View clinical trials related to Coronary Stenosis.
Filter by:Traditionally, the severity of a blockage (stenosis) in a coronary artery has been determined by visual angiographic assessment of the diameter of the artery at the level of a blockage compared to a normal healthy area of the same artery. With the advent of invasive physiological testing to assess coronary blood flow, multiple clinical trials have demonstrated a clinical benefit to a physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) approach. However, despite this and the potential for significant variation in the interpretation of coronary artery stenosis severity by visual angiography alone to guide PCI, invasive physiologic indices remain significantly under-utilized. The purpose of this study is to investigate the physiologic significance of coronary lesions deemed angiographically severe by visual estimation that are planned for PCI. The investigators plan to perform blinded physiologic assessment pre and post PCI. The primary aim of the study is to determine whether a subset of lesions visually estimated as severe by angiography treated with stent placement/PCI may in fact not be physiologically significant when assessed invasively, and thus PCI could safely be deferred in these patients. A secondary aim is to evaluate physiologic assessment post PCI to detect residual ischemia that could be utilized to optimize stent placement.
This is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm, open-label, First in Human clinical trial to provide preliminary evidence for the safety and efficacy of the novel IoNIR stent system.
With the emergence of advanced technology to date in the artificial intelligence (AI), computer aided diagnosis has gradually gained its popularity in the field of healthcare. Particularly, in the clinical practice of coronary artery disease diagnosis, the application of AI could be of great implication in alleviating the shortage of medical sources. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the AI-based coronary CT angiographic analysis software (RuiXin-CoronaryAI) for diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis, a retrospective, multi-center, cross-over designed, blinded, sensitivity superiority and specificity non-inferiority clinical trial will be conducted.
Patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) diagnosed without significant lesions in invasive coronary angiography (ischemia non-obstructive coronary artery disease - INOCA) represent approximately 50% of all patients with CCS. Results of FAME study clearly showed that evaluation of coronary circulation should not be accomplished only with visual assessment in resting conditions. Current European Society of Cardiology Guidelines of diagnosis and treatment of CCS published in 2019 emphasize the necessity of performing complex coronary physiology assessment. Invasive physiological measurements and vasoreactivity provocative tests emerged as key tools to differentiate between vasospastic angina, microcirculatory angina, overlap of both conditions or non-cardiac disease. According to contemporary literature, identification of heterogeneity of patients with INOCA is crucial for determination of adequate treatment. An appropriate pharmacotherapy has a potential to improve outcomes including grade of angina, quality of life, exertional tolerance and most important - MACCE (major adverse cardiac and cardiovascular events) free survival. However, there is a lack of evidence on each of the subtypes of INOCA especially in those with signs and symptoms of vasospasm in provocative test but without visual spasm in epicardial vessels.
This is an on-label clinical study design intended for the collection of three different types of interventional procedural data using FDA-cleared cardiac catheterization technologies and drugs, each used according to its product labeling and standard practice of medicine.
In this randomized clinical trial, the researchers are investigating whether a multi-component virtual/hybrid cardiac rehabilitation program will improve functional status, cholesterol level, overall cardiovascular health, individual risk factors, quality of life and mental health for patients who have recently been diagnosed with myocardial infarction, received a coronary stent, underwent heart surgery or catheter-based valve replacement, as compared to usual care.
ULTRA is a multicenter, observational, retrospective registry, enrolling consecutive patients treated with ultrathin coronary DES (coronary stent with strut thickness < 70 um) for coronary bifurcation lesions, left main disease, chronic total coronary occlusion, and in-stent restenosis regardless of their clinical presentation. Target lesion failure (TLF a composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization and definite stent thrombosis) will be the primary end point, while its single components will be the secondary ones along with all-cause death, all acute myocardial infarction (excluding peri-procedural AMI), target vessel revascularization and BARC major bleedings (BARC 3-5). Due to the retrospective, observational nature of the registry, no formal sample size estimation is required. Patients complying with detailed inclusion criteria and with a minimum follow up of 6 months will be enrolled.
Multidisciplinary team-approach in order to offer personalized treatments represents the emerging mainstream in cardiovascular medicine. "Hybrid operative rooms" allow to offer selected heart-disease patients truly "tailored" operations. This study wants to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Hybrid Procedures in cardiac patients in three subgroups of patients: - Hybrid coronary revascularization strategy (coronary by-pass + PCI); - Hybrid valve and coronary disease correction (combination of surgical valve replacement and PCI); - Hybrid coronary and carotid artery disease treatment (combination of coronary by-pass and carotid stenting). The investigators hypothesize that morbidity might be reduced by 50% in hybrid procedures group as compared with predicted Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) score.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether exercise testing can detect an obstruction in a coronary artery, and, thereby, can avoid performing a coronary imaging in some cases. Patients with a suspicion of coronary artery disease perform an exercise test on an exercise bike with increasing load. EKG, blood pressure, and other parameters are monitored. Patients benefit also of either a cardiac CT scan or a coronary angiography to establish whether they really have coronary obstruction.
The purpose of the current study is to assess complete coronary physiology (FFR, RFR, CFR, IMR, and CT-FFR) in TAVI candidates with intermediate coronary artery stenosis before and 6 months after TAVI. This aims to determine how TAVI affects coronary blood flow and coronary microcirculatory function after longer-term follow-up, and how these effects influence FFR and RFR values. In addition, it is aimed to correlate invasive functional testing (FFR and RFR) with non-invasive CT-FFR before and 6 months after TAVI.