Breast Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
Developing a Diagnostic Tool, Using SPAG5, for Predicting Clinical Benefit From Standard Anthracycline Combination (AC) in Breast Cancer
Every year nearly 62,000 people are diagnosed with breast cancer in the UK. One in eight
women in the UK will develop breast cancer in their lifetime.
The investigators are developing an inexpensive test to accurately predict how breast cancer
patients will respond to the standard chemotherapy Anthracycline (AC). Only 15-20% of
patients have no tumour remaining following AC, so a method of treatment selection is
urgently needed.
Breast cancers are currently treated with a combination of chemotherapy, targeted therapy and
surgery. However, breast cancers are not identical; each tumour's individual characteristics
affect how they respond to treatment. Recently the investigators discovered a new tumour
characteristic, a protein which is unusually active in approximately 20% of breast cancers.
It was found that a patient whose tumour showed high activity often respond well to AC, and
vice versa.
AC is an aggressive treatment which can potentially cause severe side effects, including a
risk of permanent heart damage. It is important, therefore, to spare those patients who will
not benefit from AC the physical and emotional side-effects of this drug. Currently, there is
no predictive test for selecting which patients will benefit from AC and which will not. The
investigators have shown that an accurate prediction can be made by testing the activity of a
protein called 'SPerm associated AntiGen 5' (SPAG5) in tumour tissue.
The aim is to develop a clinical SPAG5 testing kit that can be used by hospital laboratories
to determine the activity of SPAG5 in the tumour. This information will help guide the choice
of treatment and achieve better patient outcomes.
In June 2018 the investigators started a three year National Institute for Health Research
(NIHR) funded project to develop a lab test that could form the basis of a SPAG5 testing kit.
Approximately 16,700,000 people are diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) worldwide each year,
with 500,000 people dying annually. In the UK alone, each year nearly 62,000 people are
diagnosed with BC, with one in eight women developing BC in their lifetime. Breast cancers
are currently treated with a combination of chemotherapy, targeted therapy and surgery.
However, breast cancers are not identical; each tumour's individual characteristics affect
how they respond to treatment. In many cases, treatment options are limited and patients are
often given sub-optimal treatments which are associated with burdensome side effects. For
instance, despite chemotherapy being offered to about 60-70% of patients with BC, either
alone or in combination with other targeted therapies, results from a meta-analysis of 123
randomised trials including more than 100,000 patients has shown that chemotherapy reduces
recurrence and mortality in only 20 to 33% of patients. Therefore, 80-67% of patients endured
this aggressive chemotherapy treatment and did not benefit; unnecessarily suffering the
serious physical and emotional side effects, including a risk of permanent heart damage.
Currently, there is no predictive test for selecting which patients will benefit from
receiving chemotherapy and which will not.
In clinical practice, the decision to use chemotherapy or not depends on evaluating the risk
of recurrence and prognosis by interpreting prognostic clinicopathological features including
high cost multi-gene tests such as Oncotype DX (Genomic Health Inc.), Mamma-Print (Agendia),
and PAM50 (NanoString). Unfortunately, almost all these molecular approaches share common
issues, such as insufficiently high levels of evidence, overfitting of computational models,
and high false discovery rates. Furthermore, they might not be available for clinical,
logistical or financial reasons. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a cost effective,
reliable, sensitive, specific, validated biomarker based approach for optimising chemotherapy
treatments in patients with BC.
Recently, the investigators have shown that an accurate prediction can be made by testing the
activity of a protein called 'SPerm associated AntiGen 5' (SPAG5) in tumour tissue. In a
study, published in Lancet Oncology (2016), the investigators showed that SPAG5 gene
amplification, as well as SPAG5 transcript and SPAG5 protein overexpression, were all
associated with poor clinical outcome, and were independent predictors for chemotherapy
response.
The prognostic and predictive power of SPAG5 outperforms many currently used tests including:
the standard cancer proliferation index (Ki67), prognostic clinicopathological factors such
as the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage and Nottingham Prognostic Index, as
well as other currently available multigene-tests including PAM-50, 96-gene genomic grade
index, Genomic Chemo Sensitivity Predictor, the Diagonal Linear Discrimination Analysis of
30-gene signature, and the Adjuvant Online index.
The most immediately useful aspect of our original findings is the potential ability to
distinguish those patients with BC who are likely to benefit from standard Anthracycline
combination (AC) chemotherapy regimens from those who will not. Therefore our findings have
the potential to deliver an accurate predictive biomarker for chemotherapy response in BC
which would enable the effective tailoring of treatment to the individual patient.
Furthermore, the analysis of SPAG5 expression could underpin the development of novel
strategies for more effective management and treatment of the disease.
The work undertaken by the investigators on SPAG5 testing has relied on a commercially
available polyclonal antibody (PAb) against SPAG5 marketed by Sigma Aldrich and produced by
Atlas Antibodies. This has a number of problems when aiming to develop a SPAG5 based clinical
test. Firstly, a PAb is a mixture of antibodies and so it lacks specificity and sensitivity.
Also, as a PAb it is extracted directly from an animal, constraining the supply and placing a
finite limit on the availability of the antibody, as the animal will die one day ending our
ability to provide the test. Thirdly, the PAb is owned by a company and so the cost and
availability of any test will be subject to that company's decision. Therefore it is
essential to develop a monoclonal antibody (MAb) that is suitable for immunohistochemistry
staining of Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) tissue.
To overcome these problems the investigators chose to develop a SPAG5 targeting MAb that can
be taken through the evaluation, clinical testing and regulatory approval process to become a
SPAG5 clinical test. Moreover, once the MAb is developed, the validation of previous results
will be carried out on a large number of BC cases to verify the prognostic and predictive
powers of the antibody. In addition, the predictive utility for chemo-sensitivity of SPAG5
MAb and PAb will be compared to each other and to rival Immunohistochemistry (IHC) tests such
as Ki67 and the rival gene expression tests. A bespoke gene panel will be developed for the
nanoString nCounter™ FLEX instrument, featuring genes used in PAM-50, 21-gene recurrence
Genomic-Chemo-Sensitivity-Predictor, and the 30-gene-DLDA tests, alongside SPAG5 and Ki67.
In June 2018 the investigators were granted funding to pursue this work by the NIHR Invention
for innovation grant program.
;
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT04681911 -
Inetetamab Combined With Pyrotinib and Chemotherapy in the Treatment of HER2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT04890327 -
Web-based Family History Tool
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT04066790 -
Pyrotinib or Trastuzumab Plus Nab-paclitaxel as Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-positive Breast Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT03591848 -
Pilot Study of a Web-based Decision Aid for Young Women With Breast Cancer, During the Proposal for Preservation of Fertility
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03954197 -
Evaluation of Priming Before in Vitro Maturation for Fertility Preservation in Breast Cancer Patients
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT02202746 -
A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of the VEGFR-FGFR-PDGFR Inhibitor, Lucitanib, Given to Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT01472094 -
The Hurria Older PatiEnts (HOPE) With Breast Cancer Study
|
||
| Completed |
NCT06049446 -
Combining CEM and Magnetic Seed Localization of Non-Palpable Breast Tumors
|
||
| Withdrawn |
NCT06057636 -
Hypnosis for Pain in Black Women With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Feasibility Study
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05560334 -
A Single-Arm, Open, Exploratory Clinical Study of Pemigatinib in the Treatment of HER2-negative Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With FGFR Alterations
|
Phase 2 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05501769 -
ARV-471 in Combination With Everolimus for the Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic ER+, HER2- Breast Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04631835 -
Phase I Study of the HS-10352 in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
| Completed |
NCT04307407 -
Exercise in Breast Cancer Survivors
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03544762 -
Correlation of 16α-[18F]Fluoro-17β-estradiol PET Imaging With ESR1 Mutation
|
Phase 3 | |
| Terminated |
NCT02482389 -
Study of Preoperative Boost Radiotherapy
|
N/A | |
| Enrolling by invitation |
NCT00068003 -
Harvesting Cells for Experimental Cancer Treatments
|
||
| Completed |
NCT00226967 -
Stress, Diurnal Cortisol, and Breast Cancer Survival
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT06006390 -
CEA Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Lymphocytes (CAR-T) in the Treatment of CEA Positive Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06037954 -
A Study of Mental Health Care in People With Cancer
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06019325 -
Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block on Chronic Pain Incidence and Acute Pain Scores After Mastectomy
|
N/A |