Multicentre Study to Determine the Feasibility of Using an Integrated Consent Model to Compare Three Standard of Care Regimens for The Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in the Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Setting (REaCT-TNBC) — OTT15-04

Breast Cancer Clinical Trial

Official title:
Multicentre Study to Determine the Feasibility of Using an Integrated Consent Model to Compare Three Standard of Care Regimens for The Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in the Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Setting (REaCT-TNBC) OTT 15-04

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a term applied to breast cancer cases that have <1% expression of the estrogen receptor (ER) and the progesterone receptor (PR) and do not over express HER2.

TNBC is diagnosed in 15-20% of breast cancer cases and tends to occur in younger women and have biologically more aggressive high grade disease. Clinically, patients with TNBC have a poorer prognosis compared to patients diagnosed with other breast cancer subtypes. Because of the aggressive phenotype and due to observations that systemic chemotherapy offers significantly higher benefit in ER negative disease, current treatment guidelines from provincial and other organizations recommend that patients receive adjuvant systemic chemotherapy for any TNBC greater than 0.5 cm in greatest diameter or node positive independent of primary tumor size.

Currently, there is no world-wide standard recommended chemotherapy regimen for the management of TNBC in the neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting, with treatments varying from region and institution.

As physicians do not know what the "best" treatment for patients is, genuine uncertainty ("clinical equipoise") exists. Physicians will choose between different "standards" in their personal practice, using idiosyncratic decision making processes, without the physician or the patient knowing the optimal option. This is not good for patients, physicians and society as a whole. Determining the optimal treatment remains an important medical issue for patients, physicians and society. This study will survey opinions on a novel method to allow comparisons of established standard of care prophylactic treatment using the "integrated consent model" as part of a pragmatic clinical trial and attempt to compare head to head standard chemotherapy regimens in patients with TNBC.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT02688803
Study type	Interventional
Source	Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	Phase 4
Start date	August 2016
Completion date	October 2017

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT04681911` - Inetetamab Combined With Pyrotinib and Chemotherapy in the Treatment of HER2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer	Phase 2
Terminated	`NCT04066790` - Pyrotinib or Trastuzumab Plus Nab-paclitaxel as Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-positive Breast Cancer	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT04890327` - Web-based Family History Tool	N/A
Completed	`NCT03591848` - Pilot Study of a Web-based Decision Aid for Young Women With Breast Cancer, During the Proposal for Preservation of Fertility	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03954197` - Evaluation of Priming Before in Vitro Maturation for Fertility Preservation in Breast Cancer Patients	N/A
Terminated	`NCT02202746` - A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of the VEGFR-FGFR-PDGFR Inhibitor, Lucitanib, Given to Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer	Phase 2
Active, not recruiting	`NCT01472094` - The Hurria Older PatiEnts (HOPE) With Breast Cancer Study
Completed	`NCT06049446` - Combining CEM and Magnetic Seed Localization of Non-Palpable Breast Tumors
Withdrawn	`NCT06057636` - Hypnosis for Pain in Black Women With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Feasibility Study	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05560334` - A Single-Arm, Open, Exploratory Clinical Study of Pemigatinib in the Treatment of HER2-negative Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With FGFR Alterations	Phase 2
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05501769` - ARV-471 in Combination With Everolimus for the Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic ER+, HER2- Breast Cancer	Phase 1
Recruiting	`NCT04631835` - Phase I Study of the HS-10352 in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer	Phase 1
Completed	`NCT04307407` - Exercise in Breast Cancer Survivors	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03544762` - Correlation of 16α-[18F]Fluoro-17β-estradiol PET Imaging With ESR1 Mutation	Phase 3
Terminated	`NCT02482389` - Study of Preoperative Boost Radiotherapy	N/A
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT00068003` - Harvesting Cells for Experimental Cancer Treatments
Completed	`NCT00226967` - Stress, Diurnal Cortisol, and Breast Cancer Survival
Recruiting	`NCT06006390` - CEA Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Lymphocytes (CAR-T) in the Treatment of CEA Positive Advanced Solid Tumors	Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting	`NCT06037954` - A Study of Mental Health Care in People With Cancer	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06019325` - Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block on Chronic Pain Incidence and Acute Pain Scores After Mastectomy	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.