Breast Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Prospective Study to Evaluate Alterations in Molecular Biomarkers in HER2 Neu Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Together With Assessment of Trastuzumab Use Beyond Progression After Initial Response to Trastuzumab-taxane Based Treatment
| Verified date | February 2018 |
| Source | Hoffmann-La Roche |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
This single arm study will evaluate alterations in molecular marker expression in HER2-positive targeted therapy, and will evaluate the effect of continued treatment with Herceptin and Xeloda beyond progression following initial Herceptin-taxane chemotherapy. Patients who develop progressive disease will receive first-line Herceptin (8mg/kg iv loading dose and 6mg/kg iv every 3 weeks) + taxane therapy. patients who develop progressive disease within 9 weeks of treatment will continue treatment with Herceptin in combination with Xeloda (1000mg/m2 po bid on days 1-14 of each 3-week cycle).Biopsies of tumor tissue will be taken for biomarker and gene profiling evaluation. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, intolerable side effects or patient choice, and the target sample size is 100 individuals.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 33 |
| Est. completion date | February 18, 2013 |
| Est. primary completion date | February 18, 2013 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | Female |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - female patients, >=18 years of age; - HER2-positive breast cancer; - al least one metastatic site amenable for core biopsy; - left ventricular ejection fraction >50%. Exclusion Criteria: - prior adjuvant/neoadjuvant Herceptin within past 6 months; - prior adjuvant taxane therapy within past 12 months; - use of chemotherapy, immunotherapy or biological anticancer therapy within past 3 weeks; - known bleeding diatheses. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; Medical Oncology | Camperdown | New South Wales |
| Australia | Eastern Health Breast Cancer Research | East Ringwood | Victoria |
| Australia | Mount Medical Center | Perth | Western Australia |
| Australia | Royal Perth Hospital; Department of Medical Oncology | Perth | Western Australia |
| Australia | Royal North Shore Hospital; Oncology | St. Leonards | New South Wales |
| Australia | Border Medical Oncology; Murray Valley Private Hospital | Wodonga | Victoria |
| Spain | Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla; Servicio de Oncologia | Santander | Cantabria |
| Spain | Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia; Servicio de Onco-hematologia | Valencia | |
| Sweden | Karolinska Hospital; Oncology - Radiumhemmet | Stockholm | |
| Sweden | Akademiska sjukhuset, Onkologkliniken | Uppsala | |
| United Kingdom | Hull Royal Infirmary | Hull | |
| United Kingdom | Christie Hospital; Breast Cancer Research Office | Manchester | |
| United Kingdom | Nottingham City Hospital; Oncology | Nottingham |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Hoffmann-La Roche |
Australia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Part I: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Biomarker | Progression was defined as an increase by at least 20 percent (%) from the smallest value in the Sum of Longest Diameter (SLD) of lesions. Biomarkers investigated: p95 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (p95HER2) positive (+ve) and negative (-ve) , insulin growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) less than (<) median and greater than or equal to (=) median membrane H score, c-MET | End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 Cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months |
| |
| Primary | Part II: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Biomarker | PFS was calculated from first study medication in Part II to date of progression or death.The relationship between PFS and the following biomarker variables was investigated in each of study Part 1 and 2: p95HER2 +ve and -ve population, IGF1R | End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months |
| |
| Primary | Part I: Time to Progression (TTP) by Biomarker | Progression was defined as an increase by at least 20% from the smallest value in the SLD of lesions.TTP was determined as the time in months from the date of screening until first progression.The relationship between PFS and the following biomarker variables was investigated in each of study Part 1 and 2: p95 HER2 +ve and -ve population, IGF1R | End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 Cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 weeks |
| |
| Primary | Part II: TTP by Biomarker | TTP was calculated from first study medication in Part II to date of progression. The relationship between TTP and the following biomarker variables was investigated in each of study Part 1 and 2: p95 HER2 +ve and -ve population, IGF1R | End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months |
| |
| Primary | Part I: Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD) or Progrerssive Disease (PD) by Biomarker | BOR was defined according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR: disappearance of all target lesions and all pathological lymph nodes below 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or persistence of non-target lesions. The relationship between best response and the following biomarkers was investigated: p95 HER2 (+ve/-ve), IGF1R, c-MET, PTEN, HER2 (median/=median), PI3K catalytic subunit (WT/M), and FC gamma receptors IIIa, IIa and IIb (phenotypes FF, VF, VV, HH, HR, RR and II, IT and TT respectively). The correlation between the biomarker variables and percentage of participants with best response were investigated using a univariate regression analysis. | End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 weeks | |
| Primary | Part II: Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of CR, PR, SD or PD by Biomarker | Best Overall response was defined according to RECIST. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and all pathological lymph nodes below 10 mm.PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or persistence of non-target lesions. The relationship between best response and the following biomarkers was investigated: p95 HER2 (+ve/-ve), IGF1R, c-MET, PTEN, HER2 (| End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months |
| |
| Secondary | Part I: TTP in Intent to Treat (ITT) Population | TTP was determined as the time in months from the date of screening until first progression. In participants with measurable disease, progression was defined according to RECIST (SLD increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study [including baseline, if that is the smallest]). In participants with non-measurable disease, progression was defined as the presence of new lesions or unequivocal progression during treatment. | End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months | |
| Secondary | Part I: PFS in ITT Population | PFS was determined as the time in months from the date of screening until first progression. In participants with measurable disease, progression was defined according to RECIST (SLD increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study [including baseline, if that is the smallest]).. In participants with non-measurable disease, progression was defined as the presence of new lesions or unequivocal progression during treatment. | End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months | |
| Secondary | Part II: TTP in Intent to Treat (ITT) Population | TTP was calculated from first study medication in Part II to date of progression. In participants with measurable disease progression was defined according to RECIST(SLD increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study [including baseline, if that is the smallest]). In participants with non-measurable disease, progression was defined as the presence of new lesions or unequivocal progression during treatment. | End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 Cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months | |
| Secondary | Part II: PFS in ITT Population | PFS was calculated from first study medication in Part II to date of progression or death. In participants with measurable disease progression was defined according to RECIST (SLD increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study [including baseline, if that is the smallest]). In participants with non-measurable disease, progression was defined as the presence of new lesions or unequivocal progression during treatment. | End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months | |
| Secondary | Overall Survival in Per Protocol Population | Overall survival was calculated in months from the day of screening until death. | End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until death (up to 46 months) | |
| Secondary | Overall Survival in ITT Population | Overall survival was calculated in months from the day of screening until death. | End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until death (up to 46 months) | |
| Secondary | Part I and II: Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of CR or PR in ITT Population | Best Overall response was defined according to RECIST. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and all pathological lymph nodes below 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or persistence of non-target lesions. | End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 Cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months | |
| Secondary | Part I and II: Percentage of Participants With a Response by Best Overall Response by CR, PR, SD or PD in ITT Population | Best Overall response was defined according to RECIST. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and all pathological lymph nodes below 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or persistence of non-target lesions. | End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT04681911 -
Inetetamab Combined With Pyrotinib and Chemotherapy in the Treatment of HER2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT04890327 -
Web-based Family History Tool
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT04066790 -
Pyrotinib or Trastuzumab Plus Nab-paclitaxel as Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-positive Breast Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT03591848 -
Pilot Study of a Web-based Decision Aid for Young Women With Breast Cancer, During the Proposal for Preservation of Fertility
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03954197 -
Evaluation of Priming Before in Vitro Maturation for Fertility Preservation in Breast Cancer Patients
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT02202746 -
A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of the VEGFR-FGFR-PDGFR Inhibitor, Lucitanib, Given to Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT01472094 -
The Hurria Older PatiEnts (HOPE) With Breast Cancer Study
|
||
| Completed |
NCT06049446 -
Combining CEM and Magnetic Seed Localization of Non-Palpable Breast Tumors
|
||
| Withdrawn |
NCT06057636 -
Hypnosis for Pain in Black Women With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Feasibility Study
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05560334 -
A Single-Arm, Open, Exploratory Clinical Study of Pemigatinib in the Treatment of HER2-negative Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With FGFR Alterations
|
Phase 2 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05501769 -
ARV-471 in Combination With Everolimus for the Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic ER+, HER2- Breast Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04631835 -
Phase I Study of the HS-10352 in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
| Completed |
NCT04307407 -
Exercise in Breast Cancer Survivors
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03544762 -
Correlation of 16α-[18F]Fluoro-17β-estradiol PET Imaging With ESR1 Mutation
|
Phase 3 | |
| Terminated |
NCT02482389 -
Study of Preoperative Boost Radiotherapy
|
N/A | |
| Enrolling by invitation |
NCT00068003 -
Harvesting Cells for Experimental Cancer Treatments
|
||
| Completed |
NCT00226967 -
Stress, Diurnal Cortisol, and Breast Cancer Survival
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT06006390 -
CEA Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Lymphocytes (CAR-T) in the Treatment of CEA Positive Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06037954 -
A Study of Mental Health Care in People With Cancer
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06019325 -
Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block on Chronic Pain Incidence and Acute Pain Scores After Mastectomy
|
N/A |