View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of high density voltage and fractionation map guided ablation compared to anatomy-based circumferential pulmonary vein Isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation
The prognostic implication of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedure in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients from China is still unclear. We aim to investigate the impact of LAAO procedure on subsequent clinical outcomes in patients from China.
Health inequality and genetic disparity are a significant issue in the United Kingdom (UK). This study focuses on diseases that are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in the UK, and specifically examines the extent and basis of treatment failure in different patient populations. The vast majority of drug registration clinical trials have under-representation of ethnic minority populations. In addition, the wider Caucasian populations have reasonably different clinical characteristics to the population that participated in the drug licencing clinical trials. A consequence of this is that drugs are licensed for use in real-world general patient populations where the clinical trial results are simply not statistically significant to specifically demonstrate efficacy or safety in populations that were either absent or under-represented in the drug registration clinical trials. When these facts are considered alongside data that supports significant under-reporting of adverse events in the real-world setting within the UK (and globally, e.g the USA and Europe), it highlights that pharmacovigilance systems are unable to capture drug effectiveness and safety data in a manner that can reasonably assure appropriate prescribing in the wider patient populations. This large real-world research study aims to identify whether commonly prescribed drugs are effective in treating illnesses that cause significant poor health and death in the different patient populations that represent the UK. The goal of this study is to generate large quantitative data-sets that may inform clinical practice to reduce the existing health inequality and genetic disparity in the UK.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of abbreviated 3-day anticoagulation with dabigatran etexilate before cardioversion guided by trans-oesophageal echocardiography in comparison with conventional 3- week course of dabigatran etexilate before cardioversion
Multinational, investigator-initiated study of oral anticoagulation versus no anticoagulation for the prevention of stroke and other adverse cardiovascular events in patients with transient perioperative atrial fibrillation after noncardiac surgery and additional stroke risk factors.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common atrial arrhythmia. Ablation of AF is a recent technique, nevertheless, the success rates of ablation vary between 50% and 70% depending on the paroxysmal or persistent nature of AF. These rates are difficult to assess in routine practice because they are based on the recurrence of fibrillation. The Vitaphone is a non-invasive device, with which the patient can record a single-track ECG as his or her symptoms take place. The plot is then transmitted via the internet to the centre, which can thus diagnose a relapse of AF. The aim of our study is to correlate the rhythm and symptoms of 20 patients with Vitaphone 6 months after AF ablation and to compare them with 20 other patients receiving conventional monitoring.
To estimate the prevalence of iron deficiency (ID) in patients with atrial fibrillation
to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CKD-825 in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
To assess whether edoxaban (60/30 mg daily) compared to non-antithrombotic medical therapy (either no antithrombotic therapy or antiplatelet monotherapy) reduces the risk of stroke (composite of ischemic, hemorrhagic and unspecified stroke) in high-risk atrial fibrillation (CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2) patients with previous intracranial hemorrhage.
This prospective multi-center randomized controlled study aims to compare atrial fibrillation detection and inappropriate therapy according to activation of atrial sensing capability in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator.