There are about 9403 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Switzerland. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The SYNTAX III Revolution trial is a randomized diagnostic research study that investigates the use of CT scan and angiogram of the heart to help doctors decide which method is the best to improve blood supply to the heart in patients with complex coronary artery disease. Each patient will undergo an angiogram and CT scan per standard of care. The randomization strategy in this study is not between patients but between two teams of doctors, the so-called "Heart Teams", will be randomized: in the first round, team 1 assesses the angiogram, and team 2 assesses the CT scan. Then they make a decision about which treatment would be the best to treat complex coronary artery disease. In the second round, both teams see the imaging method that they did not see in the first round, and make the decision again. The final decision on the clinical treatment strategy is at the sole discretion of the Heart Team and there are no criteria described in SYNTAXIII Revolution protocol leading influencing this final decision. Hypothesis: Determination of the best treatment strategy for coronary artery disease based on a CT scan will result in similar decisions as based on invasive coronary angiography.
The primary purpose of the study is to demonstrate that lenvatinib in combination with everolimus (Arm A) or pembrolizumab (Arm B) is superior compared to sunitinib alone (Arm C) in improving progression-free survival (PFS) (by independent imaging review [IIR] using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST 1.1]) as first-line treatment in participants with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Comparison of OCTA to conventional imaging modalities for the diagnosis of eye diseases
Several studies have demonstrated the possibility of outpatient management or early discharge for certain patients presenting acute pulmonary embolism (PE), providing a suitable structure is in place. The approach featured in the most recent guidelines on acute PE of the European Society of Cardiology, refers to an all-cause mortality risk assessment using the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score or the simplified PESI score (sPESI). The sPESI takes into account demographics (age), patient history (cancer, cardiac or respiratory disease), and clinical data (systolic blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation). Outpatient care is offered to low-risk patients, providing that all the conditions pertaining to start anticoagulant treatment and follow-up at home are met. An alternative approach based on a list of simple criteria has been developed as the one used in HESTIA study. The main criteria included in the HESTIA rule consist of absence of the following: hemodynamic instability, need for oxygen therapy, high-risk of hemorrhage, renal or liver failure, or other medical or social conditions requiring hospitalization. The investigators hereby propose comparing these two approaches in an open-label, controlled randomized international trial with blinded adjudication of endpoints. The main objective is to demonstrate, in normotensive PE patients, that a strategy based on the HESTIA rule compared to a strategy based on the simplified PESI score is at least as safe as regards the 30-day-rate of adverse events (recurrent VTE, major bleeding or death). The major secondary objectives are to demonstrate, in normotensive PE patients, that a strategy based on the HESTIA rule compared to a strategy based on the simplified PESI score is more effective : - As regards the rate of patients eventually managed as outpatients. - As regards the rate of patients, in theory, eligible for outpatient care,
The investigators test the hypothesis that oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiberoptic position differ between the size 2 LM Ambu AuraOnce and the LM Ambu AuraGain in non-paralyzed anaesthetized pediatric patients.
To answer the question whether a previously detected breath profile in patients suffering from obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) can be found in a cohort of patients with suspected OSA using mass spectrometry (validation study).
The GASPAR trial is a pragmatic, parallel-arms, single-center, non-blinded, superiority randomized control trial in neurorehabilitation. The main objective is to test whether a 4 weeks gait rehabilitation program that uses augmented reality is superior to a conventional treadmill training program of equivalent intensity. Baseline assessments precede allocation, which consists in blocking randomization (2:1 ratio) with stratification according to the disease etiology. Post-intervention assessments serve to compare the short-term efficacy of the intervention between the two groups. Three months after discharge, follow-up assessments take place to detect potential long-term effects.
The purpose of this study of MCS110 with PDR001 was to characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and antitumor activity of the combination of MCS110 with PDR001 in adult patients with solid tumors.
Oral complications during and after cancer treatment are common. A key role in maintaining oral health plays saliva. In the last decade numerous studies have investigated immunological biomarkers such as cytokines in saliva samples. In children, the few studies have investigated salivary cytokines (sCK) suggesting that these are associated with oral health (sCK). One study investigating sCK in adult oncology patients showed an association between Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and severity of oral chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in survivors of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Therefore determination of sCK concentrations may also be helpful for assessment of GVHD activity and other inflammatory processes in cancer patients. In pediatric oncology patients, to the investigators' knowledge, no study has so far investigated sCK concentrations as markers for oral or systemic health.
In this randomized study, the investigators aim to test the hypothesis that the reinstitution of a normal circadian rhythm by continuous infusions of dexmedetomidine compared to propofol between 8pm and 6am after diagnosis of hyperactive or mixed delirium, decreases the duration of delirium. The infusions might have to be repeated several times to achieve resolution of delirium.