There are about 13446 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Belgium. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a fixed dose combination (FDC) containing bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) versus dolutegravir (DTG) + a FDC containing emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF) in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral treatment-naive adults.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a fixed dose combination (FDC) containing bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) versus a FDC containing abacavir/dolutegravir/lamivudine (ABC/DTG/3TC) in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral treatment naive-adults.
Background: Sedation and therapeutic hypothermia (TH) delay neurological responses and might reduce the accuracy of clinical examination to predict outcome after cardiac arrest (CA). Electroencephalography (EEG) and somato-sensory evoked potentials (SSEP) might significantly improve prognostication of post-CA coma, however, EEG and SSEP are not always available and require specific expertise for their interpretation. Automated video pupillometry is a novel electronic device that contains an infrared light camera which enables to measure quantitatively the percentage of pupillary reaction to a calibrated light stimulation. In a recent study of a cohort of comatose CA survivors (n=50 patients) it was found that quantitative PLR was more accurate than standard PLR (manual pen light) in predicting 3-month outcome, irrespective of temperature and sedation, and had comparable prognostic accuracy than electrophysiological exams, including electroencephalography (EEG) and somato-sensory evoked potentials (SSEP). Aim of the study: In light of these promising results, the investigators would like to confirm the prognostic value of quantitative PLR in a large multicenter cohort of comatose post-CA patients. Design of the study: Prospective, multicenter, observational outcome trial.
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study of the efficacy and safety of iclaprim compared to vancomycin for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections.
To investigate and compare the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of BI 695501 administered subcutaneously via prefilled syringe or autoinjector
This is a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2-3 study of patients diagnosed with advanced unresectable dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Approximately 342 total patients will be randomized to study treatment (selinexor or placebo).
This study comprises a Dose Escalation phase followed by a Dose Expansion phase. Dose Escalation part of the study will assess the safety and tolerability and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) as the recommended Phase 2 (RP2D) dose for each regimen. Participants will be assigned to one of the 4 regimens in Dose Escalation phase: Regimen A: mirvetuximab soravtansine administered with bevacizumab; Regimen B: mirvetuximab soravtansine administered with carboplatin; Regimen C: mirvetuximab soravtansine administered with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; or Regimen D: mirvetuximab soravtansine administered with pembrolizumab. Dose Expansion of the study will further assess safety, tolerability and preliminary anti-tumor activity of mirvetuximab soravtansine. A Dose Expansion phase is planned for Regimen A and Regimen D and will open pending Sponsor decision; participants enrolled in the Dose Expansion phase will receive study treatment at the MTD or RP2D determined during Dose Escalation. For Regimen A, participants in the Dose Expansion phase may be enrolled according to prior exposure to bevacizumab into 3 Dose Expansion Cohorts as follows: 1) Dose Expansion Cohort 1: bevacizumab naïve; 2) Dose Expansion Cohort 2: bevacizumab pretreated; and 3) Dose Expansion Cohort 3: one to three prior treatments, one of which could have been bevacizumab. A triplet Regimen (Regimen E: mirvetuximab soravtansine + bevacizumab + carboplatin) will be opened to evaluate the safety and tolerability and to assess any early signs of activity in participants dosed with the combination regimen. All mirvetuximab soravtansine doses were calculated according to adjusted ideal body weight.
Patients who receive a kidney transplant have to learn in 10-14 days which anti-rejection medication to take, how to take it ,... This learning process is attended by the nurses of the ward. This study wants to measure the degree of medication knowledge, health literacy and medication adherence of those patients.
This randomized active-controlled multicenter Phase III open-label study will evaluate and compare between treatment groups the efficacy of alectinib versus chemotherapy in participants with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC who were previously treated with chemotherapy and crizotinib, as measured by investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and to evaluate and compare between treatment groups the central nervous system (CNS) objective response rate (C-ORR) in participants with measurable CNS metastases at baseline, as assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC).
The main purpose of this study is to compare maintenance treatment with avelumab plus best supportive care (BSC) with BSC alone, to determine if avelumab has an effect on survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer that did not worsen during or following completion of first-line chemotherapy.