Role of On-site CT-derived FFR in the Management of Suspect CAD Patients

Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Trial

— TARGET  

Official title:

The Effect of On-site CT-derived Fractional Flow Reserve on the Management Making for the Patients With Stable Chest Pain (TARGET Trial)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03901326
• Other study ID #: S2019-025-01
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: May 10, 2019
• Est. completion date: October 31, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: December 2023
• Source: Chinese PLA General Hospital
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The primary of this registry is to evaluate whether the availability of CTA/CT-FFR procedure could effectively optimize the flow of clinical practice of stable chest pain versus conventional clinical pathway in decision making, avoid the overuse of invasive procedure, finally improve clinical prognosis and reduce total medical expenditure. This registry is randomized, open labeled, prospective designed and will be performed in 6 Chinese hospitals. Approximately 1200 subjects will be enrolled and subsequently assigned to either routine clinically-indicated diagnostic care group (CID arm) or CTA/CT-FFR care group (CTA/CT-FFR arm) via computer-generated random numbers (1:1 ratio)

Description:

Based on the clinical fact that less stress myocardial perfusion scan are performed rather than stress exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) in China, more patients undergo coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) for determining whether they should be sent to catheter lab. However, nearly 30% of patients sent to catheter lab were found without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and this invasive procedure was unnecessary and overused partly. Fortunately, fractional flow reserve (FFR) based non-invasive CT algorithm technology (CT-FFR) showed a great potential in detecting functional myocardial ischemia related to coronary specific lesion (Discovery-Flow, DEFACTO and NXT trial)[1-3]. Moreover, clinical care guided by CT-FFR could provide benefits with equivalent clinical outcomes and lower expenditure, compared with routine clinical care over 1-year follow-up (Platform trial). On the other aspect, ADVANCE trial revealed that CT-FFR modified treatment recommendation was associated with less negative invasive coronary angiography (ICA), predicted revascularization and identified subjects at low risk of adverse events through 90 days in real-world. However, these studies was not randomized designed and selection bias still existed. So our trial aims to evaluate whether CTA/CT-FFR outperforms the regular diagnostic care in ruling out patients without significantly obstructive CAD before catheter lab and improving clinical prognosis during follow-up in a randomized design.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 1216
• Est. completion date: October 31, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: October 30, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 40 Years to 75 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• New-onset chest pain suspicious for CAD

• Coronary CTA result showed that the diameter stenosis is between 30 and 90% in at least one major coronary artery (coronary artery diameter = 2.5 mm)

• Intermediate-to-high pretest probability of CAD based on CAD Consortium Score

• No prior evaluation for this episode of symptoms

• Agree to participate in this clinical study and sign written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

• Diagnosed or suspected acute coronary syndrome requiring hospitalization or emergent testing

• Hemodynamically or clinically unstable condition systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or serious atrial or ventricular arrhythmias

• Known CAD with prior myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), or any angiographic evidence of = 50% stenosis in any major coronary artery

• Patients with left main branch stenosis = 50% or major coronary artery stenosis > 90%

• Known severe congenital, valvular (moderate and above), or cardiomyopathy process (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or reduced systolic left ventricular function = 40%) which could explain cardiac symptoms

• Unable to provide written informed consent or participate in long-term follow-up.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Coronary Artery Disease
• Coronary Disease
• Myocardial Ischemia

Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
• CT-FFR assessment
When subjects are randomized to the CTA/CT-FFR arm, FFR based on the coronary CTA imaging will be measured. DEEPVESSEL FFR workstation is very dedicated software utilizing the original CTA imaging to meter simulated FFR values based on a machine learning algorithm. The first step is to extract a 3D coronary artery model and generate coronary centerlines which are similar to the routine reconstruction of coronary CTA. The centerlines are extracted using a minimal path extraction filter. Then a novel path-based deep learning model, referred to DEEPVESSEL FFR, is used to predict the simulated FFR values on the vascular centerlines. Deep learning algorithm is used to establish characteristic sample database of coronary hemodynamics characteristic parameters. When deep training model is proved to be valid, it is applied to a new lesion-specific measurement. Lesion-specific CT-FFR is defined as simulated FFR value at distance of 20mm away from the lesion of interest.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
China	Chinese PLA General Hospital	Beijing	Beijing

Sponsors (6)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Chinese PLA General Hospital	Beijing Anzhen Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Tongji Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (10)

Colleran R, Douglas PS, Hadamitzky M, Gutberlet M, Lehmkuhl L, Foldyna B, Woinke M, Hink U, Nadjiri J, Wilk A, Wang F, Pontone G, Hlatky MA, Rogers C, Byrne RA. An FFRCT diagnostic strategy versus usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease planned for invasive coronary angiography at German sites: one-year results of a subgroup analysis of the PLATFORM (Prospective Longitudinal Trial of FFRCT: Outcome and Resource Impacts) study. Open Heart. 2017 Mar 22;4(1):e000526. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2016-000526. eCollection 2017. — View Citation

Collet C, Onuma Y, Andreini D, Sonck J, Pompilio G, Mushtaq S, La Meir M, Miyazaki Y, de Mey J, Gaemperli O, Ouda A, Maureira JP, Mandry D, Camenzind E, Macron L, Doenst T, Teichgraber U, Sigusch H, Asano T, Katagiri Y, Morel MA, Lindeboom W, Pontone G, Luscher TF, Bartorelli AL, Serruys PW. Coronary computed tomography angiography for heart team decision-making in multivessel coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2018 Nov 1;39(41):3689-3698. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy581. — View Citation

Douglas PS, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, Patel MR, Norgaard BL, Byrne RA, Curzen N, Purcell I, Gutberlet M, Rioufol G, Hink U, Schuchlenz HW, Feuchtner G, Gilard M, Andreini D, Jensen JM, Hadamitzky M, Chiswell K, Cyr D, Wilk A, Wang F, Rogers C, Hlatky MA; PLATFORM Investigators. 1-Year Outcomes of FFRCT-Guided Care in Patients With Suspected Coronary Disease: The PLATFORM Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Aug 2;68(5):435-445. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.057. — View Citation

Fairbairn TA, Nieman K, Akasaka T, Norgaard BL, Berman DS, Raff G, Hurwitz-Koweek LM, Pontone G, Kawasaki T, Sand NP, Jensen JM, Amano T, Poon M, Ovrehus K, Sonck J, Rabbat M, Mullen S, De Bruyne B, Rogers C, Matsuo H, Bax JJ, Leipsic J, Patel MR. Real-world clinical utility and impact on clinical decision-making of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: lessons from the ADVANCE Registry. Eur Heart J. 2018 Nov 1;39(41):3701-3711. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy530. — View Citation

Jensen JM, Botker HE, Mathiassen ON, Grove EL, Ovrehus KA, Pedersen KB, Terkelsen CJ, Christiansen EH, Maeng M, Leipsic J, Kaltoft A, Jakobsen L, Sorensen JT, Thim T, Kristensen SD, Krusell LR, Norgaard BL. Computed tomography derived fractional flow reserve testing in stable patients with typical angina pectoris: influence on downstream rate of invasive coronary angiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Apr 1;19(4):405-414. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jex068. — View Citation

Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, Daniels DV, Jegere S, Kim HS, Dunning A, DeFrance T, Lansky A, Leipsic J, Min JK. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Nov 1;58(19):1989-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.066. — View Citation

Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, Berman DS, Koo BK, van Mieghem C, Erglis A, Lin FY, Dunning AM, Apruzzese P, Budoff MJ, Cole JH, Jaffer FA, Leon MB, Malpeso J, Mancini GB, Park SJ, Schwartz RS, Shaw LJ, Mauri L. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA. 2012 Sep 26;308(12):1237-45. doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.11274. — View Citation

Norgaard BL, Hjort J, Gaur S, Hansson N, Botker HE, Leipsic J, Mathiassen ON, Grove EL, Pedersen K, Christiansen EH, Kaltoft A, Gormsen LC, Maeng M, Terkelsen CJ, Kristensen SD, Krusell LR, Jensen JM. Clinical Use of Coronary CTA-Derived FFR for Decision-Making in Stable CAD. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 May;10(5):541-550. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.11.025. Epub 2016 Apr 13. — View Citation

Norgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, Seneviratne S, Ko BS, Ito H, Jensen JM, Mauri L, De Bruyne B, Bezerra H, Osawa K, Marwan M, Naber C, Erglis A, Park SJ, Christiansen EH, Kaltoft A, Lassen JF, Botker HE, Achenbach S; NXT Trial Study Group. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 1;63(12):1145-1155. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.043. Epub 2014 Jan 30. — View Citation

Norgaard BL, Terkelsen CJ, Mathiassen ON, Grove EL, Botker HE, Parner E, Leipsic J, Steffensen FH, Riis AH, Pedersen K, Christiansen EH, Maeng M, Krusell LR, Kristensen SD, Eftekhari A, Jakobsen L, Jensen JM. Coronary CT Angiographic and Flow Reserve-Guided Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 30;72(18):2123-2134. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.043. Epub 2018 Aug 25. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Number of Participants With ICA Without Obstructive CAD or Intervention	Number of those patients with planned ICA in whom no significant obstructive CAD (no stenosis=70% by core lab quantitative analysis or invasive FFR=0.8) is found or interventions (including stent implantation, balloon dilation and bypass graft) are performed during ICA within 90 days.	90 days
Secondary	Number of Participant With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event	Major adverse cardiovascular event include death, myocardial infarction (MI), major complications from cardiovascular (CV) procedures or testing, and unstable angina hospitalization	12 months
Secondary	Medical Expenditure	Overall cardiac medical expenditure by intention to treat at both 90 days and 12 months cumulatively	12 months
Secondary	Patient Reporting Outcomes	Patient reporting outcomes as measured by Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7(SAQ-7) Scale, use SAQ-7-item instrument that measures patient reported symptoms, function and quality of life for subjects with CAD within 12 months. The SAQ-7 score is calculated as the average of the physical limitation score, quality of life score and angina frequency score. The physical limitation score, quality of life score and angina frequency score range from 0 to 100 each. Therefore, the SAQ-7 score also ranges from 0 to 100.The higher the SAQ-7 socre, physical limitation score, quality of life score and angina frequency score are, the better the quality of life for patients with angina.	Study entry, 3 months, 6 months and12 months
Secondary	Cumulative Radiation Exposure	Cumulative radiation exposure for any examination within 90 days and 12 months. Due to not enough data acquired, the investigators decided not to report at this time	90 days, 12 months