View clinical trials related to Breast Neoplasm Female.
Filter by:Background: Mastectomies are traditionally performed under general anesthesia (GA), often with the addition of regional anesthesia for post-operative pain relief. Thoracic paravertebral blocks (TPVB) had previously been described in the literature to be sufficient for intra-operative anesthesia as an alternative to GA. A 2021 literature review by Cochrane Library comparing paravertebral anesthesia (with or without sedation) to general anesthesia for patients undergoing oncologic breast surgery showed that TPVB could reduce post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), hospital stay, postoperative pain and time to ambulation. It also resulted in greater patient satisfaction compared to GA. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of single-injection TPVB done under ultrasound guidance for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery without axillary node dissection. Hypothesis: Single-injection thoracic paravertebral block is non-inferior to multiple (3) injections for oncologic unilateral breast surgery anesthesia. Methods: The current study is a prospective randomized controlled trial of patients undergoing oncologic breast surgery without axillary node dissection or immediate reconstruction. Patients will be randomized into two groups; thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) single-injection or TPVB multiple (three) injections. Significance/Importance: Oncologic breast surgery performed under TPVB and sedation lowers the risks of post-operative nausea and vomiting, decreases peri-operative use of narcotics, decreases pain scores at rest and on mobilization and leads to better overall patient satisfaction when compared to GA. It also leads to shorter hospital stays. Most studies use multiple injections to perform the block. Even though the risks associated with TPVB are low (3.6 per 1000 surgeries), the single-injection technique could reduce the risks even more. One injection is also easier to perform and of shorter duration, leading to greater patient tolerance and less side effects related to blocks performance duration such as vaso-vagal reactions or general discomfort. To date, no studies have compared the efficacy of single-injection paravertebral block and multiple injection techniques as the main modality of anesthesia for breast cancer surgery.
The goal of this pilot observational study is to learn about the feasibility of collecting patient-reported data and stool and blood samples from patients age 65 and older treated with aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer. Participants will be treated with standard of care aromatase inhibitor therapy and will undergo serial phlebotomy, complete patient-reported questionnaires, and submit serial stool samples. The main exploratory translational questions it aims to obtain preliminary data for are: - What are the effects of aromatase inhibitor therapy on biomarkers of aging? - What are the effects of aromatase inhibitor therapy on the microbiome? These data will be used for the development of future definitive studies.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the safety of axillary or primary breast approach for second-stage operation in expander-implant breast reconstruction for breast cancer patients. The main question it aims to answer are: 1. if the wound related events, including wound dehiscence, infection, delayed healing is significant less often in patients receiving second stage operation via axillary approach compared with primary breast approach; 2. if the aesthetic outcome is comparable between patients receiving different approach for second stage operation. To answer these questions, the breast cancer patients have received nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy and had breast tissue expander insertion via breast incision, will be prospectively recruited, and randomized into two groups while receiving implant exchange operation: (1) operate via axillary incision; (2) operate via primary breast incision.
This study investigates the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab, pyrotinib combined with dalpiciclib and endocrine therapy for patients with advanced HR+/HER2+ brest cancer, providing more possible effective regimens for the survival benefit of these patients in clinical practice.
Phi-Bra is a prospective and monocentric pilot study to assess the diagnostic capability of an innovative bra prototype to detect breast cancer, compared to the current standard of care: the mammography. The Phi-Bra prototype is designed with sensors measuring different parameters simultaneously such as impedance and temperature. The bra will be tested on patients without breast lump (American College of Radiology (ACR) 1 et 2 Birads classification) and with breast lump (ACR 4b, c ou ACR 5 Birads classification). The aim of this pilot study is to compare the results obtained by Phi-Bra to the ones obtained by mammography. The Phi-Bra study is classified as clinical investigation category 4.4 based on the European Union (EU) regulation (DM 2017/745).
This pilot study will assess the feasibility of a gratitude intervention to promote physical activity, and well-being and positively impact biomarkers of health among older African American breast cancer survivors. The intervention will also include a goal-setting component to promote exercise readiness and examine the cultural phenomena of the Superwoman schema among Black women.
This is a single-arm, open-label phase IV study of patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer who are treated first line with ribociclib and standard of care endocrine treatment according to SmPC.
The primary objective of this study is to determine in women with node negative BC ≤3cm in size, if PBI compared to WBI, both given once-a-day over 1 week following BCS, is non-inferior for LR and reduces adverse cosmesis. The primary outcomes are LR and patient-assessed cosmesis at 3 years post randomization.
Assess the quality of life in patients with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-type 2 negative metastatic breast cancer treated in first line (patients with new metastasis or recurrence during adjuvant endocrine therapy): comparison between public and private institutions. The hypothesis to be evaluated is that patients treated in private institutions have a better quality of life when compared to patients treated in public institutions.
Combining a fitness tracker technology with real-time patient-reported outcome monitoring associated with interventions through a health care app is a novel strategy to evaluate metastatic breast cancer patients using Palbociclib and endocrine treatment.