View clinical trials related to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Filter by:The KOrea COpd Subgroup Study team (KOCOSS) cohort is an ongoing, longitudinal, prospective, non-interventional and observational study within the Korean COPD patients. The prevalence of early COPD (mild to moderate COPD based by 2011 GOLD(the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) guideline) is high in Korea. However, the patients with early COPD are not underdiagnosed due to mild symptom. The purpose of this study is to investigate early COPD characteristics and disease course and to form a guideline for early detection of COPD patients and prevention of progression to severe COPD.
Detecting exacerbations to prevent a severe and / or to early treat an exacerbation is crucial in patients with COPD in order to prevent hospitalization. Patients with invasive mechanical ventilation outside the hospital have a high re-hospitalization rate which is associated with severe economic burden since those patients need to be treated mainly on an ICU or a respiratory ward being able to take care of invasive mechanical ventilation. Recently, it has been shown that daily variations of parameters recorded by non-invasive ventilation (NIV) software are predictors of exacerbations in a cohort of COPD patients being treated outside the hospital with NIV [1]. These parameters were respiratory rate and percentage of respiratory cycles triggered by the patient. The aim of the present study is to detect parameters recorded by the ventilator which are able to predict exacerbation and / or hospitalization in patients with COPD under invasive mechanical ventilation outside the hospital.
To study activity in the reward-circuitry of the brain in patients suffering from cachexia induced by cancer or chronic disease.
The continuously increasing prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, type-2 diabetes, and COPD is a major health problem in developed countries and is mainly caused by an unhealthy lifestyle. Most important lifestyle related causes of morbidity and mortality are smoking, obesity and physical inactivity, and increasing rates of obesity and physical inactivity in combination with smoking will lead to an increase in the number of patients with lifestyle related diseases in the coming decades. There is, therefore, an urgent need to identify and establish strategies and to implement interventions, allowing for the identification and management of citizens at increased risk of disease. Two recent systematic reviews of general practice based health checks suggest that people at increased risk of a chronic disease may benefit from a targeted approach to health checks. Targeted or selective preventive actions are a generally accepted and well integrated part of the health care system (e.g. treatment of hypertension and hyperlipidemia). However, selective prevention is challenged in terms of how to identify citizens at increased risk of disease in the general population in order to start the indicated preventive actions. The aim of the present pilot study is to test the acceptability, feasibility and short-term effect of a selective preventive program that systematically helps citizens evaluate individual risk of lifestyle related disease and offers targeted and coordinated preventive services in the primary health care sector. The intervention comprises four elements: 1) Systematic collection of information on lifestyle risk factors using questionnaire 2) Risk estimation and stratification into risk groups based on questionnaire data and information from the electronic patient record (EPR) using validated risk estimation models, 3) An individual electronic health profile with personalized advise on lifestyle change and 4) targeted preventive services at the general practitioner (GP) or the municipality for citizens at risk of lifestyle disease and citizens with risk behavior, respectively. The intervention is supported by a patient-centered health information system that facilitates informed patient action and integrates general practice and municipality health care providers.
This is a multiple dose, randomized, parallel, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter and multinational Phase III study to determine the efficacy and safety of Aclidinium bromide 400μg/Formoterol Fumarate (AB/FF) 12 μg compared to individual components and TIO (Tiotropium) 18 μg when administered to patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
To assess the bronchodilation of three doses of formoterol fumarate (6 μg, 12 μg and 24 μg) twice daily (BID) administered via Pressair® compared to placebo and to open-label nebulized formoterol fumarate (20 μg and 40 μg).
The purpose of this study is to determine wether the interface (facial or nasal mask) influences performance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exercising with non-invasive ventilation.
This is an open-label single-center 6-month prospective clinical trial predicting exacerbation of COPD with wireless telemonitoring of respiratory rate, heart rate and sleep in patients admitted to the pulmonary ward of the Turku University Hospital due to acute exacerbation of COPD.
The aim of this study to investigate the efficacy of a home-base exercise program with a new conical PEP device on physical performance and health related quality of life in COPD patients.
The aim of Patient-Centred Innovations for Persons With Multimorbidity (PACE in MM) study is to reorient the health care system from a single disease focus to a multimorbidity focus; centre on not only disease but also the patient in context; and realign the health care system from separate silos to coordinated collaborations in care. PACE in MM will propose multifaceted innovations in Chronic Disease Prevention and Management (CDPM) that will be grounded in current realities (i.e. Chronic Care Models including Self-Management Programs), that are linked to Primary Care (PC) reform efforts. The study will build on this firm foundation, will design and test promising innovations and will achieve transformation by creating structures to sustain relationships among researchers, decision-makers, practitioners, and patients. The Team will conduct inter-jurisdictional comparisons and is mainly a Quebec (QC) - Ontario (ON) collaboration with participation from 3 other provinces: British Columbia (BC); Manitoba (MB); and Nova Scotia (NS). The Team's objectives are: 1) to identify factors responsible for success or failure of current CDPM programs linked to the PC reform, by conducting a realist synthesis of their quantitative and qualitative evaluations; 2) to transform consenting CDPM programs identified in Objective 1, by aligning them to promising interventions on patient-centred care for multimorbidity patients, and to test these new innovations' in at least two jurisdictions and compare among jurisdictions; and 3) to foster the scaling-up of innovations informed by Objective 1 and tested/proven in Objective 2, and to conduct research on different approaches to scaling-up. This registration for Clinical Trials only pertains to Objective 2 of the study.