View clinical trials related to Cardiogenic Shock.
Filter by:The study aims to investigate clinically and prognostically relevant parameters in patients with cardiogenic shock within a monocentric observational clinical register.
This study is a prospective, open-label, two-arm, randomized multicenter trial to identify whether immediate multi-vessel PCI would be better in clinical outcomes compared with culprit lesion-only PCI for AMI and multi-vessel disease with an advanced form of CS patients who require veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA-ECMO).
The purpose of this study is to assess whether hemodynamic support with an Impella-based treatment strategy initiated prior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)-Cardiogenic Shock (CS) improves survival and functional outcomes compared to a non-Impella-based treatment strategy.
The primary objective of the PACCS trial is to assess if early invasive hemodynamic assessment and ongoing management with a PAC in patients with cardiogenic shock due to acutely decompensated heart failure (AHDF-CS) is associated with lower in-hospital mortality risk compared to the current standard of care with no or delayed PAC assessment.
LSCSI is a Hub&Spoke project with the main aim to improve the outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock in Lower Silesia region, Poland. It consists of one "hub" which is Wroclaw University Hospital and eleven "spokes" which are eleven cardiology departments situated in Lower Silesian Voivodeship. The consortium have unified protocol defining which cardiogenic shock patient and when should be transferred to the "hub" for enhanced treatment options including durable mechanical circulatory support or heart transplant. The "hub" have 7/24 Shock Team on-site supplied with a protocol how to proceed with "spoke" transferred patients including decision making on which mechanical circulatory support implant with subsequent de-escalation or escalation pathway.
A Clinical Events Committee (CEC) will include Cardiac Surgery Professor and chief of cardiac surgery Rose Kelly MD, Professor of Medicine Ganesh Raveendran MD at the University of Minnesota who is the direction of Interventional Cardiology and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota David Benditt. They will review and adjudicate serious and unexpected adverse events independently from the PI and co investigators.
In the case of cardiogenic shock, the early mortality rate is the highest compared to other types of shock, but it is characterized by a good prognosis and quality of life after recovery, so monitoring the treatment progress is very important to identify the patient's prognosis. However, there are few studies specifically reported on hemodynamic monitoring and prognosis of cardiogenic shock. In addition, as mechanical circulatory support devices are in the spotlight, studies on their effects and safety are starting, but studies on cardiogenic shock are often limited to patients with myocardial infarction. This study is a prospective and retrospective cohort observational study, we aim to identify factors that can improve prognosis, including various drug treatments, diagnostic techniques, and mechanical circulatory support device by investigating the treatment status and clinical outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock hospitalized in cardiovascular critical care unit. In addition, the purpose of this study is to investigate the association between the prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock and the presence of a specialist resident during regular work hours to clarify the role and necessity of a resident specialist in the cardiovascular intensive care unit. Furthermore, by predicting and treating the clinical course of patients with cardiogenic shock at an early stage, the aim is to reduce the mortality rate and improve the patients' ability to perform daily activities.
The ULYSS study is a randomized, multicenter, interventional and prospective open-label clinical trial. It aims to evaluate the efficacy of the addition of an early IMPELLA CP support on top of optimal medical therapy and culprit lesion PCI compared to optimal medical care and culprit PCI in patients with an ACS complicated by a CS. A transthoracic echography is required to exclude some non-inclusion criteria as soon as possible and before randomization. Randomization will be performed after an informed consent is signed by the patient, a family member if he is unable to consent or thanks to the emergent consent procedure if all inclusion criteria are met and there are no non-inclusion criteria. A computer-generated randomization list will be drawn-up using a permuted block design (stratified on center). Each center will have a specific list. Randomization 1:1 to one of the 2 groups In all patients, emergent PCI of the culprit lesion will be performed. - Control group: patients will receive IV inotropes associated or not with vasopressors according to the attached protocol and based on the current guidelines (annex 1) (2, 4) in addition to emergent culprit lesion PCI - Experimental group: patients will receive IMPELLA CP before PCI on top of conventional therapy based on the same protocol as the control group and emergent culprit PCI
In the present study, we aim to investigate the effects of dobutamine infusion and/or a single intravenous (IV) dose of the IL-6 antagonist Tocilizumab administered after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) presenting < 24 hours from onset of chest pain and an intermediate to high risk of cardiogenic shock (CS) by assessment with the ORBI risk score (≥10 - not in overt shock at hospital admission). Plasma concentrations of pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (proBNP) as a proxy for development of cardiogenic shock (CS) and hemodynamic instability will be sampled for primary endpoint analysis. Effects on clinical parameters, mortality, morbidity as well as specific indicators of inflammation, cardiac function, and infarct size will secondarily be assessed noninvasively. The rationale behind the current study is that inflammatory and neurohormonal responses are associated with subclinical hemodynamic instability in patients with AMI with high risk of CS have worse outcomes. The potentially unstable condition may be targeted pharmacologically as an add-on to existing therapy. This is investigated in patients at elevated risk of CS by sampling biomarkers reflecting the inflammatory and neurohormonal responses, as well as determining effects on patient outcomes and infarct size.
Mitral regurgitation may be seen in the setting of cardiogenic shock. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure. Observational studies suggest improvements in clinical outcomes in patients with mitral regurgitation in the setting of cardiogenic shock; however, there remains a lack of randomized clinical data to support the use of TEER in cardiogenic shock. This study will be a multicenter, open-label, randomized-controlled trial with two study arms: medical therapy and TEER. Patients admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU), Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit (CSICU) or Intensive Care Units (ICU) at participating centers will be recruited. The study aims to answer the question: "Does TEER in patients with SCAI stage C or D cardiogenic with concomitant moderate or greater mitral regurgitation improve outcomes as compared to medical therapy?" The study hypothesis is that TEER will lead to an overall improvement in the composite outcome as compared to the medical therapy arm.