There are about 28871 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Canada. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The primary objective of the study is to determine the efficacy of REGN1908-1909, as compared to placebo, to reduce allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis symptoms and allergy rescue medication use during natural cat exposure. The Secondary Objectives are: - To assess the reduction of allergic symptoms and use of allergy rescue medications after treatment with REGN1908-1909 versus placebo, as measured by the individual components of the CSMS - To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as measured by the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ[S]) - To determine the efficacy of REGN1908-1909, as compared to placebo, to inhibit a wheal-and-flare response to a skin prick test with cat allergen - To assess the durability of effect in allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis symptom and medication scores after multiple doses of REGN1908-1909 compared to placebo given every 12 weeks (Q12W) - To determine the efficacy following multiple doses of REGN1908-1909 compared to placebo at inhibiting a wheal-and-flare response to a skin prick test with cat allergen - To estimate the effect of REGN1908-1909 on lung function, as compared to placebo, in patients with asthma - To determine the efficacy of REGN1908-1909 as compared to placebo to reduce asthma symptoms in patients with asthma - To assess whether there is a difference in asthma rescue medication use in patients with asthma who are treated with REGN1908-1909 compared to placebo - To assess whether there is a difference in nighttime awakenings in patients with asthma treated with REGN1908-1909 compared to placebo - To evaluate the short-term and long-term safety and tolerability of REGN1908-1909, including the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions, local injection site reactions, and asthma exacerbations - To determine systemic exposure of total (free and antigen-bound) antibodies as measured by concentration of REGN1908 and REGN1909 - To assess the immunogenicity of REGN1908 and REGN1909
Muscle and strength begin to noticeably decline around 50 years of age, increasing an individual's risk for disease and disability. Although changes in muscle mass ultimately depend on the balance of muscle protein synthesis (MPS) and breakdown (MPB) of muscle proteins, the latter remains relatively constant with aging. Accordingly, interventions that increase rates of MPS may combat long-term decrements in skeletal muscle mass and function. Previous research has established that an optimal diet to maintain muscle mass in elderly individuals requires relatively large amounts of high-quality protein to be consumed at each meal of the day. While this is a seemingly simple strategy, there are some barriers to increasing protein feeding in elderly individuals, particularly the cost of high-quality protein and, sometimes, difficulty with chewing/swallowing. Moreover, older adults often do not wish to consume large portions of protein in one meal. Milk is a readily accessible, affordable and nutritious source of nutrient-dense high-quality protein. Consuming milk with each meal is an easy strategy to promote the maintenance of skeletal muscle mass with aging. There is also evidence suggesting that a higher fat content of milk can have a beneficial role in stimulating the MPS response to feeding, but there are insufficient data to recommend this strategy to elderly individuals. The primary aim is to measure the rates of MPS in response to controlled diets providing whole milk, fat-free milk, or a control supplement (almond beverage - often marketed as an 'alternative' to milk) with each meal. All diets will provide equal amounts of energy, but the dairy interventions will provide more protein, reflecting the amount of protein provided by each beverage. The investigators hypothesize that rates of MPS will be highest in the whole milk group but that fat-free milk will still elicit a greater MPS than almond beverage. The investigators will conduct the comparison of beverages under habitual physical activity levels and under a brief period of increased physical activity (i.e., increased daily steps). Thus, the investigators will be able to determine whether MPS responses to the experimental beverages are increased in combination with physical activity. The results will provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of daily milk ingestion for the maintenance of muscle in the elderly, increasing the marketability of milk, and potentially whole milk.
The purpose of this open-label study is to investigate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a continuous regimen of efgartigimod compared with a cyclic regimen in participants with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis (gMG). Study details include: The study duration will be up to 138 weeks (including screening and a safety follow-up of up to 9 weeks) - Part A (regimen comparison period) - 21 weeks - Part B (extension period) - up to 105 weeks The visit frequency, including virtual visits, will be weekly through Week 21 and every 5 weeks for the remainder of the study.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity and immune response of a single intramuscular dose of the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) maternal vaccine compared to placebo, when administered in the second or third trimester of pregnancy in women, 15 to 49 years of age (YOA), with high risk pregnancies and in the infants born to the vaccinated mothers. Following a recommendation from the Independent Data Monitoring Committee of NCT04605159 (RSV MAT 009), GSK made the decision to stop enrolment and vaccination in the study. Ongoing study participants at that time continued to be monitored as part of the study.
The proposed trial is a prospective, randomized (1:1) trial plan examining whether more routine and frequent measurement of Patient Related Outcome Measures (PROMs) in the care of patients with MS improves patient depression and anxiety outcomes in addition to patient care satisfaction. The investigators plan to randomize people with MS (PwMS) to an intensive arm of filling out patient reported outcome measures every 6 months, with communication to their neurologist about their scores, versus a control arm, where participants fill out patient reported outcomes less frequently (annually) and their scores are not released to their MS Clinic/Neurologist. The primary outcome is to see if more frequent PROM completion leads to less depression and anxiety for people with MS. The investigators also plan to measure their satisfaction of care with their MS Clinic/neurologist and satisfaction in a shared decision-making process. Whether this improves care in patients with MS is currently unknown, and the investigators want to explore this with the current study. The investigators plan to randomize people with MS (PwMS) to an intensive arm of filling out patient reported outcome measures every 6 months, with communication to their neurologist about their scores, versus a control arm, where participants fill out patient reported outcomes less frequently (annually) and their scores are not released to their MS Clinic/Neurologist. The primary outcome is to see if more frequent PROM completion leads to less anxiety for people with MS. The investigators also plan to measure their satisfaction of care with their MS Clinic/neurologist and satisfaction in a shared decision-making process.
Randomized, multicenter, open-label, Phase 3 registration study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of milademetan compared to trabectedin in patients with unresectable (i.e., where resection is deemed to cause unacceptable morbidity or mortality) or metastatic DD liposarcoma that progressed on 1 or more prior systemic therapies, including at least 1 anthracycline-based therapy.
Low back pain is presently the first cause of disability worldwide. The most recommended interventions by clinical guidelines are exercises and cognitive behavioral therapy although the effect is modest. However, no approach is superior when given to a heterogeneous group of subjects with chronic low back pain (CLBP). This is probably due to the multiple factors associated with CLBP which are biophysical, psychological and social. Thus, each patient presents with a unique profile of factors contributing to their pain and could benefit from an approach tailored to their profile. In other words, it is crucial to identify the right treatment, for the right person, at the right moment. For example, the presence of important psychological factors such as anxiety and depression are risk factors for low back pain to develop and persist over time. The main aim of this project is to determine the feasibility to perform a large clinical trial comparing the efficacy of a two physiotherapy's approaches to treat CLBP (i.e., a psychologically-informed physiotherapy intervention compared to usual physiotherapy) in patients with CLBP presenting a high level of psychological factors.
Patients will receive a vaccine called SurVaxM on this study. While vaccines are usually thought of as ways to prevent diseases, vaccines can also be used to treat cancer. SurVaxM is designed to tell the body's immune system to look for tumor cells that express a protein called survivin and destroy them. The survivin protein can be found on up to 95% of glioblastomas and other types of cancer but is not found in normal cells. If the body's immune system knows to destroy cells that express survivin, it may help to control tumor growth and recurrence. SurVaxM will be mixed with Montanide ISA 51 before it is given. Montanide ISA 51 is an ingredient that helps create a stronger immune response in people, which helps the vaccine work better. This study has two phases: Priming and Maintenance. During the Priming Phase, patients will get one dose of SurVaxM combined with Montanide ISA 51 through a subcutaneous injection (a shot under the skin) at the start of the study and every 2 weeks for 6 weeks (for a total of 4 doses). At the same time that patients get the SurVaxM/Montanide ISA 51 injection, they will also get a second subcutaneous injection of a medicine called sargramostim. Sargramostim is given close to the SurVaxM//Montanide ISA 51 injection and works to stimulate the immune system to help the SurVaxM/Montanide ISA 51 work more effectively. If a patient completes the Priming Phase without severe side effects and his or her disease stays the same or improves, he or she can continue to the Maintenance Phase. During the Maintenance Phase, the patient will get a SurVaxM/Montanide ISA 51 dose along with a sargramostim dose about every 8 weeks for up to two years. After a patient finishes the study treatment, the doctor and study team will continue to follow his/her condition and watch for side effects up to 3 years following the last dose of SurVaxM/Montanide ISA 51. Patients will be seen in clinic every 3 months during the follow-up period.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of rilematovir compared to placebo with respect to the time to resolution of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) symptoms.
In collaboration with involved healthcare professionals and a patient advisory committee, this study tests the feasibility of using the Opal smartphone app to daily capture self-reported physical and psychological symptoms and vital signs among 50 people who are self-isolating at home with COVID-19. A healthcare team at Montreal's MUHC will remotely monitor their condition and offer advice and teleconsultations, as needed.