View clinical trials related to Breast Neoplasms.
Filter by:This Phase III Trial evaluates whether breast conservation surgery and endocrine therapy results in a non-inferior rate of invasive or non-invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) compared to breast conservation with breast radiation and endocrine therapy.
A assessment of the efficacy of first-/second-line endocrine therapies ± target therapies and chemotherapy in real-life of in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer has not yet been conducted in Moscow. Methods: Observational, retrospective study carried out in oncology hospitals in Moscow, in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. The descriptive analysis will be conducted for patient characteristics, responses to treatment and treatment outcomes. This study will provide retrospective chart review of evidence on the use of therapy in routine clinical practice, with a focus in population of Moscow
Study LAE205INT3101 is a Phase Ib/III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy with afuresertib plus fulvestrant (afuresertib/placebo plus fulvestrant in Phase III) in patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer who have failed 1 to 2 prior lines of endocrine therapy, and/or CDK4/6 inhibitor (up to 1 therapy), and/or chemotherapy (up to 1 chemotherapy) as described in the inclusion criteria.
This study will evaluate the local control, complication rates, cosmetic results, and quality of life between patients treated with a single fraction vs. five fractions of accelerated partial breast irradiation (S_APBI vs. F_APBI) when used as the sole method of radiation therapy.
This is a 3-arm study stratified by plasma ctDNA. Patients with residual TNBC disease after pre-operative therapy will be assigned to 1 of 3 Arms based on plasma ctDNA positivity and genomic marker(s).
The achievement of pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is associated with improved outcome across all breast cancer (BC) subtypes. Anthracycline and taxanes based chemotherapy is usually the first choice of NACT for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative breast cancer, but there is no ideal second-line therapy for those with unsatisfactory effect after first-line NACT. Vinorelbine combined with cisplatin may be a choice for patients after failure or progression with anthracycline and/or taxanes. Immunotherapy has achieved good efficacy in many malignant tumors. Chemotherapy may have a certain immune activation effect, thus combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy has significant clinical value in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. So we designed this one center single arm phase 2 clinical trial to test the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab (PD-1 inhibitor) combined with vinorelbine and cisplatin as a second-line therapy for HER2 negative breast cancer patients who did not achieve significant effect after 2 cycle treatments of anthracycline plus taxanes NACT. The target population of our study are early-stage HER2 negative breast cancer patients with indications of NACT who did not receive partial response after 2 cycle of standard anthracycline and taxanes treaments according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. The enrolled patients will receive 6 cycles of camrelizumab combined with vinorelbine and cisplatin as second-line neoadjuvant therapy. Then they need to undergo surgery. The subjects have to continue camrelizumab until it is totally used for 1 year (about 17 cycles in all). The patients will routinely receive conventional adjuvant therapy and enter the long-term follow-up to get their survival infoumation.
Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women in France, with an estimated 50,000 new cases each year. Prognosis is good, with a standardized survival rate of 85% at 5 years from diagnosis. Half of the women affected are of working age. Return to work after breast cancer faces barriers pertaining to the patients and their environment. There are social disparities in employment. Women with a lesser education and older women are at higher risk to lose their job. No intervention, to date, has demonstrated its effectiveness to facilitate return to work and reduce social disparities in employment after breast cancer. Current limitations of the interventions are to be over-medicalized and hospital-centered, to lack of theoretical foundations, and to be at risk of implementation failure. In a previous phase of the FASTRACS project, an intersectoral Community Advisory Board involving the different categories of stakeholders was launched to perform a needs analysis and build the logic model of the FASTRACS intervention with the Intervention Mapping protocol. The main objective of the FASTRACS intervention is to facilitate sustained return to work (RTW) after breast cancer. Secondary objectives are to improve work-related quality of life and to decrease social disparities in employment after breast cancer. Eligible patients are women: (1) aged between 18 and 55 years; (2) in paid employment; (3) diagnosed with a locally invasive non-metastatic first breast cancer (4) treated by surgery and chemotherapy in an adjuvant or neoadjuvant situation. Recruitment will take place in six investigating centres (centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, hôpital femme-mère-enfant, centre Léon Bérard, hôpital Jean Mermoz, Clinique Charcot), after surgery and before the beginning of the chemotherapy. Women will be randomized between 2 groups (intervention vs control) with a stratification on the including centre, age, and socioprofessional category. The intervention is founded on a multilevel logic model addressing the social determinants of health. It is composed of 4 successive steps during which 4 tools will be used. The first step involves an interview at the end of chemotherapy with a nurse, during which the patient is given a guide to returning to work. The second step is a transitional consultation in the month following the end of radiotherapy (or chemotherapy for patients without radiotherapy), with the general practitioner (GP), with a checklist designed to individualise the patient's care. The third step is a pre-RTW visit to the occupational physician (OP) at a time deemed appropriate by the patient and her GP, with a checklist to facilitate the accomodation of the workstation and the job retention strategy. The fourth and final step will only occur for patients who have not returned to work 10 months after inclusion, and will involve an interview with an OP specialised in return-to-work (RTW) coordination. The last tool is an employer's guide that will be given by the patient to her OP and her manager, with practical advice for managers and colleagues to facilitate the RTW process. The evaluation of the intervention will be performed with mixed-methods by a realist randomized controlled trial including 210 patients in each group. For the effect evaluation, the primary outcome is a composite endpoint including: (a) a sustained return to work 12 months after oncological treatments (OT) ; and (b) the number of days on sick leave 12 months after oncological treatments. Secondary outcomes will include the patients' perspective (quality of life, anxiety, depression, RTW self-efficacy, social support, physical activity, work role functioning, work conditions), process outcomes (transition visit with the GP, pre RTW visit with the OP, other visits), and implementation outcomes (reach and use of the intervention tools). Expected public health impact: Provided it is acceptable, effective and sustainable, the innovative intervention developed in this project is likely to decrease the impact of breast cancer on employment, and to decrease social disparities in employment after breast cancer. According to the mechanisms activated in each context under study (centres, workplaces), it could be scaled-up but also adapted to fit the needs of patients with other cancers or other chronic health conditions.
Chinese herbs can alleviates the side effects caused by conventional treatment in breast cancer patients and affects the syndrome element differentiation by altering the specific set of proteomes at specific time point of treatment.
This clinical trial will assess the safety and early efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine or Avelumab, with or without Palbociclib, in early-stage ER+ breast cancer patients who are found to harbor disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in the bone marrow after definitive surgery and standard adjuvant therapy.
Breast cancer surgery usually results in reduced range of motion of the shoulder joint, weakness of the musculature and altered scapular kinematics during movement. These factors limit activities of daily living, so rehabilitation exercises help to restore function after shoulder surgery. Women with breast cancer often have a life conditioned by the sequelae or morbidity secondary to the treatment of the disease and, despite the high cure rate, many patients are unable to regain their initial quality of life. Cancer therapies can leave physical, psychological and psychosocial sequelae, which may manifest themselves or persist even years after the end of treatment. For all these reasons, patients who have undergone cancer treatment need physical rehabilitation as well as psychological and social care to support them in their new stage of life, and to optimise the rehabilitation programme, it is necessary to identify each patient's individual needs, The digital support proposed in this study enables the development of a physiotherapy programme for patients with breast cancer in a situation of health crisis, which includes providing assistance, information, accompaniment, help and treatment to these patients in a comprehensive way, based on the biopsychosocial model.