View clinical trials related to Chemotherapy Effect.
Filter by:To explore the intervention effect of auricular point sticking on chemotherapy-induced taste alterations in cancer patients, and analyze its relationship with quality of life, nutritional status and psychology of patients.
Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), also known as "chemobrain," is the cognitive decline that negatively impacts the majority of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, radiation, and/or hormonal treatments. This application focuses on evaluating if using a cognitive mobile training application can decrease the impact of CRCI in gynecologic oncology patients through a multidisciplinary approach with patients undergoing assessments by our neurocognitive team.
The primary objective is to demonstrate superiority of neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by repeat local treatment as compared to upfront repeat local treatment in patients with at least one locally treatable recurrent CRLM in the absence of extrahepatic disease.
Chemotherapy is a cancer therapy performed on advanced cancer with quite good success, but this therapy has quite a lot of side effects. Chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting or commonly known as CINV, is a condition of nausea and vomiting experienced by cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, with a prevalence of around 80% of all patients undergoing chemotherapy, and 40% has the potential to become severe. This study aims to determine the efficacy of a new acupuncture modality, namely the press needle, in preventing CINV symptoms in pediatric patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. The study was conducted using a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) design in 64 pediatric cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy who were randomized into 2 groups, namely: (1) standard medical therapy as the control group; and (2) a combination of standard therapy with press needle acupuncture as the treatment group. The ear acupuncture points used are Shenmen and Stomach, and one body acupuncture point is PC6. Outcome measurements were carried out in the form of the RINVR questionnaire to assess the intensity of nausea and vomiting measured at 4 times: (1) 3 days before chemotherapy; (2) days of chemotherapy; (3) 12 hours after chemotherapy; (4) 3 days after chemotherapy.
With this prospective, observational study, we would like to investigate the effect of instillation therapy using BCG or mitomycin C on short- and long-term irritative and obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms using validated questionnaires. The study will objectify the lower urinary tract symptoms and thereby provide better recommendations for therapy with mitomycin C or BCG.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare in resectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients.The main question it aims to answer is whether the 3-year progression-free survival rate (PFS) of "watching and waiting" is non-inferior to adjuvant chemotherapy in postoperative ctDNA-negative resectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients.Participants will undergo ctDNA testing after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis, and will be randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy or "watching and waiting" treatment strategy. The researchers will compare the outcomes between the two groups to see if the PFS between the two groups is similar.
The goal of this single arm clinical trial is to learn about sequential S-1 adjuvant therapy in patient wich locally advanced gastric cancer. The main question it aims to answer is: • The efficacy and safety of S-1 adjuvant therapy, following D2 radical surgery and DS(Docetaxel + S-1) adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients with locally advanced gastric cancer will received D2 radical surgery, 6 cycles of DS chemotherapy, and sequential S-1 chemotherapy up to 1 year postoperation.
The goal of this clinical trial] is to compare in resectable stage T3-4N2 colorectal cancer. The main question it aims to answer is: whether the use of targeted therapy in combination with adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS) compared to adjuvant chemotherapy alone.
Caloric intake is a determining factor in patients with hematological malignancies and hospitalized for prolonged aplasia following chemotherapy. The nutritional supplement is administered either parenterally or enterally through the placement of a nasogastric sonde (NGS). This last option has shown its advantage compared to parenteral nutrition in terms of preventing infections, the incidence of graft-versus-host disease in allograft patients, and the quality of resumption of oral nutrition during of returning home. NGS allows the administration of an intake of 2000 calories/day, deemed necessary to mitigate the risk of undernutrition in patients hospitalized for more than 3 weeks and in the majority of cases unable to eat enough food mainly due to chemotherapy-induced mucositis. . The choice between enteral feeding by NGS and parenteral nutrition is the subject of controversial studies, with each team choosing one of the two options. The installation of the NGS is often recognized as a traumatic gesture for patients but also invasive by caregivers. The patient's anxiety, the intrusive and traumatic nature of the NGS can sometimes result in a failure of the gesture, a secondary refusal of the patient, or a reluctance of the caregiver to proceed with the gesture. Since 2013, NGS have been placed with the assistance of the nurse who practices hypnosis in the hematology department of the Rennes University Hospital. This invites the patient to pose his SNG without local anesthesia and in a completely autonomous way. The patient is thus able to place the NGS again if necessary during his hospitalization, and during subsequent hospitalizations. A retrospective and monocentric study carried out at the University Hospital of Rennes in 38 patients showed that all were able to perform NGS independently thanks to the hypnotic approach. It was observed a real comfort for the patient, and moreover this technique did not add extra work for the staff. The patient becomes autonomous and actor of his care.
This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) is designed to provide high level evidence describing the non-inferiority of radical cystectomy (RC) alone versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) plus RC on survival outcomes of patients with a diagnostic transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBt) of non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) (T2-T4 N0 M0) and non-radiologic or endoscopic residual tumor after a maximal TURBt (cT0). Our hypothesis is that performing NAC in the absence of residual disease, after a maximal TURBt, has no survival benefit over performing an early cystectomy. Since no downstaging could be achieved in patients with no residual tumor into the bladder, the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in this setting could be not significant and it might turn into unnecessary toxicity and a substantial delay to surgical treatment.