There are about 13446 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Belgium. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Chronic liver disease/fibrosis can be the result of various causes, and the result is that the liver tissue becomes stiff. ShearWave™ elastography, available on the Aixplorer® ultrasound system, is a method that can be used to measure the stiffness of organs in the body, for example the liver. This study will evaluate how this technology performs as a non-invasive test to stage liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease.
The purpose of this First-in-Human study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability after single ascending oral doses of GLPG1690 given to healthy male subjects, compared to placebo. Also, the safety and tolerability of multiple ascending oral doses of GLPG1690 given to healthy male subjects daily for 14 days compared to placebo, will be evaluated. Furthermore, during the course of the study after single and multiple oral dose administrations, the amount of GLPG1690 present in the blood and urine (pharmacokinetics) as well as the reduction of biomarker levels by GLPG1690 in plasma samples (pharmacodynamics) will be characterized compared to placebo. The pharmacokinetics of a solid dosage formulation of GLPG1690 will be compared with those of a liquid dosage formulation of GLPG1690. Also, the potential of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 induction after repeated dosing with GLPG1690 will be explored.
The purpose of this study is to find out whether it is better to receive a new drug, BBI608, in addition to paclitaxel chemotherapy or better to receive paclitaxel chemotherapy alone as second line treatment for gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer after prior first line platinum and fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy.
To estimate the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving high (> 20%) FN-risk chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis.
Purpose of the study is the visualization of the mesh and the determination of the mesh surface observed by MRI at 3 weeks and 13 months after ventral hernia repair with mesh visible IPOM (Dynamesh®). We want to prove that with this type of mesh it is possible to visualize the mesh position in vivo in a safe manner. This provides long-term benefit to early recognize possible recurrence caused by shifting or shrinking of the mesh and to provide early treatment.
Phase IV Design : Prospective, open-label, randomized three-arms study Main Inclusion criteria Luminal Crohn's disease patients with steroid free remission for at least 6 months and a combination therapy with infliximab and anti-metabolites for at least 8 months Primary objective To demonstrate that Infliximab scheduled maintenance with or without antimetabolites is superior to antimetabolites alone to maintain sustained steroid-free remission over 2 years, while the latter is non inferior with regards to the mean time spent in remission over the same duration Main co-primary end points Clinical relapse rate at 2 years Mean remission duration within 2 years Study treatment Infliximab, Mercaptopurine, azathioprine, methotrexate. Number of subjects 225 randomized patients (75 per arm) Study duration: 3 + 2 years Enrollment: 3 years Follow-up: 2 years
This study will have two parts as follows: The PK Lead-in Phase of the study will evaluate the steady state pharmacokinetics (PK) and confirm the dose of sofosbuvir (SOF) in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected pediatric participants. The PK Lead-in Phase will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of 7 days of dosing of SOF+ribavirin (RBV) in HCV-infected pediatric participants. The Treatment Phase will be initiated by age cohort after confirmation of age-appropriate SOF dosage levels. Participants from the PK Lead-in Phase will immediately rollover into the Treatment Phase with no interruption of study drug administration. The Treatment Phase will evaluate the antiviral efficacy, safety, and tolerability of SOF+RBV for 12 or 24 weeks in pediatric participants with genotype 2 or 3 HCV infection, respectively.
The primary objective of the study was to provide required access of investigational product (darbepoetin alfa) beyond the end of the active treatment period (EOATP) of the darbepoetin alfa MDS 20090160 (NCT01362140) study for patients who had continued demonstration of benefit from darbepoetin alfa treatment and to describe the safety of longer-term use in this patient population.
The primary objective of this trial is as follows: To determine the pharmacokinetics of micafungin given twice weekly in patients at risk for developing an invasive fungal disease (patients who are being treated for acute or chronic graft versus host disease; patients receiving reduced intensity conditioning for Stem Cell Transplant (SCT); receiving first remission induction chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leucaemia (AML)/MyeloDysplasticSyndrome (MDS)) compared to the pharmacokinetics of micafungin given daily. The secondary objective of this trial is as follows: To determine whether adequate exposure of micafungin is attained. To determine the safety of micafungin in this patient population
Most people are born with the ability to digest lactose, a dissacharide consisting of β-D-glucose and β-D-galactose, because of the presence of lactase at the brush border of the small intestine. In about 75% of the world population the activity of this enzyme decreases after weaning (primary hypolactasia or lactase-nonpersistence), resulting in incomplete digestion of lactose and lactose malabsorption in adulthood (1). Secondary forms of lactose malabsorption may be due to inflammation or functional loss of the intestinal mucosa such as celiac disease, infectious enteritis or Crohn's disease. Very rarely, lactase deficiency is congenital due to an autosomal recessive genetic disorder, preventing lactase expression from birth (2). Whereas some people with lactose malabsorption are asymptomatic, most lactose-nonpersisters experience symptoms like abdominal pain, bloating, excess flatulence or diarrhea. Lactose intolerance refers to the syndrome of having one or more symptoms after consumption of lactose-containing food (3). At present, the origin of the symptoms of lactose-intolerance is not well understood. Several studies have indicated a poor correlation between lactose maldigestion and symptoms of lactose intolerance (4). In a study by Vonk et al. (2003), lactose intolerant subjects with severe symptoms (diarrhea) and intolerant subjects with only mild symptoms (without diarrhea) did not differ in degree of lactose digestion in the small intestine indicating a similar lactase activity and leading them to the hypothesis of a "colon resistence factor" (5). It was suggested that the colonic processing of maldigested lactose may play a role in the symptoms experienced by lactose intolerant patients. When lactose is malabsorbed and enters the colon, it is rapidly fermented by the resident microbiota into a variety of metabolites including lactate, formate, succinate and short chain fatty acids (SCFA, acetate, propionate, butyrate) as well as gases (H2, CO2 and CH4). When incubating fecal samples from lactose-tolerant and intolerant subjects with lactose, the samples from the lactose-intolerant subjects showed faster production rates of D- and L-lactate, acetate, propionate and butyrate, as compared to tolerant subjects (6). Although the colon is thought to possess a high capacity to absorb SCFA, it was hypothesized that a temporary accumulation of these metabolites due to rapid fermentation of maldigested lactose could be responsible for abdominal pain, excess flatulence and bloating (7;8). Possible mechanisms proposed to explain how SCFA might induce symptoms included an increase in the osmotic load that draws fluid to the colonic lumen, changes in colonic motility and an increased colonic sensitivity (9-11). However, the calculated amount of fluid drawn in the colon is unlikely to cause symptoms considering the high water absorbing capacity of the colon and the effect of SCFA on colonic motility and colonic sensitivity have only been observed in rats and not in humans. More recently, Campbell et al. introduced the bacterial metabolic toxin hypothesis, stating that also other bacterial metabolites, such as alcohols, aldehydes, acids and ketones, resulting from carbohydrate fermentation play a role in the pathogenesis of lactose-intolerance. These metabolites might inhibit bacterial growth and affect eukaryotic cells (12). In our own previous studies in which we related colonic fermentation patterns to parameters of cytotoxicity, we identified compounds like propionic acid, medium chain fatty acids, 1-octanol and heptanal as more prevalent in the most cytotoxic samples (13), supporting the hypothesis of Campbell et al. Therefore, it seems necessary to include not only SCFA, but also other metabolites, in the investigation of the pathogenesis of lactose intolerance. Differences in fermentation patterns might be associated with differences in the composition and/or activity of the intestinal microbiota. Evidence on the potential role of the colonic microbiota in lactose intolerance is very limited. Total bacterial numbers were not significantly different between 16 intolerant and 11 tolerant lactose maldigesters although a negative correlation between total bacteria and symptom score was found (14). Similarly, the composition of fecal microbiota was not different between 5 intolerant and 7 tolerant subjects (6).