View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:Prospective, blinded, multicenter international trial to test the Preventicus Heartbeats App in a prospective cohort.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a demonstrably effective device intervention for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and specific indication. However, many patients with heart failure (HF) are unable to maintain sinus rhythm and approximately 30-36% of CRT patients are in atrial fibrillation (AF).
The QDOT-Micro study is a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, interventional clinical study.
In order to understand the risks and benefits of edoxaban use in a real-world clinical setting in the Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) indication, Daiichi-Sankyo proposed this post-authorization safety study (PASS) to gain insight into the safety (bleeding, liver adverse events, all-cause mortality and other drug related adverse events) of edoxaban use in patients with NVAF who were not preselected.
When the upper chambers of a person's heart receive or generate irregular electrical signals, it causes abnormal rhythm in the heartbeat. This is called atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation goes along with blood clots that may cause mainly strokes and less often other diseases, such as a heart attack. Some patients with atrial fibrillation have other heart disease, such as heart valves that may need to be replaced using catheters. Often doctors give patients drugs that reduce those blood clots. These are either vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or direct anticoagulants, such as edoxaban. In these patients, it is unclear which of the drugs is better for reducing stroke without increasing severe bleedings.
There are insufficient data on the safety and efficacy of edoxaban therapy in subjects with AF following catheter ablation. This phase 3b study is designed to evaluate the safety and to explore the efficacy of an edoxaban-based antithrombotic regimen versus a VKA-based antithrombotic regimen in subjects with AF following catheter ablation. Bleeding is a central safety outcome in cardiovascular clinical trials, especially for antithrombotic strategies and invasive procedures.
This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point evaluation trial. The patient population consists of patients on hemodialysis who have atrial fibrillation (AF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) .
The purpose of the study is to investigate the impact of motivational interviewing in the adherence of patients with AF to oral anticoagulation (OAC) regimens. Patients assigned to the intervention group will be interviewed and guided on the importance of adherence to OAC medication, and will be contacted at 1 week, 2 months, 6 months and 1 year after discharge for educational interactive sessions. Patients in the control group will receive usual treatment and will be contacted at 1 year after discharge.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, accounting for one third of all hospital admissions and 1% of all emergency department visits (ED). Approximately 65% of those presenting to the ED with AF are admitted. There are also numerous reasons for patients to get AF with rapid ventricular rate (AF RVR) during hospitalization. In the acute setting these patients are often treated with diltiazem, a non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (ND CCB), or metoprolol, a beta blocker (BB). Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (diltiazem and verapamil) use is considered harmful and national guidelines recommend against use in patients with decompensated heart failure (HF). This recommendation is based on studies with long-term treatment. The purpose of this study is to assess the difference between metoprolol and diltiazem for the acute treatment of AF RVR in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
Background: Different studies with real-life data and randomized controlled trials have shown a detection rate of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) of 10-20% in patients with cryptogenic stroke using insertable continuous cardiac monitoring for 6 months. More studies are needed, however, to identify factors which can be used to select the patients where the possibility of detecting AF with prolonged rhythm monitoring is highest, to evaluate the best duration of rhythm monitoring, to determine the optimal deļ¬nition of short-term AF that warrants intervention and to evaluate whether intervention results in improved clinical outcomes. Methods: The NOR-FIB study is a multi-centre prospective observational trial, designed to evaluate detection of AF in cryptogenic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Patients admitted with cryptogenic stroke or TIA in stroke units in the Nordic countries, aged 18-80 years are included and have the Reveal LINQ® Insertable cardiac monitor system implanted for 12 months for the purpose of AF detection. Biomarkers that may identify patients, who could derive the most clinical benefit from the detection of AF by prolonged monitoring, are being studied. Conclusion: This NOR-FIB study will increase our knowledge regarding the occurrence of AF in patients with cryptogenic stroke and TIA that potentially can improve secondary prevention. The study will provide information on biomarkers that may be used to select cryptogenic TIA and stroke patients for long-term monitoring as well as information on the significance of short-term AF and optimal duration of cardiac rhythm monitoring.