Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05782738
Other study ID # 001-2023
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date June 1, 2023
Est. completion date June 1, 2029

Study information

Verified date April 2023
Source San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital
Contact Giulio Piedimonte, MD
Phone +393201764900
Email giulio.piedimonte@gmail.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The Reverse T-stenting And Minimal Protrusion (Reverse TAP) is an up-front 2-stent technique that treats complex coronary bifurcation. Compared to crush techniques, it does not require crushing of the side branch stent but only minimal protrusion of the side branch stent before main vessel stenting. Nowadays, no studies compare the Reverse-TAP and the External Minicrush in treating complex coronary bifurcation, so eventually, procedural, clinical and safety differences remain unknown.


Description:

According to DEFINITION criteria, PCI of the complex coronary bifurcation with up-front two stent techniques is associated with lower target vessel revascularisation (TVR) than Provisional Stenting. The Double-Kissing Crush stenting (DK-Crush) has been tested with the Culotte and the Classic Crush techniques in the unprotected left main disease (ULMD) and in no-ULMD setting, respectively, showing better clinical outcomes. However, due to its technical complexity and simultaneous improvement of the Classic Crush technique in the External Minicrush, the latter has become the most used technique in the clinical practice in treating complex coronary bifurcation. The DK-Crush technique has never been tested with the External Minicrush, leaving the operators to choose one or the other according to their experience and preferences. The Reverse T-stenting, And Minimal Protrusion (Reverse TAP) is an up-front 2-stent technique that treats complex coronary bifurcation. Compared to crush techniques, it does not require crushing of the side branch stent but only minimal protrusion of the side branch stent before main vessel stenting. Nowadays, studies need to compare the Reverse-TAP and the External Minicrush in treating complex coronary bifurcation, so eventually, procedural, clinical and safety differences remain unknown.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 361
Est. completion date June 1, 2029
Est. primary completion date June 1, 2026
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients >18 years old; - Patients with an indication of PCI, including Chronic Coronary syndrome (CCS) and Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), according to current guidelines recommendations; According to Medina and Definition criteria, patients with at least true and complex coronary lesions involved in coronary bifurcation. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients that refused informed consent; - Patients without valid vascular access that could make unsafe PCI; - Patients with an expected life of less than one year; - Patients with scheduled major surgery that required prolonged DAPT interruption; - Pregnant patients; - Patients with DAPT contraindications.

Study Design


Intervention

Procedure:
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Use dedicated two stents technique for treatment of coronary bifurcation stenosis

Locations

Country Name City State
Italy Azienda ospedaliera Santi Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo Alessandria
Italy Ciriè Hospital Ciriè Tori O
Italy L'Azienda Ospedaliera (AO) S. Croce e Carle Cuneo
Italy Ospedale Santa Croce Moncalieri Torino
Italy Interventional Unit, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Orbassano, and Rivoli Hospital, Turin, Italy Turin

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Acute closure of the side branch and periprocedural-MI. The investigators check safety of procedural profile between two techniques. Periprocedural
Other Intraprocedural ST and periprocedural-MI The investigators check safety of procedural profile between two techniques. Periprocedural
Other Major bleeding (BARC 3 and 5) The investigators check safety of hemorrhagic profile between two techniques in consideration of prolonged DAPT. 5-years
Other Technical success Defined as TIMI flow 3 and < 30% residual stenosis after PCI on target vessel Procedural
Other Procedural success Defined as technical success with no in-hospital major adverse Periprocedural
Other Cross-over between groups Possibility to switching between two techniques for technical reasons Periprocedural
Other Timing of rewiring Measure of the time spending in a crucial phase of the two techniques Periprocedural
Other Number of guide wire used Number of coronary guidewires to perform the assigned technique. Periprocedural
Other Amount of contrast medium used Total contrast medium used to perform the PCI with the technique assigned Periprocedural
Other Procedural time Total time used to perform the PCI Periprocedural
Other Fluoroscopic time Total fluoroscopic time spending to perform the PCI Periprocedural
Other X-rays exposition Total operators x-rays exposition during the PCI Periprocedural
Primary Target Lesion Failure (TLF) (Composite of all causes of death, non-fatal TVMI, ischemia-driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR) + Definite or probable ST+ ISR >50% at planned coronary angiography or Coro-TC. The investigators check eventually differences in technical and clinical performance between the two techniques through coronary angiography or Coro-TC (centre preferences). 12-moths
Secondary Cardiac death + TVMI + ST The investigators check mid-term cardiovascular clinical performance between the two techniques. 5-years
Secondary Cardiac death + TVMI + ST +TLR The investigators check mid-term cardiovascular clinical performance between the two techniques, including any revascularization of the target lesion site. 5-years
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06030596 - SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
Completed NCT04080700 - Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
Recruiting NCT03810599 - Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study N/A
Recruiting NCT06002932 - Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06032572 - Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE) N/A
Recruiting NCT05308719 - Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT04242134 - Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions N/A
Completed NCT04556994 - Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients. N/A
Recruiting NCT05846893 - Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT06027788 - CTSN Embolic Protection Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05023629 - STunning After Balloon Occlusion N/A
Completed NCT04941560 - Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
Completed NCT04006288 - Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Phase 4
Completed NCT01860274 - Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST N/A
Recruiting NCT06174090 - The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients N/A
Completed NCT03968809 - Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
Terminated NCT03959072 - Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
Recruiting NCT04566497 - Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up. N/A
Recruiting NCT05065073 - Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography Phase 4
Completed NCT05096442 - Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Korean Patients With Coronary De Novo Lesions N/A