Cardiac Output Measurement by TEE

Cardiac Disease Clinical Trial

Official title:

Intraoperative Measurement of Cardiac Output During Cardiac Surgery: Which TEE Method is Best?

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03349970
• Other study ID #: 16-6341
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Start date: August 1, 2017
• Est. completion date: December 1, 2019

Study information

• Verified date: May 2019
• Source: University Health Network, Toronto
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has become a standard monitoring tool during cardiac surgery. It allows continuous accurate assessment of heart structures and function without interfering with the surgery and the anesthetics. The imaging of cardiac structures is used to direct optimal surgical intervention and assess surgical results. Cardiac output (CO) is the result of stroke volume (SV) multiplied by the heart rate.

Measurement of cardiac output (CO) is used to quantify the performance of the left ventricle. It is commonly achieved using a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) (also known ad Swann-Ganz catheter). A known amount of saline solution is injected in the proximal part of the catheter and the variation of blood temperature detected at the tip. Cardiac output is measured based on the duration and degree of temperature change. This method remains an accepted gold standard. TEE allows measurement of cardiac output using a number of different 2D and 3D imaging modalities. Although current guidelines identify the Method of the Disks(MOD) as the gold standard other technique could potentially be more precise. In this study, the investigators want to assess the accuracy of four different TEE methods to measure cardiac output compared with Thermodilution as a standard of care.

Description:

The measurement of the LV performance, as reflected by measuring cardiac output (CO), is an important component of hemodynamic assessment during cardiac (and non-cardiac) surgery. It has become standard of care in guiding fluid management and inotropic therapy in both the operating room (OR) and the intensive care unit (ICU) in most centres, and is considered by far the most understood and commonly communicated parameter of cardiac performance, in addition to being consistently shown as a predictor of patients' outcome.

Several methods have been used to measure CO. The most commonly used is via thermodilution (PAC), but its invasive nature and potential for serious complications led to the utilization of the non-invasive methods, such as those based on TEE.

Since the establishment of the role of TEE in the setting of hemodynamic monitoring during cardiac surgery, various ways of quantifying LV function have been utilized. The method recommended by current guidelines is a volumetric calculation via the method of disks (modified Simpson's method, MOD). Recent advances in ultrasound technology and software development allow the utilization three-dimensional (3D) volumetric assessment and speckle tracking for cardiac deformation.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 60
• Est. completion date: December 1, 2019
• Est. primary completion date: May 5, 2018
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• age >18

• undergoing elective CABG, AV or aortic surgery (aortic root and ascending aortic arch surgery), with CPB.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Emergency surgery

• Moderate or severe valve pathology

• Atrial fibrillation

• Patients with known contraindications to either the insertion of a PAC or the use of TEE.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Cardiac Disease
• Heart Diseases

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	Toronto General Hopsital	Toronto	Ontario
United States	Weill Cornell Medicine	New York	New York

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University Health Network, Toronto

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Canada, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	The primary Objective is to compare five different intraoperative echocardiographic measurements of cardiac output with the gold standard thermodilution in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.		Intraoperatively
Secondary	The secondary objective is to test each TEE method against the standard of care method of the disks		Intraoperatively