Coronary Artery Disease Clinical Trial
Official title:
Improving Long Term Exercise in Older Cardiac Patients
Using a randomized clinical trial with 3 groups, the investigators will conduct a
head-to-head evaluation of two different theoretically-based interventions, SystemCHANGE and
CHANGE+, as compared to Usual Care to improve the adoption and maintenance of exercise in
older cardiac patients. SystemCHANGE, a novel intervention that focuses on environmental
change uses System Improvement strategies to increase exercise, will be compared to CHANGE+
(an intervention based contemporary cognitive behavioral strategies). Study questions are:
(1) Is there a difference between SystemCHANGE, CHANGE+ and Usual Care in exercise adoption
when controlling for covariates (age, race, functional capacity, body fat, co-morbidity,
muscle or joint pain, exercise experience, home and neighborhood environment, and
depression), for individuals following a cardiac rehabilitation program (CRP)? (2) Is there
a difference between SystemCHANGE, CHANGE+, and Usual Care in exercise maintenance when
controlling for covariates? (3) Do system changes, social support for exercise,
problem-solving skills, motivation, health beliefs, and exercise self-efficacy mediate the
effects of SystemCHANGE, CHANGE+, or Usual Care on exercise adoption? (4) Do system changes,
social support for exercise, problem-solving skills, motivation, health beliefs, and
exercise self-efficacy mediate the effects of SystemCHANGE, CHANGE+ and CHANGE+
interventions in terms of health care spending, labor force participation and earnings, and
household productivity?
Older persons (N=420) recovering from cardiac events will be randomly assigned to the three
groups. Measures of exercise adoption and maintenance (# of metabolic equivalents {METS}
expended, and whether or not a subject remains exercising) will be taken for 1 year after
completion of a CRP using heart rate wristwatch monitors, exercise diaries, and 7-Day Recall
Survey. The effect of covariates also will be assessed. Mechanisms by which the
interventions achieve their effects will be determined. Multivariate analyses will examine
and compare the effects of the interventions over time. A cost-effectiveness analysis also
will be conducted.
Assisting individuals to adopt and maintain lifestyle exercise after a cardiac event remains
challenging. The purpose of this 3-group, randomized controlled trial was to test two
theoretically distinct behavior change interventions against a usual care (UC) group to
increase lifestyle exercise after a cardiac event. In a new intervention, SystemCHANGE (SC),
based on process improvement and ecological theories, participants were taught to use a
series of small self-designed experiments to change their daily routines associated with
exercise. The emphasis was on changing systems in their lives rather than relying on
motivation or memory. The second intervention, CHANGE+ (C+), based on cognitive behavioral
theory, included contemporary approaches to increase self-efficacy, motivation, and
problem-solving skills.
Sample
The sample consisted of a convenience sample of 379 individuals who were consecutively
recruited from five Phase II cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRP) in the greater Cleveland,
Ohio area. Forty percent of the participants approached agreed to participate and were
randomized. Of the 406 subjects consented, 379 completed the study. Subjects were randomly
assigned to one of three study arms: SystemCHANGE (process improvement model program of
health behavior change), CHANGE+ (cognitive behavioral model program of health behavior
change), or Usual Care. All subjects had a recent cardiac event (myocardial infarction,
coronary artery bypass surgery and/or percutaneous coronary intervention) and were
participating in a Phase II cardiac rehabilitation program. Subjects were recruited near the
end of their program and followed for one year after cardiac rehabilitation. Subjects were
included if they were greater than 55 years of age and able to read and speak English; they
were excluded if they met criteria for being at high risk for safe exercise participation
following a cardiac event (ejection fraction < 30%, decrease in systolic blood pressure of >
15 mmHg with exercise, serious arrhythmias at rest or exercise induced, and exercise induced
ischemia indicated by angina > 2 mm ST segment depression on the electrocardiogram).
Intervention Protocols
Both the CHANGE+ and SystemCHANGE interventions consist of a series of five small-group (six
to eight people) education sessions provided in three 1.5-hour sessions once a week during
the last three weeks of the CRP and in two sessions held at one and two months following
completion of their CRP. An experienced cardiac nurse or exercise physiologist trained in
the intervention protocol taught each of the sessions. In a series of structured activities,
participants were taught to use behavior change strategies consistent with the respective
intervention models. A series of three monthly booster calls were made during months four,
five and six following the last intervention class and individuals were coached in the use
of strategies consistent with the respective interventions. Usual Care consisted of only the
routine care provided at the CRP. All participants received the usual CRP prescribed
structured exercise and individual and group classes (four) on diet modification and stress
reduction that are part of routine care at the CRPs. At the end of the CRP, all individuals
were given an exercise prescription that included their target heart rate and counseled to
exercise at least five times a week for 30 minutes.
Measures
Three dimensions of exercise were measured: frequency, amount, and maintenance. Exercise
frequency was the number of sessions exercised (of at least 10 minutes duration) over a
given period of time. Exercise amount was the number of hours exercised and reflected both
the frequency and the duration of each exercise session. Exercise was measured using
portable wristwatch heart rate monitors (Polar RS400) and exercise diaries. Data from the
monitors was used as the primary data source with diary data used as backup if data from the
monitor were not available (i.e., forgot to put on the monitor, monitor malfunction). The
heart rate (HR) monitor memory was programmed to record HR at 5-second intervals during an
exercise session. Standardized, validated measures were also obtained at baseline, two, six,
and twelve months of: system changes, social support for exercise, problem-solving skills,
motivation, health beliefs, and exercise self-efficacy. Measures were also obtained on
possible moderating and confounding variables: age, race, functional capacity, body fat,
co-morbidity, muscle or joint pain, exercise experience, home and neighborhood environment,
and depression.
Procedures
Individuals who met study inclusion criteria were enrolled during the sixth to eighth week
of the CRP and written informed consent was obtained. Baseline measures were obtained in a
private interview at the CRP center. The intervention began week ten of the subjects' CRP.
At the end of their CRP, subjects were given HR monitors and exercise diaries and were
directed to return mail them during each of the next twelve months. The number of hours
exercised during exercise adoption (months one through three) and maintenance (months four
through twelve) was calculated. Multiple linear regression was used to determine if study
group membership predicted exercise adoption and maintenance. Mediation analysis was also
conducted.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT06030596 -
SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
|
||
| Completed |
NCT04080700 -
Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT03810599 -
Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06002932 -
Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT06032572 -
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE)
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05308719 -
Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04242134 -
Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04556994 -
Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients.
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05846893 -
Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06027788 -
CTSN Embolic Protection Trial
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05023629 -
STunning After Balloon Occlusion
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04941560 -
Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
|
||
| Completed |
NCT04006288 -
Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT01860274 -
Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06174090 -
The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT03959072 -
Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
|
||
| Completed |
NCT03968809 -
Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05065073 -
Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography
|
Phase 4 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04566497 -
Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up.
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05096442 -
Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Korean Patients With Coronary De Novo Lesions
|
N/A |