View clinical trials related to Coronary Disease.
Filter by:China patients in end stage renal disease receiving maintenance dialysis have a high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), with a prevalence of 45.5% approximately, and coronary artery disease (CAD) has been identified as the most common one. It remains unclear that what their treatment status is and whether this group of patients can benefit from revascularization in China. The investigators plan to recruit around 30 hospitals from 7 regions as study centers, which represent different levels of economic development in Mainland China. The detailed information includes demographics, medical history, coronary angiogram, in-hospital treatment and procedures, short-term and long-term outcomes. The aim of the study is to provide the real world knowledge about current status of coronary revascularization and prognosis in patients with CAD and dialysis.
Yearly, 180 000 patients in the Netherlands are referred to a cardiologist with symptoms suspected of coronary artery disease (CAD). To assess this, multiple diagnostic tests are available. Non-invasive imaging tests, such as coronary CT-scan, are safe, relatively cheap and can effectively rule-out CAD. However, when CAD is present, coronary CT-scan cannot assess the restriction in blood flow caused by the stenosis. Cardiac angiography with invasive blood flow measurements is required to assess this restriction in blood flow. This is an invasive test, more expensive than CT and it is accompanied by certain risks. Most patients in whom CAD is present do not need treatment, and would therefore benefit from non-invasive diagnostic tests. To reduce the number of unnecessary cardiac angiography with flow measurements, new imaging techniques have been developed. These techniques use CT- or angiographic images to calculate the restriction in coronary blood flow and determine the need for treatment. This study is designed to assess the safety and efficacy of these techniques when used as an addition to coronary CT-scan. Subjects are eligible if their CT-scan indicates possibly significant CAD. To determine need for treatment of a subject's CAD, the investigators will randomize subjects in three arms. One arm consists of additional CT-derived calculation of coronary blood flow, one arm consists of angiography-derived calculation of coronary blood flow and one arm consists of standard care, coronary angiography and invasive coronary blood flow measurements. After these tests, subjects are treated and followed according to routine care guidelines. Additionally, subjects are requested to complete 5 questionnaires in a 12 month follow-up period. The investigators expect that the total number of invasive cardiac angiographies with additional blood flow measurements can be reduced by half with the use of new imaging techniques. The investigators expect that this will lead to a reduction in healthcare costs, complications and a lower burden of diagnostic tests for patients. The investigators do not expect a difference in primary endpoints between the study groups.
The FAST III is a randomized controlled, open-label, multicenter, international, non-inferiority, strategy trial. A total of 2228 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either vFFR- or FFR guided revascularization. Patients will be consented prior to the procedure and then followed up to 12 (+1) months after randomization. The primary endpoint is analyzed at 12 months after randomization. Approximately 35 sites in 7 European countries (Netherlands, Ireland, United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Spain, and France).
The investigators prognostic impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) and of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with indication of TAVI is controversial, particularly in elderly population where CAD and aortic stenosis (AS) are frequent and commonly coexisted. (1-2) The primary end point of this prospective study is to compare major cardiovascular event at one year of follow up in patients over 80 years with severe aortic stenosis who referred for TAVI with or without associated CAD. The investigators will also assess (secondary endpoint) the impact of PCI on symptoms, major events and quality of life using geriatric parameters. The study will be conducted in the University hospital of Montpellier between November 2020 and November 2022
PIONEER-IV is a prospective, single-blind (patient), randomized, 1:1, controlled, multi-center study comparing clinical outcomes between angiography-derived physiology guidance to LRDP and usual care in an all-comers patient population (including patients with high bleeding risk, HBR) undergoing PCI with unrestrictive use of the HT Supreme sirolimus-eluting stent. Patients will be randomized to either angio-based physiology guidance angio-FFR (Quantitative Flow Ratio and coronary angiography-derived FFR, caFFR) or local routine diagnostic procedure (LRDP) and usual care. Patients will be treated with 1-year P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 1-month of dual-antiplatelet therapy in approximately 2540 (2*1270) patients. All patients (both cohorts) must receive dual anti-platelet therapy, being aspirin (ASA) and ticagrelor for 1 month, followed by 11 months of ticagrelor only (i.e. monotherapy). At 1 year, ticagrelor monotherapy is replaced by aspirin monotherapy or left to the discretion of the operator.
Aortic valve stenosis (AS) affects 2-7% of persons > 65 years, symptoms include: angina and dyspnea, dizziness and syncope. Coincidence of coronary artery disease (CAD), also presenting with angina and dyspnea, in patients with AS between 40 - 65% . Angina in AS caused by significant reduction of coronary flow reserve (CFR). CFR is the ratio of maximal flow increase in the coronary vessel bed during maximal hyperaemia (medically or exercise induced). FFR (fractional flow reserve) use in patients with AS potentially invalid due to dysfunctional CFR leading to potential undertreatment of CAD in these patients.CFR disturbance in AS mainly due to myocardial overload causing concentric hypertrophy, increased oxygen consumption and neurohormonal activation leading to increased vascular resistance. Current studies are investigating the validity of FFR and iFR in AS patients. Recent data demonstrate very good correlation between FFR and iFR derived values to PET myocardial perfusion imaging values in patients with no evidence of AS. Our study aims to investigate the diagnostic performance of FFR and iFR in intermediate-grade coronary stenosis in patients with severe aortic valve disease and correlate FFR- and iFR derived values with those extracted from PET-perfusion Imaging.
This study aims to examine the effects of an internet-based cardica rehabilitation enhancement (i-CARE) programme for coronary artery disease (CAD) patients on self-care behaviour, biomarkers, physiological, anthropometric parameters, clinical outcomes and self-reported health outcomes and to understand why and how i-CARE influences patients' health behaviours.
To evaluate intravascular attenuation of the coronary arteries and image quality in an individualized scan and CM injection protocol whereas both scan and injection parameters are tailored to the individual patient in a North American, European and Asian patient population. To evaluate the radiation dose and contrast media dose of this individualized approach for CCTA in an American, European and Chinese patient population. To evaluate the injection parameters required for an average American, European and Chinese patient population.
Discovered thousands of years ago, coffee is among the most consumed beverages in the world. The relationship between coffee and cardiovascular risk, more specifically coronary artery disease, is controversial. Platelet aggregation and its relationship with coffee is also controversial. The investigators propose this study to evaluate the relationship between coffee and platelet aggregability in patients with coronary artery disease.
The purpose of this study is to compare DCB with DES in stable CAD or ACS patients who are at high risk of bleeding. The hypothesis of the DEBATE trial is that the strategy using DCB and a shorter DAPT regimen is non-inferior to the treatment using DES and longer DAPT duration on patients with high bleeding risk. If non-inferiority is shown, the superiority of the DCB strategy over DES strategy will be tested.