Effectiveness of a Decision Support System in Improving the Diagnosis &

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical decision support has been shown to improve the performance of screening tests; however, few studies have documented direct clinical benefit resulting from the increased screening promoted by clinical decision support systems.

The purpose of this study was to determine if a standards-based, sophisticated decision support system could not only promote additional breast cancer screening, but also detect significantly more breast cancer

Clinical Trial Description

Breast cancer is the most common female cancer. In the United States, the second most common cause of cancer death in women, and the main cause of death in women ages 45 to 55 years old. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening mammography, with or without clinical breast examination, every one to two years among women aged 50 to 69 years old.

Recent research has shown that health care delivered in industrialized nations often falls short of optimal, evidence based care. US adults receive only about half of recommended care. To address these deficiencies in care, health-care organizations are increasingly turning to clinical decision support systems. A clinical decision-support system is any computer program designed to help health-care professionals to make clinical decisions. In a sense, any computer system that deals with clinical data or knowledge is intended to provide decision support.

Examples include manual or computer based systems that attach care reminders to the charts of patients needing specific preventive care services and computerized physician order entry systems that provide patient-specific recommendations as part of the order entry process. Such systems have been shown to improve prescribing practices, reduce serious medication errors, enhance the delivery of preventive care services, and improve adherence to recommended care standards.

The aim of this study is to show the efficacy of a decision-support system as a strategy for improving the performance of the mammography care process and the detection of significantly more breast cancer. ;

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Diagnostic

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT01336257
Study type	Interventional
Source	Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
Contact
Status	Recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	November 2009
Completion date	June 2012

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT04681911` - Inetetamab Combined With Pyrotinib and Chemotherapy in the Treatment of HER2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT04890327` - Web-based Family History Tool	N/A
Terminated	`NCT04066790` - Pyrotinib or Trastuzumab Plus Nab-paclitaxel as Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-positive Breast Cancer	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT03591848` - Pilot Study of a Web-based Decision Aid for Young Women With Breast Cancer, During the Proposal for Preservation of Fertility	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03954197` - Evaluation of Priming Before in Vitro Maturation for Fertility Preservation in Breast Cancer Patients	N/A
Terminated	`NCT02202746` - A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of the VEGFR-FGFR-PDGFR Inhibitor, Lucitanib, Given to Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer	Phase 2
Active, not recruiting	`NCT01472094` - The Hurria Older PatiEnts (HOPE) With Breast Cancer Study
Completed	`NCT06049446` - Combining CEM and Magnetic Seed Localization of Non-Palpable Breast Tumors
Withdrawn	`NCT06057636` - Hypnosis for Pain in Black Women With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Feasibility Study	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05560334` - A Single-Arm, Open, Exploratory Clinical Study of Pemigatinib in the Treatment of HER2-negative Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With FGFR Alterations	Phase 2
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05501769` - ARV-471 in Combination With Everolimus for the Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic ER+, HER2- Breast Cancer	Phase 1
Recruiting	`NCT04631835` - Phase I Study of the HS-10352 in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer	Phase 1
Completed	`NCT04307407` - Exercise in Breast Cancer Survivors	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03544762` - Correlation of 16α-[18F]Fluoro-17β-estradiol PET Imaging With ESR1 Mutation	Phase 3
Terminated	`NCT02482389` - Study of Preoperative Boost Radiotherapy	N/A
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT00068003` - Harvesting Cells for Experimental Cancer Treatments
Completed	`NCT00226967` - Stress, Diurnal Cortisol, and Breast Cancer Survival
Recruiting	`NCT06006390` - CEA Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Lymphocytes (CAR-T) in the Treatment of CEA Positive Advanced Solid Tumors	Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting	`NCT06019325` - Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block on Chronic Pain Incidence and Acute Pain Scores After Mastectomy	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06037954` - A Study of Mental Health Care in People With Cancer	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Effectiveness of a Decision Support System in Improving the Diagnosis and Screening Rate of Breast Cancer

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms