There are about 10004 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Brazil. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The primary objective of this randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multi-center trial is to determine the efficacy of BIBW 2992 given as an add-on to chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC Stage IIIb or IV progressing after BIBW 2992 monotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone in this patient population. Patients on both treatment arms will receive best supportive care in addition to study treatment. Patients enrolled into the trial will be treated and followed until death or lost to follow-up. Additional information on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) will be collected.
The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of post-operative inspiratory muscle training on muscle strength and endurance in patients with obesity submitted to gastroplasty.
Primary Objective: Phase 1: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/maximum administered dose (MAD) of SAR650984 (Isatuximab). Phase 2 (stage 1): To evaluate the activity of single-agent Isatuximab at different doses/schedules and to select dose and regimen to further evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) of Isatuximab as single agent or in combination with dexamethasone. Phase 2 (stage 2): To evaluate the activity in terms of overall response rate (ORR) of Isatuximab at the selected dose/schedule from stage1, as single agent (ISA arm) and in combination with dexamethasone (ISAdex arm). Secondary Objectives: Phase 1: - To characterize the global safety profile including cumulative toxicities. - To evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of Isatuximab in the proposed dosing schedule(s). - To assess the pharmacodynamics (PD), immune response, and preliminary disease response. Phase 2 (stage 1): to evaluate the following objectives for Isatuximab as single agent: - Safety - Efficacy as measured by duration of response, clinical benefit rate, progression free survival, overall survival. Phase 2 (stage 2): to evaluate the following objectives in each arm (ISA and ISAdex): - Safety - Efficacy as measured by duration of response, clinical benefit rate, progression free survival, overall survival. - Participant-reported changes in health-related quality of life, symptoms of multiple myeloma and generic health status. - Pharmacokinetic profile of Isatuximab. - Immunogenicity of Isatuximab. - Investigate the relationship between CD38 receptor density and CD38 receptor occupancy (Stage 1 only) on multiple myeloma cells and parameters of clinical response.
The purpose of the study is to assess the correlation of FMD of brachial artery and carotid intima media thickness with ED severity and clinical response to vardenafil in hypertensive men.
This study evaluates the use of dexmedetomidine or chloral hydrate for sedation during electroencephalography in patients with neurological disorders. The hypothesis is that this drugs provides similar changes in EEG pattern.
Major surgeries not involving the heart are common, and major heart problems during or after such surgeries represent a large population health problem. Few treatments to prevent heart problems around the time of surgery have been tested. There is encouraging data suggesting that small doses of Acetyl-Salicylic Acid (ASA) and Clonidine, which are two medications, given individually for a short period before and after major surgeries may prevent major heart problems. The POISE-2 Trial is a large international study to test if ASA and Clonidine can prevent heart attacks and deaths from heart problems around the time of surgery.
Evaluate the effect of probiotics on stool output in children 1 - 18 months old.
This study primary objective and endpoints are compare the efficacy of two products containing filgrastim, evaluating if the formulation produced by Eurofarma can be considered non-inferior to the reference product.
This is a randomized trial with participants recruited from one dialysis unit of a Brazilian university hospital. Hemodialysis patients were assigned to receive the resistance exercise combined with an aerobic training or the resistance training alone for a period of 10 weeks. The functional performance of patients was assessed before and after the intervention through the six-minute walk test (6MWT). The difference over time of the 6MWT was compared between the groups through multivariate linear regression. Thirteen patients were allocated for each group of intervention. The difference in distance walked before and after intervention in the combined training group was of +39.7 (61.4) meters, and this difference in the resistance training group was of -19.2 (53.9) meters, p=0.01. In multivariate analysis with adjustment for age, skin color, gender, hematocrit, time since starting dialysis, Kt/V and baseline values of 6MWT, the type of training remained significantly associated with the amount of increase in walked distance. Although the best protocol of exercise for patients on dialysis is not yet clear, in the investigators sample of hemodialysis patients the combination of aerobic and resistance training was more effective to improve functional performance.
Primary Objective: - To demonstrate the superior efficacy (composite of all-cause death + Myocardial Infarction (MI)) of Otamixaban to Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) + Eptifibatide Secondary Objectives: - To demonstrate the superior efficacy (composite of all-cause death + MI + any stroke) of Otamixaban as compared to UFH + Eptifibatide - To document the effect of Otamixaban on rehospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization due to a new episode of myocardial ischemia/myocardial infarction as compared to UFH + eptifibatide - To document the effect on mortality (all cause death) of Otamixaban as compared to UFH + eptifibatide - To document the safety of Otamixaban as compared to UFH + eptifibatide - To document the effect of Otamixaban on thrombotic procedural complications during the index Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) as compared to UFH + eptifibatide