View clinical trials related to Breast Neoplasms.
Filter by:This is a phase 2, open-label, single-arm trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in combination with pembrolizumab following disease progression after two prior lines of standard therapy in unresectable metastatic stage IV breast cancer
This phase III trial studies how well Mepitel Film works in reducing radiation dermatitis (redness and peeling) in patients with breast cancer during radiation therapy after a mastectomy. Mepitel Film may reduce the severity of skin redness and peeling in the area of radiation.
This study is a retrospective, multi-site, patient-level medical chart review of US adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC) who initiated talazoparib on or after October 16, 2018 and were managed by participating providers from Cardinal Health's Oncology Provider Extended Network (OPEN). This study will describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes of talazoparib-treated patients in real-world practice setting in US. The primary population for this study includes: -HER2-negative ABC patients with germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) mutations treated with talazoparib monotherapy initiated on or after October 16, 2018 and ≥18 years of age at initiation of talazoparib.
This is an epidemiological cross-sectional study aiming to determine the prevalence of lymphedema and the incidence of risk factors in patients diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer in a cohort from 2008 to 2020 in a specialised oncology centre in Valle del Cauca, Colombia.
The objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Olinvacimab in combination with Pembrolizumab in patients with mTNBC.
This research is being done to compare rates of hair loss of people with metastatic breast who use scalp cooling versus those who do not use scalp cooling after receiving standard of care treatment with either sacituzumab govitecan, trastuzumab deruxtecan, or eribulin. The name of the study intervention involved in this study is: - Paxman Scalp Cooling System
Neoadjuvant or primary systemic treatment is increasingly applied in the treatment of operable breast cancer. Down staging of the primary tumor is one of the important goals of neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment (NCT), thereby permitting breast-conserving treatment without affecting the risk for a local relapse. Complete pathological response (pCR) rates after NCT vary across histological subtypes and can be more than 60% in HER2-positive disease with dual blockade therapy. Down staging of the axilla is also observed in patients initially presenting with metastatic lymph nodes. pCR rates in the axilla vary between 22% and 42% in reported series, again depending on tumor subtype. Omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can avoid the post-operative morbidity such as lymphedema in the short or long term follow-up. Metastatic lymph node status is hard to be stated as a pCR in the axilla by using physical examination or imaging such as ultrasonography or tomography after complete NCT. Good response to the axilla lymph node causing the difficulty of tissue proof by using core needle biopsy, though the investigator knew that biopsy stands for the definite tool for the confirmation of the residual disease. One proposed method to decrease the false-negative rate (FNR) is clip placement in the positive node at initial diagnosis with confirmation of clipped node resection at surgery. The correlation between the axillary lymph node identified on initial axillary ultrasound and the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) identified at surgery has not been fully evaluated. The concordance between percutaneous biopsy and the lymph node resected at the time of SLNB is not 100%. Sometimes, the initial node identified by ultrasound is not one of the SLNs. The impairment of the performance of SLNB might correlated to the alteration of lymphatic flow induced by tissue fibrosis or tumor deposits after NCT. The investigator hypothesized that the clip placement at diagnosis of node-positive disease with removal of the clipped node during SLNB reduces the FNR of SLNB after NCT. Here, we evaluate how often the lymph node containing the clip placed at percutaneous biopsy before chemotherapy was found at surgery to be one of the SLNs, and how often it was found in the nodes retrieved at ALND. In addition, the investigator report the impact of identification of the clipped node within the SLNs on the FNR of SLNB.
The primary objective of this study, sponsored by Travera in Massachusetts, is to validate whether the mass response biomarker has potential to predict response of patients to specific therapies or therapeutic combinations using isolated tumor cells from varying cancers and biopsy formats.
Detection of molecular relapse with circulating tumour DNA analysis can identify which patients with ER positive breast cancer are relapsing on adjuvant endocrine therapy. This trial will aim to demonstrate that palbociclib and fulvestrant, can defer or prevent relapse in patients with ctDNA detected molecular relapse. The TRAK-ER trial will have two phases, a ctDNA surveillance phase and a randomised therapy trial in patients with positive ctDNA. The TRAK-ER trial will establish a ctDNA screening programme for patients with ER positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy with at least a further three years of standard adjuvant endocrine therapy planned. Patients recruited into the TRAK-ER study will have high-risk clinical features to identify patients at higher risk of future relapse. ctDNA assays will be used to identify which people are at very high risk of relapse (i.e. those with a positive ctDNA result), and randomise this high risk population between standard endocrine therapy versus palbociclib plus fulvestrant for up to two years.
This is an observational retrospective study which aims at comparing the 5-year survival estimates from "PREDICT V2.2" with observed 5-year outcome from our dataset of Indian women treated for operable breast cancer. "PREDICT V2.2" is a prognostication and treatment benefit tool developed in the UK. It is a tool available online (www.predict.nhs.uk) providing 5-and 10-year survival estimates and treatment benefit predictions, for operable breast cancer patients. We hypothesize that 5-year overall survival (OS) predictions using "PREDICT V2.2" will have reasonable accuracy and applicability to the Indian operable breast cancer patients. The predictions, if accurate, will not only reassure the patients of the benefits of the treatment being offered, which outweigh the side effects but it will also make clinician as well as patient confident about avoiding potentially toxic systemic therapies, where the benefit is too small.