View clinical trials related to Carcinoma.
Filter by:Phase II, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm, open-label trial of atezolizumab in combination of split-doses of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The Aurea trial aims to evaluate the preliminary efficacy of atezolizumab plus split-dose gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) for the first-line setting, in patients with histologically confirmed advanced (locally advanced and metastatic) urothelial cancer in terms of overall response rate (ORR) assessed by the investigator using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Secondary objectives include: efficacy (clinical benefit rate, duration of response, time to response, overall survival and progression-free survival); safety (frequency and severity of adverse events assessed by NCI CTCAE v5.0) and exploratory endpoints ( correlation of prognostic biomarkers/factors with efficacy and relationship between the expression of PD-L1 and microbiome with ORR and PFS). At least 66 patients will be included. The treatment schedule is as follows: Atezolizumab at a fixed dose of 1200 mg/m2 by intravenous (IV) infusion on D1 of each 21-day cycle up to disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or absence of clinical benefit. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV on D1 and 1000 mg/m2 IV on D8 of each 21-day cycle plus Cisplatin 70 mg/m2 by IV on split-dose schedule of 35 mg/m2 on day 1 (D1) and 35 mg/m2 on day 8 (D8) for up to 6 cycles.
This is a phase I/Ib, first-in-human (FIH), open-label, dose escalation and dose expansion study to evaluate the safety and tolerability, biological and clinical activities of GEN-001 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors who have progressed on at least two lines of approved therapy for their histological subtypes which includes an anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 based therapy (as mono or combination), when administered as combined with avelumab.
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib and sintilimab in patients with unresectable advanced hepatocellullar carcinoma (HCC).
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with sorafenib and tislelizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellullar carcinoma (HCC).
This Phase 2b study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adavosertib, an inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase WEE1, in subjects with recurrent or persistent uterine serous carcinoma (USC) who have previously received at least 1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen for the management of USC.
This is a multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation/dose-expansion Phase 1 clinical study to investigate the safety, tolerability, PK profile, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary clinical efficacy of INCB106385 when given as monotherapy or in combination with INCMGA00012 in participants with selected CD8 T-cell-positive advanced solid tumors including SCCHN, NSCLC, ovarian cancer, CRPC, TNBC, bladder cancer, and specified GI malignancies (defined as CRC, gastric/GEJ cancer, HCC, PDAC, or SCAC)
Hepatocellular cancer is the 6th most common seen disease in the world and the 3rd in cancer-related deaths. Liver transplantation is the primary curative treatment of HCC, as it eliminates liver cancer and underlying cirrhosis. However, liver transplantation is not offered to every HCC patient, since advanced stage HCC patients are lost with tumor recurrence early after liver transplantation. The Milan criteria, which are accepted worldwide, are the patient selection criteria that we have to follow in cadaver-to-liver transplantation for HCC in our country. However, as the Milan criteria are very strict criteria, it pushes patients out of liver transplantation who exceed the Milan criteria but who can benefit from liver transplantation. Liver transplantation centers all over the world have declared their own criteria under the expanded Milan criteria. In our country, Malatya Criteria have been defined by İnönü University on this subject, and our studies on this subject still continue. When we scan the original articles of all these defined criteria, incomplete data are formed and therefore the strength of the criteria cannot be clearly revealed. For this reason, we aimed to analyze the results of our center and present information about the power of the criteria to the literature.
The purpose of this research study is to find out if a different type of imaging study called contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is as good as, or better than CT or MRI in patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after receiving TACE treatment
Sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a dose-dependent side effect in patients with advance hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The appropriate prophylactic dose of urea-based cream and comparison of its effectiveness with other creams remain unclear. The aim of this study was re-validating the prophylactic HFSR incidence density and cutaneous wetness of 10% urea-based cream on sorafenib-induced HFSR in patients with advanced HCC.
This is a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative treatment with durvalumab combined with neoajuvant therapy (carboplatin, paclitaxel with/without radiation) in locally advanced resectable oesophageal squamous carcinoma.