View clinical trials related to Brain Injuries.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to investigate whether a tDCS-accompanied intensive naming therapy leads to a performance improvement in patients with chronic aphasia induced by a moderate TBI
- Brief Summary: Prospective, cohort, open-label study. The cohort consists of people who have a chronic balance dysfunction due to a mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI). All participants will participate in a 14-week PoNS Treatment protocol - a combination of symptom specific physical exercises and repeated use of the PoNS device. Subjects who meet the initial screening entrance criteria will be scheduled for a baseline assessment to evaluate balance and gait. Subjects will then begin the PoNS Treatment program and re-perform some assessments at 2, 5 and 14 weeks evaluating their functional improvements.
- Brief Summary: Prospective, cohort, open-label study. The cohort consists of people who have a chronic balance dysfunction due to a mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI). All participants will participate in a 14-week PoNS Treatment protocol - a combination of symptom specific physical exercises and repeated use of the PoNS device. Subjects who meet the initial screening entrance criteria will be scheduled for a baseline assessment to evaluate balance and gait. Subjects will then begin the PoNS Treatment program and re-perform some assessments at 2, 5 and 14 weeks evaluating their functional improvements.
The proposed clinical investigation plan is a randomized controlled pivotal study with 2 parallel groups, has a total duration of two years. For the study, 30 pediatric patients suffering from acquired brain injury will be recruited at the Scientific institute Eugenio Medea. The primary aim of this study is to assess the clinical benefit of using an ankle mobilization device for the rehabilitation of pediatric patients with acquired brain injuries, on its clinical performance and its risks, and on its safety. The efficacy of the treatment will be evaluated in terms of ankle range of motion (primary outcome). The effects of the treatment on musculoskeletal plasticity will be studied using an isokinetic machine and functional magnetic resonance imaging will provide information on variations of reactivity in the motor cortical network. Ease of use, safety and usability of the device will also be evaluated.
This is a prospective clinical study designed to evaluate biomarkers of brain injury and dementia incidence and moderate cognitive decline rates in moderate- to high-risk atrial fibrillation patients that undergo standard of care atrial fibrillation management.
Low mood and depression are common following acquired brain injury (ABI). There is a lack evidence on effective treatments in ABI. Behavioural Activation (BA) is a potentially valuable option. People with low mood can have problems imagining, planning and engaging in positive activities, or avoid activities due to fear of negative consequences. This can reduce positive reinforcement, further lowering mood. BA aims to reverse this cycle by encouraging individuals to engage in enjoyable activities. Despite its simplicity, it has been as effective as "talking therapies" and mood medication in non-ABI populations. Its simplicity may be particularly helpful in ABI where cognitive problems can form additional barriers to activity engagement. This study will examine two ways to increase activity levels and improve mood. The first (Activity Engagement Group) is a social group run once a week for 8 weeks in which ABI participants will be encouraged to engage in games, crafts and discussion. The aim is that members gain direct positive reinforcement and may challenge fears such that activity levels could be maintained and mood enhanced after the group ends. The second approach (Activity Planning Group), again an 8-week group, is to help participants identify, plan and schedule positive activities. The group will include discussion on identifying and overcoming problems in planning activities. Again, the hope is that training skills in planning and scheduling will generalise beyond the group. The primary purpose is to examine the practicality, feasibility, and acceptability of the two approaches in ABI. A secondary purpose is to evaluate whether either group leads to improvements in activity levels and mood compared to a waitlist group. Individuals will be randomised to the Activity Engagement, Activity Planning Group or the 8-week Waitlist group. All will complete measures of activity levels and mood. At the end of the groups, these measures will be repeated. Waitlist participants will then be re-randomised to either the Activity Engagement Group or the Activity Planning Group. Recruitment rates, drop out rates, and exit interviews will be used to assess feasibility and how meaningful or valuable participants found the groups. Comparison of measures will provide some indication of whether the groups are associated with improvements compared to those waitlisted. To establish whether any benefits last, all participants will repeat the measures 1 month after the groups end.
Main objective : To compare the quality of the prognostic assessment, (adverse evolution at 6 months) of severe and moderate traumatic brain injury, performed by the clinician compared to the prognosis described by the IMPACT score. The Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital is conducting a study evaluating the clinician's prognostic assessment of severe and moderate traumatic brain injury compared to the prognosis described by the IMPACT score. The investigators compare the quality of the clinician's prognostic assessment (adverse evolution at 6 months) of severe and moderate traumatic brain injury to the prognosis described by the IMPACT score.
The study aims to demonstrate improvement of daily life functioning and improvement of cognitive tests in post traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients suffering from working memory deficit, by a 3-month specific cognitive rehabilitation program, in comparison with patients with usual non-specific rehabilitation of same duration. As secondary objectives, the study aims to: - demonstrate improvement of specific neuropsychological tests of working memory; - demonstrate improvement of non-specific tasks involving working memory; - assess the evolution in not-targeted domains by the specific rehabilitation, which would give evidence of a global cognitive stimulation effect; - demonstrate improvement of social integration ability and quality of life; - demonstrate persistence of effects at 3 months and 6 months after the end of treatment; - demonstrate the acceptability, the tolerance and the feasibility of rehabilitation.
The general objective of the comaScore project is to provide an external validation of the accuracy of the comaScore, a score derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to predict 1 year outcome of patients unresponsive to simple orders after traumatic brain injury (TBI), aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhages (aSAH) and cardiac arrest (CA) in the day 7 - day 45 period post brain injury.
In this proposal, the investigators extend their previous SPiRE feasibility and preliminary effectiveness study to examine STEP-Home efficacy in a RCT design. This novel therapy will target the specific needs of a broad range of underserved post-9/11 Veterans. It is designed to foster reintegration by facilitating meaningful improvement in the functional skills most central to community participation: emotional regulation (ER), problem solving (PS), and attention functioning (AT). The skills trained in the STEP-Home workshop are novel in their collective use and have not been systematically applied to a Veteran population prior to the investigators' SPiRE study. STEP-Home will equip Veterans with skills to improve daily function, reduce anger and irritability, and assist reintegration to civilian life through return to work, family, and community, while simultaneously providing psychoeducation to promote future engagement in VA care. The innovative nature of the STEP-Home intervention is founded in the fact that it is: (a) an adaptation of an established and efficacious intervention, now applied to post-9/11 Veterans; (b) nonstigmatizing (not "therapy" but a "skills workshop" to boost acceptance, adherence and retention); (c) transdiagnostic (open to all post-9/11 Veterans with self-reported reintegration difficulties; Veterans often have multiple mental health diagnoses, but it is not required for enrollment); (d) integrative (focus on the whole person rather than specific and often stigmatizing mental and physical health conditions); (e) comprised of Veteran-specific content to teach participants cognitive behavioral skills needed for successful reintegration (which led to greater acceptability in feasibility study); (f) targets anger and irritability, particularly during interactions with civilians; (g) emphasizes psychoeducation (including other available treatment options for common mental health conditions); and (h) challenges beliefs/barriers to mental health care to increase openness to future treatment and greater mental health treatment utilization. Many Veterans who participated in the development phases of this workshop have gone on to trauma or other focused therapies, or taken on vocational (work/school/volunteer) roles after STEP-Home. The investigators have demonstrated that the STEP-Home workshop is feasible and results in pre-post change in core skill acquisition that the investigators demonstrated to be directly associated with post-workshop improvement in reintegration status in their SPiRE study. Given the many comorbidities of this cohort, the innovative treatment addresses multiple aspects of mental health, cognitive, and emotional function simultaneously and bolsters reintegration in a short-term group to maximize cost-effectiveness while maintaining quality of care.