There are about 9745 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Israel. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This is a Phase IIIb, single-arm, multicenter, OLE study. Participants receiving ocrelizumab as an investigational medicinal product (IMP) in a Roche sponsored Parent study who continue to receive ocrelizumab or are in safety follow-up at the time of the closure of their respective Parent study (WA21092, WA21093 or WA25046) are eligible for enrollment in this extension study. Participants who will continue ocrelizumab treatment will receive IMP based on the dosage and administration received at the time of rollover from the Parent study.
The purpose of the first part of the study (subgroup R&D) is to demonstrate the safety and performance of the C-Scan system and to collect data in order to improve the analysis process. The purpose of the second part of the study (subgroup pre-pivotal) is to determine the ability of the C-Scan System to identify elevated risk subjects
The overall purpose of this two-part study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of iptacopan (LNP023) in addition to standard of care treatment.
ARGX-113-2009 is an operationally seamless 2-part, phase 2/3, prospective, global, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to investigate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, participant-reported outcome measures (including those assessing participant QoL), PK, and PD of efgartigimod PH20 SC administered via subcutaneous (SC) injection in adult participants with moderate to severe BP. This study intends to demonstrate that efgartigimod is an effective and safe treatment for BP, providing participants with control of disease activity (CDA) and eventually remission while reducing their cumulative exposure to OCS. study will consist of 2 parts: - Part A of the study is a phase 2 evaluation that intends to provide proof of concept for the therapeutic activity of efgartigimod PH20 SC in participants with BP. - Part B of the study is a phase 3 evaluation that intends to confirm the results obtained from part A in a separate, larger group of participants with BP. An interim analysis will be performed during part A (on data obtained through week 26 for all Part A participants) to assess the primary endpoint and several secondary endpoints, confirm the appropriate sample size for part B of the study, and determine whether the efficacy results observed through week 26 of part A warrant continued study of efgartigimod PH20 SC for the treatment of participants with BP (futility analysis). Other than differences in main goals, endpoints, and statistical analyses, parts A and B are identical in schedule, structure, assessments, and conduct.
This is a multi-center study to compare the efficacy and safety of itolizumab versus placebo as first-line therapy for subjects with Grade III-IV aGVHD or Grade II with LGI involvement, in combination with corticosteroids
This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of depemokimab compared with mepolizumab in adults with relapsing or refractory EGPA receiving SoC therapy.
Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is a helpful tool for evaluation of aerobic exercise capacity and tolerance for variety of population. CPET provides a full assessment of the physiologic responses of the pulmonary, cardiovascular, muscular, and cellular oxidative systems to exercise. The test progression include a incremental stepwise (on treadmill) or ramp control protocol (on bike ergometer ) to exhaustion. Measurement of respiratory gas exchange i.e. oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide, minute ventilation, other variables while monitoring ECG, blood pressure, pulse oximetry and exertion perceived (Borg Scale) during an incremental test . Aim: To compere exercise responses for maximal exercise testing with different population.
PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS Clinical Protocol ESR-20-20907 Study Title: Durvalumab (MEDI4736) plus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced large-cell neuroendocrine tumors of lung (LCNEC): a pilot phase II study Protocol Number: ESR-20-20907 Clinical Phase: phase II Study Duration: 30 months Investigational Product(s) and Reference Therapy: Investigational Product: Durvalumab (MEDI4736) Durvalumab concentrate for solution for infusion will be supplied in glass vials containing 500 mg durvalumab at a concentration of 50 mg/mL Reference Therapy: Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide Research Hypothesis Primary hypothesis: 1.1 In patients with advanced treatment naive LCNEC, treatment with Durvalumab+ Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide is associated with 12-month PFS rate of at least 18%. Secondary hypothesis: 1.2 In patients with advanced treatment naïve LCNEC, treatment with Durvalumab+ Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide is associated with ORR of 50%. 1.3 In patients with advanced treatment naïve LCNEC, treatment with Durvalumab+ Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide is associated with 12-months OS rate of at least 50%. 1.4 Incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events is less than 60%. Exploratory hypothesis: 1.5 There is a positive correlation between the small-cell lung cancer-like molecular subtype and efficacy parameters (ORR, PFS, OS), and also between high TMB and efficacy parameters (ORR, PFS, OS) of treatment with Durvalumab+Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide in patients with advanced treatment naive LCNEC. Objectives Primary Objective: 1.1 To assess progression-free survival (PFS at 12 months, RECIST v. 1.1) with Durvalumab+ Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide in patients with advanced treatment-naive LCNEC. Secondary Objectives: 1.2 To assess objective response rate (ORR at best response) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, v. 1.1 (RECIST v. 1.1) with Durvalumab+ Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide in patients with advanced treatment naive LCNEC. 1.3 To assess overall survival (OS at 12 months) with Durvalumab+ Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide in patients with advanced treatment-naive LCNEC. 1.4 To further evaluate the safety profile of Durvalumab+Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide in patients with advanced treatment naive LCNEC (CTCAE v. 5.0). Exploratory Objectives: 1.5 To assess the predictive effect of tumor molecular subtype (small-cell lung cancer - like versus non-small cell lung cancer - like, assessed by NGS), tumor mutational burden (TMB, mut/Mb assessed by NGS) and PD-L1 (assessed by TPS - by IHC using 22C3 antibody) on ORR, PFS, and OS with Durvalumab+Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide in patients with advanced treatment-naive LCNEC. Study Design: - Open-label non-randomized non-comparative single-center pilot phase 2 study - Response assessment: brain/chest/abdominal/pelvic CT scan every 8 weeks+-7 days - PFS, ORR - assessed by the board-certified radiology expert experienced in RECIST v. 1.1 evaluation; OS assessment Number of Centers: single center Number of Patients: 22 Study Population: Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically or cytologically documented advanced LCNEC (stage IV or stage III not eligible for definitive treatment) without prior systemic treatment for advanced disease. Investigational Product(s), Dose and Mode of Administration: The enrolled patients will receive IV durvalumab 1500 mg (administered on day 1 of each 21-day cycle), IV etoposide 100 mg/m² (administered on days 1-3 of each 21-day cycle), with investigator's choice of either IV carboplatin area under the curve 5 mg/mL per min or IV cisplatin 80 mg/m² (administered on day 1 of each 21-day cycle) for four cycles followed by maintenance IV durvalumab 1500 mg (administered on day 1 of each 28-day cycle).
Clinical study to investigate the efficacy and safety of savolitinib in combination with osimertinib versus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in participants with EGFR mutated, MET-overexpressed and/or amplified, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who have progressed on treatment with Osimertinib.
The purpose of this study is to learn more about the safety and efficacy of tirzepatide compared to placebo in children or teenagers with type 2 diabetes taking metformin, or basal insulin, or both. The overall study will last about 60 weeks with up to 14 clinic visits and 6 phone visits. Clinic visits will include blood sample collection, physical exam and questionnaire.