Clinical Trials Logo

Colorectal Cancer clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Colorectal Cancer.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT02066064 Completed - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

G-Eye Advanced Colonoscopy For Increased Polyp Detection Rate-randomized Tandem Study With Different Endoscopist

Start date: November 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare the adenoma detection rate of G-EYE™ high definition colonoscopy with that of standard high definition colonoscopy.

NCT ID: NCT02062749 Completed - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

Escalating Doses of Oxaliplatin and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Children and Adolescents With Extensive Colon Carcinoma

Start date: May 19, 2014
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

The goal of this clinical research study is to find the highest tolerated dose of heated intra-abdominal oxaliplatin that can be given to patients with colon cancer. Researchers also want to learn more about the ways that pediatric and young adult colon cancer may be different from colon cancer in adults.

NCT ID: NCT02056691 Completed - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

EDICT - Exercise inDuced Changes In Colorectal Cancer Tissues

EDICT
Start date: October 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This pilot study looks to explore the biological effects of exercise on cancer and muscle cells using a two week exercise program (HIThigh intensity training) on 20 patients with newly diagnosed and operable colorectal cancer following diagnosis and prior to surgery. Maximal oxygen uptake will also be measured. The aim of this pilot is to assess the feasibility of recruiting participants to and carrying out a two week preoperative exercise program in patients with colorectal cancer.

NCT ID: NCT02054923 Completed - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

The Effect of Routine Video-recording on Colonoscopy Quality Indicators.

Start date: March 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Routine video recording of the colonoscopy examination has been proposed as a simple and easy to implement method that could improve the quality of colonoscopy. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether implementation of routine video recording of screening colonoscopy withdrawal is effective as a means of supporting quality performance of colonoscopy. The study will be performed in 8 screening centers within the framework of a national colonoscopy screening program in Poland (the Polish Colonoscopy Screening Platform; PCSP). Individuals aged 55-64 years are eligible to participate in the PCSP. In the run-in period colonoscopy quality measures will be monitored through a dedicated joint database. Then eligible screening centres will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the video recording group or the control group. Screening centres assigned to the video recording group will receive videorecorders and DVDs and will be asked to video record all screening colonoscopies (only withdrawal). Control group will be allowed to record colonoscopies on demand only. Then , the colonoscopy quality measures will again be monitored through a dedicated joint database. All the recorded DVDs will be reviewed to verify ceacal intubation and withdrawal time by the PCSP team.

NCT ID: NCT02054598 Completed - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

Improving Colon Cancer Screening for Diverse Populations

Start date: January 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study is a multi-site randomized, controlled trial testing the effect of a combined intervention that includes a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening decision aid plus patient navigation in a diverse, primary care patient population in clinical sites in North Carolina and New Mexico. Our primary aim is to determine the effect of the intervention on CRC screening completion six months after the index visit among all enrolled participants and among Latinos. Secondarily, we will determine how this intervention affects screening-related knowledge, self-efficacy, intent, and clinical communication, and examine whether these factors mediate the effect of the intervention on screening test completion. Lastly, we will explore whether insurance status, ethnicity, and patient language preference moderate the effect of the intervention on screening.

NCT ID: NCT02052050 Completed - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

Core Stability Program in Colorectal Cancer Survivors

Start date: September 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of physical training program to improve deep stabilizer muscle in colorectal cancer survivors

NCT ID: NCT02050737 Terminated - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

Plasma Biomarkers C-RAC, ICORG 12-27, V1

Start date: October 2013
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This is an exploratory, translational, non-interventional and multi-centre clinical study.

NCT ID: NCT02045680 Unknown status - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

RADOX' Reduced Abdominal Distension and Oxygen Delivery

RADOX
Start date: March 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The use of laparoscopic surgery is continuing to increase in colorectal resection and expected reach 80% in the next 10 years. Although laparoscopic (keyhole) or minimally invasive surgery can lead to faster recovery it can also put significant stresses on the patient's heart and cause fluctuations in blood pressure due to the extreme headdown positioning and abdominal insufflation of carbon dioxide gas. We have performed several surgical cases under deep neuromuscular block and this has allowed surgery to operate at lower abdominal pressures (from 14 down to 8 mmHg). This put less strain on the heart and allowed higher cardiac outputs. This study will look at whether deep neuromuscular block is beneficial for patients by 1. Increasing oxygen delivery, measured using oesophageal doppler monitoring of cardiovascular variables intraoperatively 2. Allowing surgery at lower abdominal insufflation pressures if they have a deep block 3. Reducing patient's analgesic requirements postoperatively in recovery and at 4 hours

NCT ID: NCT02041507 Active, not recruiting - Pain Clinical Trials

Water-aided Colonoscopy vs Air Insufflation Colonoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening

Start date: February 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The degree of protection afforded by colonoscopy against proximal colorectal cancer (CRC) appears to be related to the quality of the procedure, and the incomplete removal of lesions has been shown to increase the subsequent risk of developing a colon cancer. Some studies suggest that small polyps with advanced histology are more common in the right than in the left colon (right colon proximal to splenic flexure, left colon distal to the splenic flexure). The average size of polyps in the right colon with advanced pathology or containing adenocarcinoma was ≤9 mm, whereas in the left colon their average size was >9 mm, P<0.001. Inadequate prevention of right-sided CRC incidence and mortality may be due to right-sided polyps with advanced histology or that harbor malignancy. These presumptive precursors of cancer are smaller and possibly more easily obscured by residual feces, and more likely to be missed at colonoscopy. Water-aided colonoscopy (WAC) can be subdivided broadly into two major categories: water immersion (WI), characterized by suction removal of the infused water predominantly during the withdrawal phase of colonoscopy, and water exchange (WE), characterized by suction removal of infused water predominantly during the insertion phase of colonoscopy. In some reports WE appeared to be superior to both WI and air insufflation colonoscopy (AI) in terms of pain reduction and adenoma detection, particularly for <10 mm adenomas in the proximal colon. In this multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) we test the hypothesis that that WE, compared to AI and WI, will enhance overall Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) in CRC screening patients. Confirmation of the primary hypothesis will provide evidence that WE enhances the quality of screening colonoscopy. We also hypothesize that WE may be more effective in detecting proximal colon adenomas than WI and AI, particularly <10 mm adenomas, thus increasing proximal colon ADR and proximal colon ADR <10 mm. Confirmation of secondary hypotheses will provide justification for further testing that WE may provide a strategy to improve prevention of colorectal cancer by increasing detection of adenomas in screening colonoscopy. Unlike previous reports of single colonoscopist studies, the insertion and withdrawal phases of colonoscopy will be done by different investigators. The second investigator will be blinded to the method used to insert the instrument, thus eliminating possible bias about procedure related issues. Several secondary outcomes will also be analysed.

NCT ID: NCT02040142 Completed - Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trials

Single Arm Study Treating Patients of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy (Colorectal, Appendical, Pseudomyxoma, Gastric) With Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Mitomycin-C

Start date: November 2011
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This is a clinical study investigating the new treatment of surgery combined with intraperitoneal mitomycin-C for patients with gastrointestinal cancer that has spread to the peritoneal (abdominal cavity) surface. Mitomycin-C to be used in this procedure is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)for many different cancers including gastrointestinal cancer. Giving mitomycin C via the intraperitoneal route is not FDA approved and is an investigation therapy. Cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal chemotherapy can be offered as standard of care outside of a clinical trial. However, since this is an unproven and potentially more effective but a more toxic approach, the investigators are performing this procedure under an IRB approved clinical trial in order to better evaluate the risks and benefits of this approach. A standardized, evidence-based approach is currently lacking for patients with peritoneal surface malignancy from gastrointestinal origin. A clinical trial with surgical quality assurance and modern hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy incorporating critical assessment of disease burden, determinants of complete cytoreduction, treatment-related toxicity, quality of life and survival is imperative. Theoretically, cytoreductive surgery is performed to treat macroscopic disease, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is used to treat microscopic residual disease with the objective of removing disease completely in a single procedure.