View clinical trials related to Breast Neoplasms.
Filter by:This study aimed to evaluate the effect of simulation-based breast health education on breast cancer awareness and breast self-examination practices of Afghan refugee women. The study hypothesized that simulation-based breast health education would have an effect on breast cancer awareness and breast self-examination practices scores among Afghan refugee women.
To observe and evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of continuous use of OFS for premenopausal patients with early breast cancer after 5 years use of OFS. This study is a multicenter, prospective, observational, non randomized controlled, open-label real world study based on hospital medical record system data, aimed at evaluating the benefits of continuing to use OFS after 5 years of use. The retrospective analysis plan includes patient data from September 1, 2023 to September 1, 2026. Join two cohorts: the continued use group and the discontinued use group after 5 years of OFS, respectively.
Rationale: Breast cancer patients are increasingly treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for various reasons. These women receive chemotherapy before any surgery is performed. Many of these tumors need preoperative seed localization to help guide the surgeons to the site of the tumor within the breast. The interest is shifting towards to use of non-radioactive seeds, such as the magnetic seeds used in this study. A drawback of these seeds is the fact that they cause large susceptibility artifacts on (magnetic!) MRI of the breast. Breast MRI is the most accurate modality to monitor response to therapy of these women. CEM, an emerging breast imaging technique, has shown to achieve comparable results with regard to response monitoring but uses no magnetic fields. Hence, CEM might be an attractive alternative response monitoring tool in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and having a magnetic seed a surgical marker. To this point, however, no study in humans has confirmed that this is indeed the case. Objective: To test whether the use of magnetic localization seeds causes image artifacts on CEM. Study design: Observational feasibility study. Study population: Women (>18 years) able to provide written informed consent and recently diagnosed with (non-palpable) breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), who are primarily treated with surgery. Intervention (if applicable): Image-guided placement of a magnetic seed (Sirius Pintuition) prior to surgery, including control imaging to confirm the correct location of the seed relative to the breast abnormality. In usual patient care this is performed with full-field digital mammography (FFDM), but in this study this control image will be performed with the system in 'contrast-enhanced mammography' or CEM mode, but without using intravenous administration of iodinated contrast agent because the purpose is not repetition of diagnostic imaging, but to rule out any artifacts caused by the seed on CEM. The investigators estimate to include twenty patients to confidently test the hypothesis that magnetic seeds do not cause disturbing artifacts on CEM examinations. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary study aim will be to test whether the magnetic seeds caused any disturbing artifacts on CEM images. As secondary study, the investigators will document technical success rate of seed deployment and retrieval during surgery, including the assessment of the surgical margins (positive or negative).
This phase II trial tests how well an exercise intervention, Exercising Together, works in preventing declines in physical and mental health in couples during radiation treatment for cancer. Treatments for cancer can cause side effects such as fatigue as well as strain on relationships. Exercising Together is a partnered exercise program that adds communication, collaboration and support between partners during exercise to fortify the relationship and amplify the benefits of physical training. Exercising Together program may be effective on the mental and physical health of couples during radiation treatment for cancer.
In the current scenario, a reliable liquid biopsy method for predicting outcomes in solid tumors, especially among breast cancer patients, is lacking. Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) serve as crucial indicators of metastasis, and their early detection could significantly enhance patient stratification and facilitate the customization of personalized treatments. However, detecting CTCs in breast cancer patients presents complexities due to their substantial phenotypic heterogeneity and typically low concentration. Numerous approaches have been developed for CTC detection. Nonetheless, the currently available technologies remain intricate, time-consuming, and costly. The BioCellPhe Project is dedicated to the development of a novel device capable of isolating and characterizing individual CTCs. This innovative device relies on the identification of specific cell membrane proteins with remarkable precision, achieved through the application of novel orthogonal techniques. On one hand, engineered bacteria are utilized to precisely bind to membrane proteins of interest on CTCs. On the other hand, Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) is employed for the detection of individual molecules. Specifically, the BioCellPhe Project focuses on comprehensively studying CTCs in breast cancer patients, encompassing both metastatic and non-metastatic cases.
TUXEDO-4 is an international, multicentric, single arm, phase II study aiming to gather additional solid evidence of Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan (T-DXd) activity in patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer with active brain metastases. This study will analyze the efficacy of T-DXd as determined by overall response rate (ORR) at any timepoint as judged by best CNS response according to RANO-BM criteria.
This clinical study includes a dose escalation trial of BEBT-209 monotherapy in HR +/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients and a Phase 1b trial of BEBT-209 as a single therapy, in combination with letrozole, and in combination with fulvestrant in ER +/HER2- advanced breast cancer in women. To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic profile, and preliminary efficacy of BEBT-209 as a single therapy, in combination with letrozole, and in combination with fulvestrant. To determine the recommended dose for late clinical studies of monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with HR +/HER2- advanced breast cancer.
Obesity could become the first evitable cause of breast cancer in the near future. Due to the relatively slow rate of development in this field, greater efforts must be applied in this area. The HYPOTHESIS of this work is that "a therapy to lose weight in breast cancer women with obesity during the oncological treatment could contribute to slowing carcinogenesis, and to improve the response to the chemotherapy, survival and prevent future recurrences by erasing deleterious epigenetic marks". A group of breast cancer women with obesity (n=90) will be treated to lose weight during the oncologic treatment with a low calorie-ketogenic diet or a group educational intervention program of healthy lifestyle. The reversibility of the obesity-related breast cancer epigenetic signatures (EPIC array and pyrosequencing) and other molecular features (QRTPCR, ELISA assays) in blood leukocytes and plasma and the progression of disease will be compared with an obesity (n=30) and normalweight (n=30) group under conventional anticancer therapy. A matched-group of tumor-free women (n=60) with obesity will be also treated to lose weight with the same nutritional interventions and compared with tumor-free women with normal weight (n=30) in order to evaluate the potential preventive function of weight loss therapies on cancer-related odds. The outcomes of this project will directly benefit overweight and obese patients from healthcare systems, and also to have an economic value supporting pharmaceutical and food industry companies in the design of innovative treatments, useful biomarkers and preventive tools.
When we talk about early identification, we are talking about an ALREADY EXISTING INJURY, triggering a change in the patient's quality of life and a projection of future costs for the health system. INNOVATIVE ASPECT: While screening mammography identifies an existing lesion, VTM could: Make an early diagnosis before the formation of a visible or palpable tumor mass; Check the metabolic activity in suspicious lesions identified by other diagnostic methods; Demarcate tumor range and tumor similarity from a distance in breast cancer. Regarding the Risk x Benefit:There are no medications incorporated, associated or administered by the equipment; There is no ionizing radiation incorporated or delivered by the equipment; There are no contraindications for the use of the equipment by the patient (Non-ionizing infrared radiation, without contrast or contact); Audience destined to operate the equipment: Physician / Radiologist with training Therefore, the research in question is of great relevance for such a debilitating health problem for the patient and for the health system.
IMPORTANT study is a multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized-controlled, non-inferiority trial with a pragmatic approach involving older patients (≥ 70 years old) with advanced hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, not amenable for curative treatment and without prior therapy for advanced disease, who are suitable to receive CDK 4/6-inhibitors plus endocrine therapy as first line therapy. The study implements two approaches with high level of evidence, namely the use of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) approach in treatment decision making and the use of CDK 4/6-inhibitors as the initial treatment of choice, to investigate whether a common clinical practice (starting dose reduction of CDK 4/6-inhibitors in older patients) with evidence of low certainty can be standardized using a more individualized-based approach. On the basis of baseline CGA assessment, patients will either receive full dose of CDK 4/6-inhibitors plus endocrine therapy (if patients are fit according to CGA) or be randomized to full dose vs. reduced initial dose of CDK 4/6-inhibitors (if vulnerable or frail according to CGA). The study hypothesis is that adjusting the dose according to vulnerability will allow patients to tolerate treatment better without jeopardizing the treatment efficacy. This project has received funding from the European Union's HORIZON 2022 research and innovation actions supporting the implementation of the Mission on Cancer under grant agreement No 101104589.