View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:A 6-month prospective, digital randomized controlled trial targeting approximately 49,000 individuals to evaluate the effectiveness of an influenza vaccination intervention during influenza season for people with cardiovascular conditions
The primary purpose of this trial is to evaluate the impact of empagliflozin, as compared with placebo, in patients with diabetes mellitus or overweight, heart failure and atrial fibrillation.
This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, investigator- and participant-blinded study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of HSY244 in participants with atrial fibrillation (AF), with and without heart failure (HF).
RR2 is a medical, home-care, digital therapeutic, wearable device. Its main purpose is to deliver prescheduled, non-invasive, peripheral neuromodulation therapy, in conjunction with standard medical care, to relieve AF symptoms, recurrence and overall burden.
The NEwTON AF study is a multi-center, global, prospective, single arm study to establish the safety and effectiveness of the IntellaNav StablePoint Catheter and Force-Sensing System in subjects with symptomatic, drug refractory, recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Atrial fibrillation treatments have a limited efficacy and often cause long-term side effects. This study aims to develop and validate an ECGI system to risk stratification in patients with persistent AF, identifying the mechanisms responsible for the maintenance and the best treatment for ending it.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common debilitating heart rhythm condition that can cause heart failure and negatively impact a patient's outlook in terms of symptoms and disability. It is an irregular fast heart rhythm disorder coming from the top chamber of the heart (left atrium). Catheter ablation treatment has been shown to be effective in controlling or eliminating AF and its associated symptoms. This is now a common and effective treatment option for patients suffering with AF. During ablation, thermal energy is applied in the top chamber of the heart (the left atrium) to abolish abnormal electrical signals that cause AF. It is generally a safe procedure, but one potential risk associated with this procedure is damage to the oesophagus caused by thermal energy being transmitted to the oesophagus from the heart. The oesophagus sits just behind the heart chamber where ablation work is performed, about 5mm away, so it is vulnerable to damage. Although the risk of severe oesophageal damage is low, if it occurs it can be serious as the patient may become very ill as a result. In a recent study, it was shown that a more advanced type of oesophageal probe that cools the oesophagus during ablation is better at protecting the oesophagus from ablation-related injury compared to the standard care probe currently used. As it was a single-centre study, more evidence is required before knowing if this type of probe is more effective in protecting the oesophagus. The purpose is to run a multi-centre randomized study to compare the safety of AF ablation when there is protection by the oesophageal cooling probe versus the standard of care oesophageal temperature monitoring probe. This means that there is a 50:50 chance of the new cooling probe being used during AF ablation for participants.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. Current European guidelines recommend catheter ablation of AF in symptomatic patients refractory to antiarrhythmic therapy. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains the cornerstone of any ablation procedure irrespective of patient characteristics. Recently, stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) with precise high-dose of radiation was used to treat ventricular arrhythmias in patients with a high risk of complications during transcatheter ablation.
This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of one or more doses of AP30663 for cardioversion in adult participants with AF.
The Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) based on real clinical data and its own algorithms can help to make the right choice. This trial is designed to assess the difference between retrospective electronic medical cards (EMC) therapy prescriptions and MedicBK prescriptions based on key patient characteristics.