View clinical trials related to Breast Neoplasms.
Filter by:This research study is looking to see whether the combination of Dostarlimab and Niraparib plus Radiation Therapy (RT) is safe and effective in participants with metastatic triple negative breast cancer. The names of the study treatment involved in this study are: - Dostarlimab - Niraparib - Radiation Therapy (RT), which is given per standard of care.
Neoadjuvant treatment is an important treatment for early breast cancer patients. Patients with triple negative subtype who achieved pCR after neoadjuvant treatment would have longer survival. The neoadjuvant treatment for her2 negative patient was chemotherapy with combined drugs. However, not all patients benefit from chemotherapy but suffer from chemotherapy-related side effects. It was unknown for a patient who could benefit from which drug before chemotherapy. Drug sensitivity screening in vitro was a promising method for choosing chemotherapy. But there was no method could select effective drugs accurately for breast cancer patients until now. Previously, investigators developed a patient-derived tumor-like cell clusters in vitro culture technology. Feasibility for guiding clinical treatment by drug sensitivity screening based on this technology have been explored by preliminary exploration with a well corresponding. And the results have been published. This study will explore whether drug screening in vitro patient-derived tumor-like cell clusters from breast cancer tissue could be a method for selection of chemotherapy for her2 negative participants.
Breast cancer directly affects women physically, psychologically and socially in the process of diagnosis, treatment and post-treatment. Despite the improvement in conventional breast cancer treatments that led to longer disease-free survival, many patients still suffer from physical, psychological, social and spiritual problems after treatment. The neglect of physical and psychosocial problems faced by patients who are between 1 and 2 years after the end of treatment negatively impacts the quality of life of this population.
The gold standard of surgical treatment for patients with early breast cancer (BC) is breast conservation and sentinel node biopsy (SNB). Ongoing randomized trials are evaluating to omit surgery at all when axillary imaging is negative. However, the available diagnostic tools still have several limitations in accuracy. Combining the specificity of PET, with the superior sensitivity of MRI, hybrid PET/MRI might be a non-invasive, one-stage, operator-independent imaging method to accurately define nodal status and, whenever negative, might replace surgery for axillary staging. The project includes patients with <3 cm BC without overt nodal involvement who will undergo PET/MRI prior to surgery. The primary aim is to compare the staging power between SNB and PET/MRI in detecting axillary lymph node macrometastases (>2 mm). Additionally, general concordance and diagnostic accuracy of PET/MRI vs SNB, eventual correlation with BC molecular subtypes and MRI findings will be evaluated.
A Global, Phase 2 Study of ARX788 in HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients who were previously treated with T-DXd
The management of axillary nodes in breast cancer patients is a highly debated and evolving field. To date, an increasing number of patients with positive lymph nodes receives primary systemic therapy (PST) prior to surgery leading to down-staging axillary nodes in about 40% of women. However, the available diagnostic methods have several limitations in properly evaluating the response after treatment both in the breast and in the nodes and might lead to either under or over-treatment in these patients. Fully integrated scanners capable of simultaneous acquisition of PET and MRI have now been developed, with the potential to combine the specificity obtained by the functional imaging of PET, with the superior sensitivity of MRI, to provide higher diagnostic accuracy. It is expected that PET/MRI could better determine the response after PST to distinguish patients with negative versus patients with positive axillary nodes after medical treatment. As the excision of axillary nodes has mainly a staging purpose, the reliable identification of node negative patients might eventually spare women from unnecessary surgery. An accurate over-time and final imaging work-up might help choose the appropriate type of surgery according to the extent of nodal involvement: either SNB or complete axillary clearance.
Breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) is the most common complication after breast cancer surgery, which brings a heavy psychological and spiritual burden to patients. For a long time, the diagnosis and treatment of lymphedema has been a difficult point in domestic and foreign research. To a large extent, it is because most of the patients who come to see a doctor have already developed obvious lymphedema, and the internal lymphatic vessels have undergone pathological remodeling[1] Therefore, it is particularly important to detect early lymphedema and intervene in time through the use of sensitive screening tools. Indocyanine green (ICG) lymphangiography is a relatively new method, which can display superficial lymph flow in real time and quickly, and will not be affected by radioactivity [7]. In 2007, indocyanine green lymphography was used for the first time to evaluate the function of superficial lymphatic vessels. In 2011, Japanese scholars found skin reflux signs based on ICG lymphography data of 20 patients with lymphedema after breast cancer surgery, and they were roughly divided into three types according to their severity: splash, star cluster, and diffuse (Figure 1) [8]. Later, in 2016, a prospective study involving 196 people affirmed the value of ICG lymphography in the early diagnosis of lymphedema, and made the images of ICG lymphography more specific stages 0-5 [9], but The staging is still based on the three types of skin reflux symptoms found in a small sample clinical study in 2011, which is not completely applicable in actual clinical applications. In addition, when abnormal skin reflux symptoms appear on ICG lymphangiography, the pathophysiological changes that occur in the body lack research and exploration. Therefore, this research hopes to refine the image features of ICG lymphography through machine learning (deep learning), and establish a PKUPH model for diagnosing early lymphedema by staging the image features.
This project will assess the efficacy of an 8-week virtual exercise program on physical function offered to those with a breast cancer diagnosis currently receiving endocrine therapy. The intervention includes twice-weekly virtual group exercise classes. Participants also complete one to three independent home exercise sessions per week throughout the intervention. Testing will occur virtually at baseline, 8-weeks (at end of program) and follow-up evaluations will be performed at 16-weeks and 12- months after baseline testing. Questionnaires will be administered through REDCap. Exercise sessions and testing will be administered virtually via Zoom.
For this study, the investigators propose investigation of a new imaging technique, Harmonic Motion Imaging (HMI), and the evaluation of its potential role in prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The investigators hypothesize that changes in HMI parameters will predict response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in early-stage breast cancer.
Estrogen Receptor (ER) is a crucial prognostic factor and treatment target in breast cancer patients. Knowledge of its status greatly influences the choice of the optimal course of treatment. Pathological evaluations of primary tumor, axillary nodes, and metastases are the only confirmatory approach to ER status determination and are limited to known and accessible sites. However, it is known that many advanced breast cancer patients harbor diseases presenting inter-tumor or temporal ER heterogeneity, as ER expression can vary between tumor foci and can evolve during treatment and at time of recurrence, hence the need for whole-body, non-invasive assessment of ER status. In the last decades, 16α-[18F]fluoroestradiol (FES) was developed and evaluated as an ER-targeting positron emission tomography (PET) tracer. FES correlated with ER expression, and recently was shown to be able to predict hormone therapy response. Our Center designed and evaluated 4-fluoro-11β-methoxy-16α-[18F]fluoroestradiol (4FMFES), a successor PET tracer for ER imaging. Paired comparison during a phase II clinical trial showed that 4FMFES produced images of better quality, with less overall non-specific signal than FES. It resulted in a significantly improved tumor contrast and tumor detectability using 4FMFES-PET leading to increased diagnosis confidence in early-stage breast cancer compared to FES-PET. Those results demonstrated that, as of now, 4FMFES-PET is the best imaging modality worldwide for whole-body ER status determination, but further validations are necessary to position this method as a standard and essential tool for breast cancer management. Like what was observed for FES-PET, preliminary data suggest that 4FMFES-PET combined with FDG-PET will yield very high sensibility for breast tumor detection, each method being complementary. In continuity with previous work, we seek to expand our clinical knowledge of this high-potential diagnostic imaging through the following main objective: Launch a phase II clinical trial to explore the full potential and benefit of 4FMFES-PET in combination with FDG-PET for advanced ER+ breast cancer patients to demonstrate it is an essential tool for cancer management. This proposed project will focus on 3 specific aims: 1. Compare and complement 4FMFES-PET with FDG-PET and conventional imaging modalities, and evaluate how they improved prognosis and staging of ER+ advanced breast cancer patients; 2. Correlate 4FMFES/FDG uptake and staging with pathological data (histology, receptor status, grade), including distal biopsy metastases sampling; 3. Correlate 4FMFES/FDG uptake and staging with longitudinal outcomes (treatment response, progression-free survival, time-to-relapse) to determine which cohort of patient benefit most from 4FMFES.