No-Touch Versus Conventional Saphenous Vein Harvesting Technique

Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Multicenter Randomized Trial to Compare the Graft Patency Between No-Touch Vein Harvesting Technique and Conventional Approach in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: the PATENCY Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03126409
• Other study ID #: 20170414
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: May 14, 2017
• Est. completion date: December 30, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: October 2019
• Source: China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study evaluates the short-term patency of vein graft harvested by the No-Touch technique compared to that by the conventional approach in patients undergoing isolated on-pump/off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. a total of at least 2000 patients undergoing isolated on-pump/off-pump CABG will be consecutively recruited from 7 hospitals across China and randomly assigned to receive No-Touch saphenous vein harvesting or conventional approach. All participants will be invited for clinical follow-up and 64-slice multislice computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) analysis at 3 months post-operatively.

Description:

CABG is still the treatment of choice for ischemic heart disease. However, restenosis or occlusion may occur to graft vessels, leading to postoperative myocardial ischemia and subsequent clinical events. Long-term angiographic follow-up demonstrated that vein graft restenosis and occlusion are common among those receiving CABG, with a vein graft patency of less than 50% at 15 years postoperatively. Besides, it is found that graft occlusion may occur as early as 3 months after the surgery. It is, therefore, a major priority to improve the short-term postoperative vein graft patency so as to achieve better prognosis for patients.

Saphenous vein, the currently most frequently used graft material, occupies over 70% of all graft vessels.

Multiple factors may contribute to the early restenosis or occlusion of the vein grafts, including anastomosis technique, graft vessel quality, target lesion site and degree of stenosis, perioperative coagulating function, etc. The No-Touch technique focuses on saphenous vein graft harvesting, featured by preserving the surrounding tissue of the vein while at the same time avoiding manual distension. This technique has been reported associated with better short and long-term vein graft patency. However, these results mostly came from small-scale, single-center studies, therefore could hardly be recognized as high-level evidence for generalization of the technique.

This prospective multi-center study aims to compare the short-term saphenous vein graft patency harvested by the No-Touch technique and the conventional approach. This study will consecutively enroll 2000 patients undergoing isolated on-pump/off-pump CABG in 7 hospitals of China. After obtaining informed written consent, participants will be randomly allocated to either the No-Touch harvesting or conventional approach group. At baseline, participants will be interviewed to collect detailed information about on demographics, socioeconomic status, cardiovascular risk factors, clinical characteristics, treatments, in-hospital outcomes, general and disease-specific quality of life, function and mental status. During the follow-ups, the investigators will collect information about clinical outcomes events, long-term treatments, function, quality of life, symptoms, and medical care during the recovery period. All participants will be invited for 64-slice multi-slice computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) analysis at 3 months post-operatively for graft patency evaluation.

The patients, data adjudicators and CT reviewers will be blinded to the study. Due to the nature of this study, the operating surgeons, anesthetists and other operative room staff will not be blind in this study.

By comparing the short-term graft patency between the No-Touch and conventional vein harvesting groups, this study will contribute major evidence of the possible superiority of this technique, so as to improve patient outcomes after CABG surgery.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 2655
• Est. completion date: December 30, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: September 30, 2019
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients receiving first time isolated on-pump/off-pump CABG

• Patients with at least one available saphenous vein graft

Exclusion Criteria:

• Need for a concomitant cardiac or vascular surgeries (i.e. valve repair or replacement, Maze surgery)

• Redo-CABG

• Emergent CABG

• Using vascular stapler for anastomosis

• Endarterectomy of coronary artery during surgery

• Left ventricular repair due to ventricular aneurysm

• Combined with malignant tumor or other severe systemic conditions

• Severe renal insufficiency (i.e. creatinine >200 µmol/L)

• Contraindications for dual antiplatelet therapy, such as active gastroduodenal ulcer

• Participants of another ongoing clinical trials

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Coronary Artery Disease
• Coronary Disease
• Myocardial Ischemia

Intervention

Procedure:
• No-Touch vein harvesting technique
The No-Touch technique focuses on saphenous vein graft harvesting, featured by preserving the surrounding tissue of the vein while at the same time avoiding manual distension.
• Conventional vein harvesting
During saphenous vein harvesting, surrounding tissue of the vein is stripped off, and manual distension is routinely performed

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
China	Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academay of Medical Science and National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases	Beijing	Beijing

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (1)

Wang X, Tian M, Zheng Z, Gao H, Wang Y, Wang L, Hu S. Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized trial to compare the graft patency between no-touch vein harvesting technique and conventional approach in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Am Heart J. 2019 Apr;210:75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Dec 6. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Prevalence of graft occlusion	All participants will be invited to return to their operating hospitals for 64-slice multi-slice computed tomography angiography to determine patencies of the graft vessels.	3 month after procedure
Secondary	Prevalence of graft occlusion	All participants will be invited to return to their operating hospitals for 64-slice multi-slice computed tomography angiography to determine patencies of the graft vessels.	1 year after procedure
Secondary	Overall major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) rate	MACCE includes death, myocardial infarction, stroke and/or repeat revascularization	3 month and 1 year after procedure
Secondary	Cardiac death	death from any heart disease	3 month and 1 year after procedure
Secondary	Documented non-lethal myocardial infarction	Myocardial infarction is defined according to the most recent guideline	3 month and 1 year after procedure
Secondary	Stroke	an acute symptomatic episode of focal or global neurological dysfunction caused by brain, spinal, or retinal vascular injury as a result of hemorrhage or infarction	3 month and 1 year after procedure
Secondary	Target lesion revascularization	CABG or percutaneous coronary intervention	3 month and 1 year after procedure
Secondary	Recurrence of Angina	recurrence of unstable angina	3 month and 1 year after procedure