View clinical trials related to Constriction, Pathologic.
Filter by:The primary objective of this double-blind study is to compare the frequency of primary patency at 6 months in patients with stenosis of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) treated either by conventional angioplasty + angioplasty with balloon impregnated with paclitaxel or by conventional angioplasty + angioplasty with placebo balloon (balloon not impregnated with paclitaxel). The other objectives of the study are: 1. To compare the frequency of primary patency at 3 months and 12 months. 2. To compare the rate of restenosis > 50% at the site of angioplasty at 3, 6 and 12 months. 3. To compare, at 3, 6 and 12 months, the proportion of patients with arteriovenous fistula deteriorating back to preoperative flow rate (within 20% of preoperative flow rate). 4. To compare, at 3, 6 and 12 months, the proportion of AVF with a flow rate < 500 ml / min. 5. To compare, at 3, 6 and 12 months, the cumulative rate of thrombosis. 6. To compare, at 3, 6 and 12 months, the medical costs related to direct medical care, initial treatments, monitoring, diagnosis and treatments of complications.
Esophageal stents are commonly used for benign esophageal pathology, especially strictures or esophageal mucosal defects such as leaks, fistulae, or perforations. The major limiting factor to stent placement is the high migration rate of the stent. Investigators are trying to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of endostitch in preventing stent migration in benign esophageal disease in comparison with standard, fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) placement without fixation.
BACKGROUND.- The frailty syndrome (FS) associates an increase in morbidity and mortality in the elderly patient. When severe and symptomatic, aortic stenosis (AS) is a disease with poor prognosis, the most frequent cause of heart surgery in the elderly and associates high health costs. No variables have been identified as determinants of morbidity and mortality of these patients and there are not algorithms developed for treatment decision-making in this particular population. The FS as a functional reserve indicator could be a prognostic and interventional treatment tolerance marker, and should be included in the selection of patients for surgical treatment. The FS and cardiovascular disease (CVD) share biological substrates among which an inflammatory state associates poor prognosis. OBJECTIVES .- To evaluate the effectiveness of the diagnosis of FS to characterize the prognosis of elderly patients with severe symptomatic AS representative of clinical practice. In addition, to examine the contribution of an inflammatory state to the relationship of FS with the prognosis of severe, symptomatic AS. METHODS .- Prospective study during 12 months of 200 patients > 74 years old with severe symptomatic AS. During the index visit the main clinical characteristics will be recorded and in addition we will perform a comprehensive geriatric assessment, FS assessmet according to Fried et al criteria (strength, walking speed, physical activity, fatigue, unintentional weight loss) and determination of inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein and interleukin-6). During follow-up, measures of functional impairment (basic and instrumental activities of daily living, walking speed and timed set up & go test), hospitalizations, death and quality of life will be determined.
This study aims to evaluate whether baseline 18F-sodium fluoride uptake activity at aortic valve could predict aortic stenosis progression in moderate aortic stenosis. Patients with moderate aortic stenosis are enrolled and underwent baseline evaluation including 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT. After 1 year, all the participants underwent follow-up echocardiography. The study design is an observational trial. Primary endpoint was a change in mean pressure gradient along the aortic valve as assessed by echocardiography at 1 year. Secondary endpoints include changes in aortic valve area, and symptom occurrence.
There have been few published studies that examine the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatments on patients with pulsatile tinnitus with venous stenosis. Despite the limited experience with venous sinus stenting to treat pulsatile tinnitus, preliminary results show that venous sinus stenting could represent a viable alternative for refractory pulsatile tinnitus patients with venous sinus stenosis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this procedure in a controlled fashion, using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, and long-term clinical and imaging follow-up. The investigators hope to provide robust data regarding the safety and efficacy of venous sinus stenting for patients with pulsatile tinnitus.
To collect information about treatment for severe aortic stenosis (AS), which affects the aortic valve in the heart. Aortic stenosis is a narrowing of the aortic valve opening, which decreases blood flow from the heart and causes symptoms such as chest pain, fainting and shortness of breath. The preferred treatment for severe aortic stenosis is aortic valve replacement surgery.
Investigators sought to demonstrate that the increase in the stroke volume during a dobutamine stress echocardiography might impact the prognosis of a patient addressed for a low flow low gradient suspected severe aortic valve stenosis.
To assess the safety and efficacy of the BARD LTX DCB for treatment of stenosis or occlusion of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries.
Williams syndrome is a rare genetic disorder occurring in 1:8000-12,000 individuals. It is caused by the deletion of 25-27 coding genes, including elastin (ELN) on the 7th human chromosome. Haploinsufficiency for these genes leads to the features of the condition, including: - Distinctive facial features; - Characteristic vascular problems including hypertension, focal vascular stenosis, (when present in the aorta this is referred to as SVAS), vascular stiffness and differences in heart rate variability; - Endocrine abnormalities including hypercalcemia, hypothyroidism, and early puberty; - Metabolic concerns with colic and failure to gain weight in infancy and obesity and early glucose intolerance in adulthood; - Characteristic neurocognitive profile comprised of cognitive impairment, high sociality with concurrent social awkwardness, difficulty with visual-spatial tasks, relative strengths in speech, and lack of social fear; - Anxiety and chronic pain in adulthood Most individuals with WS carry the same basic deletion on Chromosome 7q11.23. However, each feature may present as mild or more severe in any given individual. Variation in the presence and severity of these vascular phenotypes remains unexplained. The supravalvar aortic stenosis (SVAS) phenotype is caused by haploinsufficiency for elastin. This can come about due to the WS deletion (as above) or due to heterozygous variation in elastin (ELN) gene itself in this region. When this protein is reduced, connective tissues lose its strength, flexibility, and overall support. When this happens in the aorta, it may cause vascular narrowing that presents as shortness of breath, chest pain, and even heart failure if left untreated. Narrowing also occurs in other vessels especially the pulmonary and renal arteries. Changes in non-vascular elastic tissues such as the skin and lungs also occur. As in WBS, phenotypic variation also occurs in people with ELN gene changes--This variability remains unexplained despite all the on-going research. Most individuals with features of SVAS have either WS or an elastin variant. There are, however, a smaller number of individuals with the phenotypic features of the condition whose genetic underpinnings are yet to be defined (they are referred to as SVAS-like). Additionally, there are 26 other coding genes within the WS critical region that contribute to various other features of the condition Objective: 1. To collect historical information and to bank DNA, cells, and tissue from individuals with genetic alterations in the WS/ELN gene region, those with an SVAS -like phenotype and unaffected family members/controls to facilitate future research into the many phenotypes seen in these individuals. 2. Currently, we plan to use the collected samples to identify genetic and environmental factors that contribute to the variability in different phenotypes (vascular and non-vascular) in individuals with WS, SVAS and SVAS-like conditions, individuals with variation in WS genes other than elastin and unaffected family members and controls. For the non-vascular features of WS and SVAS-like conditions for which a specific gene has not been implicated in the disease, we would also like to identify causative genes as well as modifiers. Likewise, by evaluating people with variation in other WS region genes, we can determine what contribution those genes make to the studied phenotypes. Controls will be both used to assess the frequency of genetic features in people without the phenotype in question and to evaluate heritability, penetrance, and expressivity of relevant variants. Eligibility: People ages 0-85 with either WS, SVAS, and/or an SVAS-like condition, unaffected family members or adult unrelated controls. Design: This study is not a treatment protocol. This study will consist of: Collection of personal history (questionnaires) and medical record data (relevant physician notes, lab and diagnostic tests and studies) to study the natural history of these conditions, allow stratification of disease severity, and identification of environmental risk factors; Collection of blood, saliva, urine and surgical tissue waste to allow DNA and RNA preparation as well as study of tissues both in situ and through the generation of IPSCs; Expression studies on available tissues (lymphocytes, IPSCs, vascular, skin, other collected tissues) to look for differential regulation of target genes; Direct imaging of tissues (lymphocytes, IPSCs, vascular, skin, other collected tissues); Storage of collected data and specimens for future research; A questionnaire may be sent to participants or parent/guardian or LAR to respond on behalf of participant.
This study is safety and proof-of-concept study for oral prednisolone in the treatment of esophageal stricture after esophageal surgery. The patients who develop the severe esophageal strictures from 28 days after esophageal surgery are included. Primary outcomes are Safety and Success rate of this treatment.