There are about 36633 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in France. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This is an international, prospective study to assess the impact of concomitant early use of liquid biopsy (FoundationOne® Liquid CDx) within the diagnostic pathway, compared with the standard of care diagnostic pathway, on the timing of routine cancer care in treatment-naïve participants presenting with a clinical diagnosis of advanced cancer, where the pathologic diagnosis has not yet been confirmed. Participants with one of the following two clinical presentations will be included: participants with evidence of de novo metastatic lung cancer or participants with evidence of de novo metastatic gastrointestinal cancer. Participants may have undergone different levels of diagnostic workup prior to enrollment. Participants who have not had tissue biopsy performed prior to enrollment will be classified as 'basic workup' and those who have had tissue biopsy performed prior to enrollment will be classified as 'extended workup'. During the diagnosis period, eligible participants will undergo liquid biopsy (FoundationOne® Liquid CDx assay; as per label) on blood samples. Blood samples will be tested using the FoundationOne® Liquid CDx assay at a central laboratory. In parallel, participants will undergo the standard of care diagnostic pathway, including tissue biopsy and histology workup, if not already done before enrollment, and molecular workup according to ESMO guidelines or national guidelines for each tumor type included in this study. Once a complete pathologic diagnosis has been made, the investigator (or multidisciplinary team) can complete an anti-cancer treatment recommendation assessment. Anti-cancer treatment recommendation should follow current practice and professional guidelines based on the results provided by either liquid biopsy (as per label) or tissue biopsy/standard of care.
This study is open to adults aged 18 years and older with bronchiectasis. People can join the study if they were previously enrolled in another study with BI 1291583 (1397-0012: Airleafᵀᴹ). The purpose of this study is to find out whether a medicine called BI 1291583 helps people with bronchiectasis, an inflammatory lung condition. The investigators also want to know how well people with this condition can tolerate BI 1291583 in the long term. Participants take a low, medium, or high dose of BI 1291583 as a tablet once a day for up to 1 year. Participants who were taking placebo in the Airleafᵀᴹ study are put into the BI 1291583 dosage groups randomly, which means by chance. Placebo tablets look like BI 1291583 but do not contain any medicine. Participants who were taking BI 1291583 in the Airleafᵀᴹ study continue to take the same dose. Participants visit the study site 9 times and get 4 phone calls from the site staff. During the visits, the doctors collect information on any health problems of the participants. The doctors also check whether BI 1291583 helps reduce the symptoms of bronchiectasis.
Numerous studies have shown that the extra-cranial application of near infrared light (λ=600-1000nm) (also called transcranial photobiomodulation or tPBM), has a positive impact on brain function in both humans and experimental animal models and a neuroprotective effect in animal models. Several of these studies have reported that tPBM could impart more beneficial effects in aged or diseased brains. The primary objective of this study is to use fMRI to compare the cerebral activations in response to a finger tapping motor task, before and after 24min of tPBM versus sham stimulation, in old and young healthy human subjects. The hypothesis of the investigators is that tPBM improves brain function in participants who will be treated using the active device in comparison with those treated with the sham device and that this effect should will be more pronounced in the older subjects.
ERASE PH-COPD is a randomized double-blind study, with 2 parallel groups. Patients with severe pulmonary hypertension due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, will be randomly assigned to receive Tadalafil orally or placebo.
Clinical presentation of patients after severe injury such as a severe infection, trauma or extensive burns is characterized by the simultaneous occurrence of dysregulation of the initial inflammatory response and immunosuppression associating quantitative and functional alterations of innate and adaptive immune cells. These acquired immune dysfunctions have been associated with an increased susceptibility to nosocomial infections, foremost among which are ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Despite the implementation of a set of preventive measures, the incidence of these VAP remains high in intensive care, with rates in Europe of 1.5% per day of ventilation. Post-aggressive immunosuppression is characterized by the decrease in the expression of HLA-DR (belonging to the type II major histocompatibility complex, MHC-II) on the surface of monocytes (mHLA-DR). The administration of interferon gamma (IFNγ) can restore the level of mHLA-DR and may possibly improve the prognosis as an adjuvant therapy associated to antibiotics. However, the level of proof of this therapeutic strategy is low, limited to small cohorts of patients, or clinical studies without prior immunodepression assessment. The objective of this study is to conduct a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled superiority trial to assess the effect of IFNγ administration on the duration of mechanical ventilation following the first episode of VAP in patients having an HLA-DR < 8000 AB/C All reported data about recombinant human IFNγ 1b for the control of secondary infections in patients with septic shock used the dose of 100 micrograms per day by subcutaneous route for 3 to 5 days . At this dose, no retrospective study has reported any serious adverse effects and recombinant human IFNγ 1b allows an increase in monocyte membrane expression of mHLA-DR.
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an immune-mediated disease associated with inflammation of multiple organ systems. This study will assess how safe and effective upadacitinib is in treating adult participants with moderately to severely active SLE. Adverse events and change in the disease activity will be assessed. Upadacitinib is an approved drug for rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondylarthritis and is being developed for the treatment of SLE. This study is "double-blinded", which means that neither the trial participants nor the study doctors will know who will be given upadacitinib and who will be given placebo (does not contain treatment drug) . This study comprised of 3 sub studies. In Study 1 and Study 2, study doctors put the participants in 1 of the 2 groups, called treatment arms. Each group receives a different treatment. There is a 1 in 2 chance that participants will be assigned to placebo. Eligible participants from Study 1 and Study 2 will enter Study 3 at week 52 to receive specific doses of upadacitinib based on their disease activity and their original treatment assignment in Study 1 or 2. Approximately 500 participants diagnosed with SLE will be enrolled in each of the Study 1 and Study 2 in approximately 320 sites across the world. Participants will receive oral tablets of upadacitinib or matching placebo once daily for 52 weeks in Study 1 and Study 2. Eligible participants from Study 1 and Study 2 will receive oral tablets of upadacitinib once daily for 52 weeks in Study 3. There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or clinic. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.
This study aims to define individual profiles of treatment resistants in order to find indicators and predictors of the therapeutic response.
Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) have long been linked to mental health problems in adulthood. In the case of cancer, no study has considered that such an anteriority could make patients more vulnerable emotionally, even though the presence of reactionary disorders such as stress, anxiety or depression are characteristic of such a pathology. Activated during periods of stress and therefore during the illness, even the attachment system is mobilized and must be considered to allow more understanding of the illness experience. The attachment style can be seen here as an individual dimension that plays a role in the emotional regulation and resilience of patients. It is also particularly solicited during the remission phase, a complex and singular period of cancer disease that confronts patients with an ambivalence of hope and fear. The fear of recurrence is a concern that the cancer may return or progress in the same organ or in another part of the body. This is a determining factor in the occurrence of anxiety-depressive disorders. Finally, several studies have shown a strong association between depression/anxiety and Cancer-Related Fatigue (CRF) after treatment, especially during the remission phase. ACEs leave physiological and epigenetic impact that can nowadays be easily evaluated, thus providing additional evidence between adversity, physiological and epigenetic vulnerability and the ability to adapt to life's challenges such as cancer. Life history changes are mediated by changes in cellular mechanisms affecting genome expression. It is currently widely demonstrated that ACEs increases epigenetic modifications. The interest of this project is therefore to highlight the psychological consequences related to the occurrence of cancer in the developmental history (in terms of adversities) of patients who have completed adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, taking into account the patients' previous attachments, resilience, fear of recurrence and perceived fatigue in order to consider their interactions and their effects on their psychological health and ultimately on their quality of life.
This research promoted by the AP-HP (DRCI) is financed by the Agence de la biomédecine (ABM) and the Fondation Maladie Rare (FMR) and received a favourable opinion from the CPP on 8/12/2020. It aims to describe the decision-making process of couples faced with the discovery of an isolated corpus callosum anomaly in their fetus during pregnancy. Indeed, the anomaly of the corpus callosum in antenatal represents a paradigmatic situation of the clinic of uncertainty for couples and teams, because the prognosis is variable, in 80% of the cases it is favourable and in 20% it is associated with an intellectual deficiency. This study will use a mixed methodology, combining quantitative data (STAI A and B anxiety scale, BDI-II depression scale, PCL-5 post-traumatic stress scale, DAS-16 marital relationship dynamics scale, experimental emotional self-evaluation scales adapted to each member of the couple, R/S scale) and qualitative data (through a research interview of the couple conducted by a research psychologist). In the course of the study, 50 couples will be interviewed between 3 months and 5 years after the pregnancy (post-medical termination of pregnancy and post-delivery), with 25 couples who will have continued the pregnancy and 25 couples who will have terminated the pregnancy. Statistical and qualitative analysis of the data using NVivo software will be performed. The aim is to better understand the factors that lead couples to decide to continue or terminate a pregnancy in a situation of extreme prognostic uncertainty, their experience of their decision and to improve the care pathway currently offered to these couples faced with this type of situation.
Anorexia nervosa is characterized by intestinal dysbiosis, related to the feeding behavior impairment presented by these patients. Pathophysiologic hypotheses are involving the trouble of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in the field of mental diseases.