There are about 28871 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Canada. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this open-label study is to investigate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a continuous regimen of efgartigimod compared with a cyclic regimen in participants with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis (gMG). Study details include: The study duration will be up to 138 weeks (including screening and a safety follow-up of up to 9 weeks) - Part A (regimen comparison period) - 21 weeks - Part B (extension period) - up to 105 weeks The visit frequency, including virtual visits, will be weekly through Week 21 and every 5 weeks for the remainder of the study.
This Phase 1, first-in-human (FIH), clinical study of CC-92328 will explore the safety, tolerability and preliminary biological and clinical activity of CC-92328 as a single-agent in the setting of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM). The study will be conducted in two parts: monotherapy dose escalation (Part A) and monotherapy dose expansion (Part B).
The goals of this clinical study are to learn more about the study drugs, semaglutide (SEMA) with the fixed-dose combination (FDC) of cilofexor/firsocostat (CILO/FIR), and understand whether they cause fibrosis improvement and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) resolution in participants with cirrhosis due to NASH.
The study is designed to compare the efficacy of asciminib 80 mg QD versus Investigator selected TKI for the treatment of newly diagnosed, previously untreated patients with Ph+ CML-CP. The Investigator selected TKI will be one of the following treatment options for first-line treatment of CML-CP - imatinib 400 mg QD or nilotinib 300 mg BID or dasatinib 100 mg QD or bosutinib 400 mg QD.
This Phase 3, randomized, Double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-arm, parallel-group, multicenter study with randomized withdrawal will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and durability of KBP-5074 in adult participants who have stage 3b/4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration [CKD-EPI] formula [eGFR {EPI}] ≥15 to ≤44 mL/min/1.73 m^2) and uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 and <180 mm Hg and taking 2 or more antihypertensive medications.
Knee replacements are the second most common surgery in Canada. Most patients recover very well but research consistently shows that 1 in 5 patients still have pain many months after surgery. Doctors often prescribe opioid medications for pain after surgery (e.g. Percocet, hydromorphone, codeine). These medications can be helpful for some people, but they can also be dangerous, particularly when used for a long time. Many patients don't like the way opioids make them feel and would prefer alternative pain management strategies. Some people become addicted to opioids, have a difficult time reducing the dose of opioids, or have lasting health problems after using them. People in this study will be randomized to either have usual care or a new pathway designed to improve pain control and decrease opioid use after knee replacements. This study will have an intervention coordinator who will assess patients before surgery and who will follow up with patients regularly after surgery to make sure their pain is controlled and to avoid long-term opioid use. This study will use education, physiotherapy, psychological therapy, ice/cold, and non-opioid pain medications. As pain medications may work differently in different patients, the coordinator will check on each patient to look for pain control and assist to reduce the amount of opioids used after surgery. This study will help people have safer and more effective pain management after surgery which may lead to better recovery, higher satisfaction, and a lower risk of being harmed by opioids after surgery.
The study will focus on cardiac blood and imaging biomarkers to facilitate early recognition of patients at risk for myocardial injury after COVID-19 vaccination. Ultimately, the intention is to identify patients at risk, reduce adverse events, and determine the need for longer-term follow-up in patients with myocardial injury after vaccination.
Interferon (IFN) lambda is one of the fundamental responses of the innate immune system. Peginterferon lambda is a long-acting form that has been studied extensively in human trials in viral hepatitis, confirming it safety and tolerability. It is particularly attractive for consideration in the use of acute respiratory illness due to the high expression of the lambda receptor in lung epithelia. We propose to evaluate peginterferon-lambda in ambulatory patients with mild to moderate COVID-19.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) affects the airways that causes shortness of breath, cough. COPD gets worse over time, and often leads to emergency department visits, hospital visits, frequent doctor appointments and medications. This means COPD is expensive, and severely impacts patient quality of life. Unfortunately, patients are often not properly diagnosed until their disease is fairly advanced. We know a lot about the health care use of people with COPD once they have been diagnosed, but we do not know much about what happens to them leading up to their diagnosis. Through this project we want to better understand the time period prior to COPD diagnosis, so that we can learn more about what happens to people before they are diagnosed. This project will use health data to find out if we can identify trends in health care use by individuals newly diagnosed with COPD. We will identify people that have COPD based on health records, and look back to find out about their health care use prior to their diagnosis. We will look at data related to doctors' visits, emergency department visits, hospital stays and medications. We want to use these markers to better understand what happens to people before they are diagnosed, and to find out if we can identify risk factors for a COPD diagnosis. We hope by doing this research we can better identify people at risk for COPD and ensure that they receive treatment early, which may improve their health outcomes.
INTRODUCTION Psychological distress and reduced quality of life are prevalent within the heart failure (HF) population. The 1-year rehospitalization (40%) and 5-year mortality (45% for women and 60% for men) rates are high. International task force committees report that medical therapy combined with counselling for HF self-care optimizes clinical outcomes. HYPOTHESES At trial completion (median = 8.5 months, range = 2 to 15 months), ODYSSEE-vCHAT versus enhanced usual care (eUC) is predicted to reduce morbidity and mortality rates. Greater engagement with the digital program is also predicted to be linked with improved self-reported mental and physical health at months 4, 8, and 12 and trial completion. RECRUITMENT HF patients who are at least 18 years old were recruited from the University Health Network (UHN), Sunnybrook Hospital, Mount Sinai Hospital, and the community. Accrual of the sample (N = 61) occurred over 13 months. DESIGN ODYSSEE-vCHAT is a double-arm, parallel-group, randomized, controlled (real-world) pilot trial with assessments at baseline, months 4, 8, and 12, and trial completion (median = 8.5 months, range = 2 to 15 months). It is a single-blind trial, with research personnel blinded (excluding the research coordinator). All patients were provided with free access to their respective digital intervention, ODYSSEE-vCHAT or eUC. Subjects were invited by weekly emails to participate in the resources available to their group. eUC patients were provided with access to educational materials for HF self-care that are available to the public on professional heart health websites. Participation in supplementary programs that provide HF self-care education was not restricted, rather it was monitored by self-report during assessments and will be statistically controlled for during outcome assessments. ANALYSIS Separate generalized linear models (GLMs) will evaluate ODYSSEE-vCHAT versus eUC for primary and secondary outcomes. GLMs will be adjusted for baseline assessments and potential covariates. Interactions between treatment arm and gender will be examined for each outcome, using Bonferroni post-hoc comparisons for relevant subgroups. Significance in all tests will be p < 0.05, 2-sided.