View clinical trials related to Breast Neoplasms.
Filter by:This is an open-label, multicenter, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics of the combination of tucatinib-Oral VP16-trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (HER2+ MBC) after progression on tucatinib-capecitabine-trastuzumab or capecitabine-related toxicity.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of investigator's choice of chemotherapy, either alone or in combination with everolimus, in treating patients with locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype with PI3K/AKT/mTOR (PAM) pathway mutation, as the first-line treatment.
This is an open-label, Phase 2 study to evaluate preliminary anti-tumor activity, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity of BDC-1001 administered as a single agent and in combination with pertuzumab in subjects with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (Enhertu®).
A Single-Center Retrospective Study About Efficacy and Safety of Eribulin-Based Regimen in the Treatment of Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Comparison With Other Chemotherapy Regimen
This is an open-label, single-arm phase II trial of first-line treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) for patients with locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, luminal androgen receptor subtype (TNBC-LAR) with low HER2 expression.
This is a Phase III open-label study to assess if camizestrant improves outcomes compared to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer with intermediate-high or high risk for disease recurrence who completed definitive locoregional therapy (with or without chemotherapy). The planned duration of treatment in either arm within the study will be 7 years.
Breast surgery may be overtreatment when there is a complete response to systemic neoadjuvant treatment as determined clinically and by imaging. However the reliability of imaging techniques (ultrasound, mammography and magnetic resonance) in identifying complete response varies in published studies and surgery remains the preferred method of detecting residual disease. The aims of this study are: 1. To assess the reliability of minimally invasive preoperative image-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) in identifying residual breast in cT1-cT2-cT3, cN0-cN1 breast cancer patients, either with complete clinical/radiological response, or with residual breast disease <1 cm, after systemic neoadjuvant treatment. 2. To assess the reliability of minimally invasive preoperative image-guided needle biopsy in identifying residual axillary disease in cT1-cT2-cT3, cN0-cN1 breast cancer patients, either with complete clinical/radiological response, or with residual breast disease <1 cm, after systemic neoadjuvant treatment. After neoadjuvant treatment, and evaluation with ultrasound, mammography and magnetic resonance, VAB will be performed on the breast, and needle biopsy will be performed on the axillary lymph node of pre-treatment cN1 cases, previously marked with a magnetic clip. The biopsy findings will be compared with the surgical findings, consisting in quadrantectomy or mastectomy plus sentinel node biopsy (or separate removal of tagged lymph nodes if they do not coincide with the sentinel node(s)) to assess the ability of biopsy to identify residual disease.
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in participants with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low or HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0 (who are both hormone receptor [HR]-negative and HR-positive) unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer.
Background: Breast cancer (BC) treatments usually include a combination of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. These life-saving treatments cause high percentages of arm morbidity, which often lasts for months, or develops months after surgery. Arm and shoulder morbidity includes prolonged pain, restriction of movement, limitation of function and lymphedema (chronic progressive edema). All of these morbidities affect the quality of life (QOL) of the recovering patients and require lengthy care. Early detection of patients at risk and provision of proactive treatment can improve the recovery process from surgery and oncology treatments. Aim: To develop a screening tool for the early identification of women at high risk for prolonged arm morbidity following BC treatments (persistent pain, lymphedema, function deficits and decreased range of motion), validate the tool, and examine the efficiency of intervention based on the the use of the tool.
Adapted physical activity (APA) was recognized as a non-drug therapy by the French Health Authority (HAS) in 2011. Very few studies have examined the efficiency of APA programs during the active phase of treatment in cancer patients. The investigators assumed that non-drug therapy such as APA could improve the quality of life and reduces health costs. The main objective of this study is to assess the efficiency of a standardized APA program, as compared to conventional management including simple recommendations for the practice of physical activity in women in phase active breast cancer treatment.