild AD.
The antiplatelet agent clopidogrel is an effective drug for the prevention of thrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes, and is therefore one of the most frequently prescribed drugs worldwide. Accumulating data suggest that the response to clopidogrel is characterised by significant inter-patient variability in the degree of platelet inhibition and the risk of cardiovascular events. Recent research findings have highlighted the role of genetic variations in determining antiplatelet response variability, and this has aroused interest in genotyping all thienopyridine-eligible patients in order to identify those who would be at increased risk of harm if treated with clopidogrel. This is a prospective, multicentre, randomised study enrolling consecutive patients hospitalised because of an ACS with or without ST-segment elevation. The patients are randomised to undergo or not tests for CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*17 and ABCB1 3435 genetic variants immediately after diagnosis. The genotyping is done using a Q3 System (a compact platform that enables the classic laboratory analysis of DNA by means of real-time PCR). The Q3 has been designed as a low entry-cost, portable, point-of-care instrument for foolproof use by unskilled personnel. The patients randomised to the pharmacogenomic arm receive one of the ADP receptor antagonists (clopidogrel/prasugrel/ticagrelor) on the basis of an algorithm that consider genetic and clinical variables. The patients randomised to the standard treatment arm receive clopidogrel or prasugrel or ticagrelor on the basis of the standard of care (clinical algorithm alone). For each patient, a record is made of the occurrence of cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, stroke, BARC-defined bleeding, and definite or probable stent thrombosis. The primary endpoint is the composite of death due to cardiovascular causes, non-fatal MI and stroke. The secondary endpoints is the occurrence of definite or probable stent thrombosis, and BARC-defined major bleeding events (types 3-5).
This will be a 1:1 randomized open label trial. European and outside Europe centres will be involved. Aim of the project is to conduct a head-to-head comparison of effectiveness of two approved disease modifying treatments (DMTs) in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The term effectiveness refers to efficacy in a real life setting: this is intended to be in fact the first pragmatic multi-centre randomised controlled trial to directly assess the effectiveness of the new oral agents approved for MS (fingolimod/FTY versus dimethyl-fumarate/DMF) on disease activity, disability progression, quality of life, functioning and symptoms. It will be a randomized trial taking place in clinical care setting and comparing existing therapies, any of which may constitute standard care for naive patients or sub optimal responders to first-line drugs. Post hoc analysis will also identify the better treatment strategy on the different patient subgroups. Patient overall disease experience will be considered for the first time as the most important outcome. In fact, in addition to classical "no evidence of disease activity" (NEDA), a new composite NEDA taking account also of patient point of view and quality of life, will be proposed. Finally,the specific effectiveness profile of the two DMTs will be addressed, by exploring comparative benefits on different outcomes (disease activity, disability progression, brain atrophy, quality of life, fatigue, psychiatric and cognitive symptoms, medication satisfaction).