There are about 10004 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Brazil. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Our long-term goal is to decrease cervical cancer incidence and mortality among women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) by using the most efficacious and acceptable screening method, particularly among women who do not come to the clinic for their regular Pap testing. The purpose of this feasibility study is to compare three cervical cancer screening modalities (self-collection and HPV testing, Pap testing at the public health clinic, and choice between self-collection and HPV testing and Pap testing) among women who have not undergone cervical cancer screening within the past four years using a theory-based, culturally relevant intervention implemented by Community Health Workers (CHWs) via door-to-door visits. Three Basic Health Units (BHUs) within the public health system will be randomly assigned to one of the three screening modalities/conditions (self-collection and HPV testing, Pap testing at the local public health clinic, and choice between self-collection and HPV testing and Pap testing). CHWs will invite women who report not having been screened for cervical cancer in the past four years to participate in the study, and deliver a brief educational/behavioral session on cervical cancer and screening using a door-to-door approach under of one of the three conditions. The primary outcome will be adherence to cervical cancer screening. We hypothesize that (1) Women in the "choice" and "self-collection" groups will be more likely to engage in cervical cancer screening and display higher satisfaction with their screening than women assigned to the "Pap" with women assigned to the "choice" group having the highest adherence of the three groups; and (2) Within the "choice" group, more women will choose and complete self-collection than Pap test.
The objective of this study is to evaluate, through clinical, microbiological and immunological tests, the changes during the experimental gingivitis and mucositis model, between teeth and implants, and between patients with a history of aggressive periodontitis and healthy individuals.
Introduction: The Mechanical Ventilation (MV), a support method used in Intensive Care Units (ICU), reaches approximately 90% of critical patients whose withdrawal process represents 40% of the total time of their use. For this purpose Transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation (TEDS), which by means of electrodes placed in motor action points on the phrenic nerve tend to provide improvement of the diaphragm muscle function. Objective: To analyze the effect of two protocols of transcutaneous electrical diaphragmatic stimulation on the ventilatory and cardiorespiratory parameters of critically ill patients. Method: Clinical, longitudinal, prospective, quantitative, single center trial will be performed with 30 (thirty) participants in invasive mechanical ventilatory support, randomly divided into three groups: Experimental Group 1 (GE-1; n = 10) where they will be submitted to the TEDS protocol; Experimental Group 2 (GE-2; n = 10), where they will be submitted to the TEDS protocol based on the studies of Cancelliero et al. (2012); Control Group (GC; n = 10) where they will not be submitted to TEDS. All groups will receive physiotherapeutic care from the staff of the adult ICU of the FHCGV. The interventions will consist of ten sessions of Physical Therapy in each participant in the afternoon shift, for ten consecutive days, 1 time a day. For the TEDS procedure, the Orion TENS II (Orion-SP-Brazil) model will be used, the Wright analogue respirometer (Spire-SP-Brazil) will be used for the minute volume evaluation (V'). The variables of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) will also be monitored in order to verify if the TEDS application interferes with the hemodynamic variables of these patients. The data collected will be linked to Microsoft Office Excel® 2010 software and later transformed into tables and graphs. The information collected will be submitted to statistical analysis through the statistical package SPSS 22.0, applying the descriptive statistics for the characterization of the sample and then selecting the specific tests for the respective variances, adopting a level of significance of p≤0.05 for statistical inferences.
This study evaluates the dentoskeletal effects produced by two maxillary protraction protocols in adolescent patients. Half of participants will be treated with a tooth-borne and tooth-bone-borne expanders as anchorage in the maxillary arch. Miniscrews will be used as anchorage in the mandibular arch for both groups.
In Brazil, sertraline is currently available as film coated tablets for oral administration containing sertraline hydrochloride equivalent to 50 mg or 100 mg sertraline. The sponsor has developed an oral solution formulation containing 20 mg/mL of sertraline, which must be diluted with 120 mL of water, ginger ale, lime/lemon soda or orange juice to be palatable before use. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relative bioavailability of Zoloft oral solution compared to Zoloft tablets in healthy participants under fasted conditions.
Subjects who completed either D5180C00007 or D5180C00009 will be offered the opportunity to consent for the Multicentre, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 3, Safety Extension Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Tezepelumab in Adults and Adolescents with Severe Uncontrolled Asthma. The study consists of a treatment phase, followed by a follow-up phase where subjects will not receive IP. The length of the follow up phase is determined by which study the subject had previously completed.
This study will assess the dentoskeletal effects of two types of maxillary expanders in orthodontic patients in the mixed dentition, from 7 to 11 years old. Half of participants will be treated using the expander with differential opening, while the other half will undergo rapid maxillary expansion using the fan-type expander. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between dentoskeletal effects of the two protocols.
The health benefits of physical activity (PA) are well documented and include improving in cardiovascular, obesity, mental health and all-cause mortality. Although higher levels of activity in patients with asthma are also associated with better outcomes, patients still avoid physical activity due to concern about exacerbating their asthma symptoms by the exercise induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), sustaining a vicious cycle of inactivity and worse asthma control. Many studies have reported the benefits of supervised exercise training on several asthma outcomes, such as exacerbations, asthma control, cardiopulmonary fitness, airway inflammation and psychosocial symptoms; however, the translation of the improvements in the exercise capacity into increments in PA levels is less evident and still controversial. Therefore, the hypothesis of this study is that behavioural interventions using strategies based on well-established psychosocial models are effective in increasing physical activity levels and decrease sedentary behaviour in adults with asthma, which will be associated with improvements in the asthma control.
This study compares the dentoalveolar and skeletal effects of bonded spurs associated with build-ups versus conventional bonded spurs in the early treatment of anterior open bite patients. Half of participants will be treated with bonded spurs associated with build-ups, while the other half will be treated with conventional bonded spurs. The null hypothesis to be tested is that there are no differences for the dentoalveolar and skeletal effects between the two protocols.
This study evaluate the ability of phenylephrine and of noradrenaline to maintain normal systemic arterial blood pressure and heart rate in healthy pregnant women submitted to cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. Half of participants will receive bolus of phenylephrine while the other half will receive bolus of noradrenaline.