View clinical trials related to Colorectal Cancer.
Filter by:The overall goal of this study is to develop a platform for both large-scale chemoprevention trials and real-world chemoprevention studies for colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention. The specific objectives of this proof of concept study are to: 1. Evaluate the feasibility of a real-world chemoprevention agent (CPA) intervention (3-months of daily low-dose acetylsalicylic (ASA)) in participants at increased risk for CRC (one or more high-risk adenomas removed during colonoscopy) based on participant uptake, adherence (days taking CPA), and adverse events; 2. Evaluate factors related to uptake and adherence of ASA using validated surveys and interviews.
Detection of Colorectal and Pancreatic Cancers Using Breath Analysis - Feasibility Study
A first-in-human study to evaluate the safety, tolerability and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of BPI-442096, a SHP2 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Establishment and validation of the deep learning signature of bevacizumab efficacy in initially unresectable CRLM patients
This is an open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 randomized trial which randomizes patients with isolated resectable colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases to receive preoperative systematic therapy followed by CRS+HIPEC and postoperative chemotherapy or upfront CRS+HIPEC followed by postoperative chemotherapy.
This is a prospective, open-labelled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequetial transarterial chemoembolization with lipiodol and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of initial unresectable colorectal cancer. The progression-free-survival (PFS) will be evaluated as the primary endpoints.
Quantitative faecal immunochemical testing (qFIT) is used to test for blood within faeces that cannot always be visible. The presence of blood in the stool has been shown to be a finding where there may be a problem within the large bowel. The test is able to give a numeric value to the blood in the stool and based on this result, further investigations can be planned, or if normal reassurance given. The test is not perfect and minor bowel problems such as haemorrhoids (piles) can give a raised result. However, we have also seen raised results in people who when investigated have a completely normal large bowel. A small degree of 'physiological' non-visible bleeding is likely a normal part of life and for the majority this does not lead to a raised qFIT result. It may be the case in people who have a raised qFIT but then go on to have a completely normal colonoscopy (telescope investigation of the large bowel) that there is a genetic predisposition that increases the amount of normal 'physiological blood' that they produce. This leads to the test being falsely positive and the person undergoing an unnecessary investigation. This study aims to use saliva to test for known genetic markers that effect blood clotting and can increase how much someone bleeds. By comparing the occurrence of these genetic markers in people with a raised qFIT and normal colonoscopy to those with a normal qFIT and normal colonoscopy, we can test this theory. Should this be the case it will help explain why the test can be raised in normal large bowel and could lead to different levels of positivity being used for different people.
This is a first-in-human multi-center study which will be conducted in advanced malignant solid tumors patients. The solid tumor type is limited to melanoma, colorectal, non-small-cell lung, and thyroid cancer with positive BRAF V600 mutation. This study is divided into three stages: Phase Ia: a dose-escalation phase of XP-102; Phase Ib: a dose-escalation and sample size expansion phase of XP-102 plus trametinib; Phase IIa: an expansion phase of XP-102 plus trametinib.
This study is a retrospective, multicenter clinical study. The main objective is to analyze the risk factors affecting the recurrence of colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases who received radiofrequency/microwave ablation. Finally, we will construct a recurrence risk prediction model based on the risk factors and validated the model.
Delayed bleeding is the most frequent (5 to 15%) and challenging complication after large colorectal polypectomy. Different preventive treatments, such as the prophylactic use of clips, have been tried to prevent the occurrence of delayed bleeding, but to date, no treatment has clearly shown its effectiveness. In addition, preventive hemostasis with clips is difficult and costly. A newly developed endoscopic hemostatic powder generating gelation effect (Nexpowder) may be an effective alternative to prevent post polypectomy bleeding in patients treated by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large superficial colorectal lesions.