There are about 9403 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Switzerland. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This is a two-arm randomized controlled trial with the aim to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of post-operative management after a modified Lapidus arthrodesis with/without an Akin or a Weil/Hohmann surgery fusion with immediate complete weight-bearing compared with partial weight-bearing (10 - 15kg) for 6 weeks as a novel approach for rehabilitation after a foot surgery.
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Currently, Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoon is the most frequently used single shot technology and hence is the benchmark for upcoming technologies. A novel method, pulse-field ablation (PFA) using the FARAPULSE catheter, has recently been introduced (FARAPULSE PFA, Boston Scientific). However, whether FARAPULSE PFA provides effectiveness similar to the standard-of-practice Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoon is yet to be investigated. Given that FARAPULSE PFA has shown in studies not to cause any of the severe complications reported in association with traditional PVI while being highly effective, it might be even safer and more effective for use in AF ablation procedures. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of PVI using FARAPULSE PFA (Boston Scientific) and the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label trial with blinded endpoint adjudication. Given that the Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoon is the standard-of-practice for PVI and the FARAPULSE PFA is the novel technology, this trial has a non-inferiority design. The null hypothesis with regards to the primary efficacy endpoint is that the FARAPULSE PFA (Boston Scientific) shows lower efficacy compared to the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) and that therefore more episodes of first recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia between days 91 and 365 will be observed in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. Hence, the alternative hypothesis postulates that the FARAPULSE PFA is non-inferior to the Arctic Front Cryoballoon. Rejection of the null hypothesis is needed to conclude non-inferiority.
The aim of the SUISSE MPC 2 study is to treat stress urinary incontinence in adult women.
This retrospective collaborative study on persistent exercise intolerance after COVID-19 offers to perform a large descriptive analysis of CPET performed in real-life by pulmonologists, cardiologists and physiologists. Indeed, these practicians are regularly consulted for a persistent intolerance to exercise expressed by dyspnea and/or frank fatigability sometimes associated with muscular or thoracic pain. When these complaints persist beyond 3 months after the first symptoms, it is legitimate to perform a CPET: - Either to evaluate the functional impact of an identified organ deficiency (e.g. myocarditis, pulmonary fibrosis, etc.), - Or, in the absence of formal arguments for an identified organ deficiency, to observe possible abnormalities in physiological responses during an incremental exercise test, likely to explain the persistence of symptoms and intolerance to exercise. Indeed, the recent literature highlights the presence of non-specific ventilatory and cardio-circulatory abnormalities leading to various physio-pathological observations. Unfortunately, these reports now concern relatively small numbers of patients with very diverse clinical forms of Covid, comorbidities and habitus. In order to improve the understanding of persistent symptoms and in particular the diversity of physiological response presentations, the investigators propose to collect a very large amount of data through a web-based platform designed to collect the measurements made throughout the exercise test directly from the ergospirometer. The relevant data covers the period from January 2, 2020 to December 31, 2022 (i.e. 35 months), The retrospective data collection will be carried out from February 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023. The descriptive analysis will focus on the kinetics of all the variables measured and calculated on subgroups defined a priori on age, sex, comorbidities, acute covid severity, persistent symptoms post covid, regular habitual physical activity level, etc. according to the sample. The study is expected to collect data from around 1000 patients and to involve around 40 French-speaking investigators. However, this collaborative study is open on request to all centers wishing to participate, as the web platform has been developed for data collection in English.
The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate the efficacy of BIIB059 (litifilimab) compared with placebo in reducing skin disease activity measured by the Cutaneous Lupus Activity of Physician's Global Assessment-Revised (CLA-IGA-R) score [Parts A and B (US)] and the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CLASI-A) score [Part B (ROW)] in participants with active SCLE and/or CCLE with or without systemic manifestations and refractory and/or intolerant to antimalarials. The secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate the efficacy of BIIB059 in reducing SCLE and/or CCLE disease activity by CLA-IGA-R, CLASI-A; to evaluate additional efficacy parameters of BIIB059 in reducing SCLE and/or CCLE disease activity; safety; tolerability; and immunogenicity of BIIB059 [Parts A and B].
The aim of this study project is to clarify whether defined practical application skills are learned by anesthesiology specialists through a self-directed learning program with learning videos and a hands-on exercise station ("intervention group"). "Control group" is a traditional instructor-led practical workshop classroom teaching. Hypothesis: A video-based and self-directed learning program shows no difference in the learning successes than traditional face-to-face workshops.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) throughout and beyond treatment duration. These IrAEs can be varied and difficult to predict, as they can involve almost any organ, regardless of where the primary tumor is located. Treatment modality and individual characteristics appear to influence the frequency and severity of these events, which can become serious without proper monitoring and timely intervention. Generally, patient visits are scheduled at the same intervals in which patients receive treatment, once every two to four weeks. In these large intervals, patients can be surprised by IrAEs without a close schedule visit to their oncology physician. Not only this may negatively influence their overall well-being, their perceived self-efficacy to manage their own condition and their health-related quality of life may be affected as well. Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to monitor patient symptoms has become incredibly valuable in describing treatment toxicity, including that of ICIs. PROs are a self-report of the patient's own perceptions of their health status. Using their own words, or by replying to questionnaires, patients can convey symptoms and how these affect their daily life and quality of life. Questionnaires are an example of a PRO measure (PROM), which have increasingly been provided electronically (resulting in electronic PROs or ePROs). The ubiquity of connected electronic devices has enabled long-distance monitoring of symptoms through electronic questionnaires. In patients treated with chemotherapy, studies have shown that using this method to collect symptom data can enable healthcare providers to help patients manage their symptoms remotely. This allows patients to receive timely support from home, that could help prevent serious complications that could entail visits to the emergency department, unscheduled hospitalizations and treatment interruptions. The IePRO study's aim is to test a model of care that uses electronic questionnaires to monitor symptoms that could be related to the use of ICIs. Patients would reply to these questionnaires at least once a week using an electronic web application (on their phone or computer). A team of oncology nurses reviews their replies and calls patients when new symptoms appear or when they worsen. Using a standard triage algorithm, the nurses guide patients on how to proceed: if they should stay home and follow self-care advice, if they should have a second call within the next 24 hours to follow-up on their symptoms, or if they should come to the hospital for an in-person assessment as soon as possible. In this study, it is hypothesized that this model of care could lead to an earlier detection of IrAEs, as well as their improved management by reducing the number of high-severity IrAEs, the number of unscheduled emergency admissions and hospitalizations, as well as decreasing the number of treatment interruptions and of immunosuppressive treatments used to treat IrAEs.
This study is an open-label, 2-part, Phase 2, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profiles of botensilimab as monotherapy and in combination with balstilimab in participants with advanced cutaneous melanoma refractory to checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
The Micra MC1VR01 or Micra AVMC1AVR1 Transcatheter Pacing System (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) has become a major breakthrough as an alternative to standard transvenous pacemakers. The aim of this multi-center study is to assess the clinical outcomes of patients implanted with Micra LLPM in real life, in different clinical scenarios.
The primary aim of the SwissNeuroFoundation AneurysmDataBase Project is to implement information technology based tools to create and use a holistic reference database specific to intracranial aneurysms (IA). The SwissNeuroFoundation AneurysmDataBase are concerned with generating the data with which to populate this database. The purpose for populating the database are to: - Screen for and evaluate markers of risk for intracranial aneurysm formation and aneurysm rupture. Are considered as markers the following: genetics factors, microbiota, environmental factors, congenital factors (ie: cerebrovascular anatomical variants), transcriptomics signature, proteomics signature,shape characteristics, haemodynamics characteristics. - Screen for and evaluate prognostic factors of outcome regarding different management strategies including watchful observation, microsurgical treatment, endovascular treatment or any combination thereof. - Implement and evaluate patient-specific management protocols integrating all available information. - Evaluate the impact of the database and use of tools to improve care, reduce costs, support knowledge discovery and promote new industrial developments.