There are about 4372 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Greece. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This trial will try to establish the feasibility and efficacy of the combination of DaraVCD in Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients presenting with extramedullary disease (EMD). The study will be conducted as a Phase II trial. Forty patients will be included in the study cohort. All patients will be followed closely for toxicities and response assessment. After completion of treatment, patients will be followed every 6 months for survival until 5 years after enrolment
This open-label, randomized study for evaluating the efficacy and safety of single agent belantamab mafodotin when compared to pom/dex in participants with RRMM. Participants will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either single agent belantamab mafodotin or pom/dex. Belantamab mafodotin will be administered on Day 1 (D1) at every 3 weeks (Q3W) schedule. Pomalidomide will be administered daily on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle, with dexamethasone administered once weekly (Days 1, 8, 15, and 22). Participants in both arms will be treated until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, and lost to follow-up or end of study, whichever comes first.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of venetoclax in combination with azacitidine to improve Overall Survival (OS) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) participants compared to Best Supportive Care (BSC) when given as maintenance therapy following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). This study will have 2 parts: Part 1 (Dose Confirmation), which may include participants who are greater than or equal to 18 years old; Part 2 (Randomization) which may include participants who are greater than or equal to 12 years old. During Part 1, recommended Phase 3 dose of venetoclax in combination with azacitidine will be determined and during Part 2, the efficacy and safety of venetoclax with azacitidine (Part 2 Arm A) will be compared with BSC (Part 2 Arm B).
This study is being done to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) participants treated with venetoclax as routine standard of care in Greece. The decision to treat with venetoclax is made by the participant's physician prior to being offered enrollment in this study. The objectives of this study include determining overall response rate, assessing safety information, analyzing patient profiles and disease characteristics and participant quality of life.
Surgical management for osteoarthritis of the thumb is indicated when conservative measures have failed, and numerous techniques have been proposed. Distraction arthroplasty has been the gold standard due to lack of high quality evidence, which renders the benefits or harms of other techniques uncertain. The other treatment alternatives share at least partial excision of the trapezium, and include ligament reconstruction alone or with tendon interposition, allograft interposition arthroplasty, prosthetic implants and arthrodesis. A recent promising technique is the pillow technique, a type of interposition arthroplasty, which utilizes a fascia lata allograft as interposition material and stabilization with a K-wire. In view of the low quality evidence regarding the use of interposition material versus distraction arthroplasty alone, the investigators will compare the two methods in a prospective randomized study design. Hypothesis of the study is that interposition arthroplasty using the pillow technique yields better results in terms of functional improvement and grip strength when compared to the hematoma and distraction technique. The confirmation of the hypothesis is going to justify the use of the fascia lata in the procedure. On the contrary, if the pillow technique fails to yield clinically meaningful results, the recommendation of the hematoma and distraction technique will account for reducing the overall cost of the procedure, rendering the allograft redundant.
Primary Objectives: - Study is designed with two primary endpoints that will be analyzed on randomized participants at the time of the cut-off date for each given analysis (progression free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS]) - Study success is defined either on PFS or OS - The primary objective is to determine whether tusamitamab ravtansine improves the progression free survival (PFS) when compared to docetaxel in participants with metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) expressing CEACAM5 greater than or equal to 2+ in intensity in at least 50% of the tumor cell population and previously treated with standard-of-care platinum-based chemotherapy and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) - The primary objective is to determine whether tusamitamab ravtansine improves the overall survival (OS) when compared with docetaxel in participants with metastatic non-squamous NSCLC expressing CEACAM5 greater than or equal to 2+ in intensity in at least 50% of the tumor cell population and previously treated with standard-of-care platinum-based chemotherapy and an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Secondary Objectives: - To compare the objective response rate (ORR) of tusamitamab ravtansine with docetaxel - To compare the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of tusamitamab ravtansine with docetaxel - To evaluate the safety of tusamitamab ravtansine compared to docetaxel - To assess the duration of response (DOR) of tusamitamab ravtansine as compared with docetaxel
This study aims to compare the safety and the compliance to different procedures (A: at home or B: at the hospital) for introducing tree nuts into the diet of patients with Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergy to the aforementioned nuts. In parallel, the effectiveness of tree nuts' introduction in respect to tolerance induction compared to the standard care (strict avoidance of tree nuts) will be evaluated.
This is a multicenter, international open-label extension study of ATB200/AT2221 in adult subjects with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) who completed Study ATB200-03.
To evaluate the efficacy of eplontersen compared to placebo in participants with ATTR-CM receiving available standard of care (SoC). For more information, please visit https://www.cardio-ttransform.com.
This is a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group study designed to confirm the benefits of mepolizumab treatment on moderate or severe exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) participants given as an add on to their optimized maintenance COPD therapy. The maximum duration of participant participation is approximately 109 weeks, consisting of 2 screening visits (up to 3 weeks), a run-in period (up to 2 weeks), and an intervention period of at least 52 weeks and up to 104 weeks. 800 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive mepolizumab 100 milligrams (mg) or placebo every 4 weeks for at least 13 doses (52 weeks treatment period) up to a maximum of 26 doses (104 weeks treatment period). The number of randomized participants may increase up to approximately 1400.