There are about 36633 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in France. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This study aims analyze the transcriptome to identify predictive biomarkers of IVIG in CIDP patients. 25 patients with a diagnosis of CIDP according to European criteria, naïve of treatment, will be included and followed for 1 year. Clinical assessment (RT-MRC ; Martin vigorimeter, RT-mISS,R-ODS,TW25, 9hole-peg test) will be performed at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months after the first IVIG course. Responder/No responder status will be defined at 3 month and confirmed at 12 months. Blood samples will be collected before the IVIG course at baseline, and at 2months and 6 months. At the end of the first IVIG course a blood sample will be collected to assess early changes of transcriptome. The CIDP diagnosis and responder/no responder status will be confirmed by an independent committee. The transcriptome of the patients will be individually analyzed and compared regarding Responder/Non responder status to a control groups of 20 healthy subjects
Treatment of bone and joint infections remains difficult and variable according to centres and countries. Clindamycin given intravenously and followed by an oral route is recommended for the treatment of staphylococcal, streptococcal and anaerobes bone and joint infections by the French Society for Infectious Diseases. For staphylococcal bone and implant infections, rifampin is a major drug, as it remains active in bacterial biofilm and on quiescent staphylococci. For that reasons, clindamycin-rifampin combination therapy is frequently used in these infections.Clindamycin is metabolized by the P450 3A4 cytochrome, an enzyme strongly inducible by rifampin. A retrospective study published in 2010 on 70 patients treated for bone and joint infections showed that clindamycin serum concentrations were significantly lower when clindamycin was combined with rifampin (5.3 mg/liter vs 8.9 mg/liter; p<0.02). This drug interaction could even be stronger with the oral route, because of hepatic first-past effect, ending up with very low clindamycin serum concentration, a risk of selecting resistant microorganisms and treatment failure. This latter point is an important issue, because clindamycin has an excellent oral bioavailability and is frequently used in oral regimens. In the above study, a wide variability of clindamycin serum concentration was observed in the group of patients treated with combination therapy (1-12mg/l) suggesting interindividual variability. Rifampin induction of CYP 450 3A4/A5 depends on different receptor (PXR, RXR, LXRalpha) submitted to genetic polymorphism. Hypothesis: Plasma clearance of clindamycin (CLclin) combined with rifampicin (CLclinrif) is higher when clindamycin is administered by the oral route (CLclinrif OR) compared with IV administration (CLclinrif IV).
Irreversible pulpitis is an inflammatory condition of the dental pulp, highly painful, representing one of the main reasons for consulting dental emergency. The recommended emergency care is a partial endodontic treatment under local and/or locoregional anesthesia. The purpose of the emergency partial endodontic treatment is to stop the pain of pulpitis by removing a portion of the pulp. The final endodontic treatment is ideally performed 72 hours after. The literature reports major difficulty in obtaining adequate anesthesia in the mandible to perform partial endodontic treatment, especially for the mandibular molars. This results in a very painful care for the patient. The management of this type of emergency is costly in terms of equipment and time for health facilities. Patient comfort, cost saving and rationalization of the care time justify the search for an alternative to emergency partial endodontic treatment. In current practice, the short course oral corticotherapy is used in the management of oral pain from inflammatory origin. Glucocorticoids, thanks to their anti-inflammatory action, can neutralize the inflammatory mediators and thus pain. The pulp inflammation can be treated with this molecule: the effectiveness of intraosseous local steroid injection for irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molars has already been shown but results in local comorbidities and requires specific device. Oral administration of short-course prednisolone is simple and safe but its effectiveness to manage pain caused by irreversible pulpitis has not yet been demonstrated. Per-os administration of prednisolone has a very high (90%) and rapid (≤ 4 hours) bioavailability. No difference in effectiveness between intravenous and oral administration of this molecule was reported. This oral treatment could limit comorbidities and technical difficulties related to intraosseous injection and could delay the endodontic treatment to 72 hours in optimal conditions of anesthesia for the patient. Despite the difficulties described for the partial endodontic treatment, it is very effective in pain reduction and can reach 100% of success. Therefore a non-inferiority design was chosen to compare the effect of a short-course oral corticotherapy to a partial endodontic treatment for the reduction of pain at the emergency care of the irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars. The intervention arm will receive an oral dose of prednisolone (1 mg/kg) during the emergency visit followed-up by one morning dose by day during three days and the reference arm will have partial endodontic treatment. Both groups will have planned complete endodontic treatment 72 hours after enrolment.
The purpose of this open-label, single arm study is to further evaluate long-term tolerability, safety and efficacy outcomes of olesoxime in participants with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) who previously participated in one of the following two clinical studies: TRO19622 CL E Q 1115-1 (open-label Phase Ib, multicenter, single- and multiple- dose study) or TRO19622 CL E Q 1275-1 (NCT01302600, Phase II/III, adaptive, parallel-group, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, multinational study).
HIV infection can be efficiently controlled by antiretroviral therapy (ART), with in 2013 nearly 85 % of patients having a suppressed viremia, but HIV cannot, however, be eradicated with ART alone [1]. Overall, HIV has moved from a fatal to a chronic disease provided treatment is maintained life-long. Despite major improvement in antiretroviral drugs in terms of efficacy, tolerability and simplicity, life-long therapy is still associated with drug toxicity. Several drugs or drug classes, which have historically saved lives since 1996 and are currently widely used such as protease inhibitors and nucleosides analogues, are associated with long-term toxicities and increased incidence of comorbidities. Currently, worldwide there is an approximated 10 millions of HIV infected patients under cART. This number should increase in the next years, as most recent guidelines recommend earlier therapy given the benefits in terms of disease progression and prevention of transmission. Because of the increasing number of patients who will be under cART in the future, the cumulative ART toxicity, the difficulties to access ART in some areas of the world, the fatigue expressed by patients about ART and the cost issues, there is an urgent need to search for HIV CURE. To date, only two cases of sterilizing HIV cure were reported so far: the famous "Berlin Patient" after two homozygous Delta32-CCR5 bone-marrow grafts for an acute leukemia [2], and the Mississipi baby after very early initiation of cART 31 hours after delivery [3]. However those cases of sterilizing HIV cure remain exceptional and the alternative objective of a functional HIV cure appears to be more realistic, though still described in rare groups of patients like Elite controllers (EC) and post treatment controllers (PTC) patients. In addition new and complex therapeutic strategies are currently proposed to try purging the HIV reservoirs, but none of them proved so far able to reach this goal. Therefore the objective of finding a Cure to HIV [4] requires first to better understand the basic mechanisms of the persistence of HIV reservoirs in the population of chronically-infected fully-suppressed HIV+ patients in order to define future therapeutic strategies.
This is a Phase 3, open-label, randomized, controlled, multi-national, multi-center, parallel-arm study comparing tivozanib to sorafenib in participants with refractory advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Participants will be randomized (1:1) to treatment with tivozanib or sorafenib. Participants will be stratified by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk category (favorable; intermediate; poor) and prior therapy (two prior vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR TKI); a prior checkpoint inhibitor [programmed cell death -1 protein (PD-1) or PD-1 ligand (PD1-L) inhibitor] plus a prior VEGFR TKI; a prior VEGFR TKI plus any other systemic agent). All participants will be evaluated for progression free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, and the duration of response as well as safety and tolerability. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses are also included in study.
The study will be conducted in crossover trial, with two 72-hour hospitalization separated by a period Wash-out of at least one week. Each hospitalization is a period of treatment. According to randomization, patients will be provided with either Diabeloop system or the usual system. In both treatment periods: - patients in a situation of sedentarity or physical activity, will be equipped with ActiGraph (measuring motricity) and a ActiHeart ( measuring heart rate) - meals and physical activities will be similar in both periods - the same blood glucose meter will be used throughout the duration of the study. - the capillary blood glucose will be performed : before bolus and 2 hours after a meal, before exercise, in case of hypo or hyper-glycemic episodes and when the patient and / or investigator deem it necessary.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate treatment retention in psoriatic arthritis participants with STELARA or tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor (TNFi) therapies in relation to effectiveness, safety, benefit/risk and to examine clinical response.
Islet transplantation for type 1 diabetes results are still improving, and actually Insulin-independence with normal HbA1c is obtained in 50% of patients after 5 years, 80% of c-peptide positive patients. In addition to the need of 2 or 3 surgical or radiological interventions to inject islets, an immunosuppressive regimen is needed, which can be deleterious, particularly on kidneys. Moreover, long term beneficial effects of islet transplantation on stabilization or prevention of macro and micro vascular complications of diabetes has not been evaluated. In a preliminary work, it was observed a stabilisation or improvement of microvascular complications when compared to pre-transplant data. The aim of this study is to compare the evolution of diabetes complications, especially nephrologic, 10 years after islet transplantation and to compare it to patients with a brittle diabetes, 10 years after evaluation for islet transplantation, finally not performed. This case-control study will evaluate nephrologic parameters (creatinine, MDRD creatinine clearance, microalbuminuria, proteinuria) and other micro and macro-vascular complications of type 1 diabetes) before islet transplantation and 10 years after the transplantation or after the first evaluation in patients who finally did not underwent islet transplantation for various non nephrologic reasons
The investigators prospectively enrolled 64 early PD patients (less than 3 years after the first symptom) in order to prospectively assess the natural history of non-dopaminergic symptoms.